Who is worth more, Maddison or Wilson.
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sp...majority-coventry-city-supporters-say-9241106
Really?
Simon, can you sort the readership out a bit?
It's a poor summary of peoples responses and a shit article with an inaccurate conclusion.
People weren't asked who is worth more Wilson or Maddison, they were asked what is Maddison worth. Since over half the people say over 3m and Sisu sold Wilson for 3m that means over half the people think Maddison is worth more than Wilson, except of course it doesn't mean that at all. It means over half the people surveyed think maddison is worth more than Wilson was sold for last year, if you asked the same people what they think Wilson is worth you'd probably get responces of well over 10 or even 20m.
Stats, science and journalism done by someone incapable of any of them.
It's a poor summary of peoples responses and a shit article with an inaccurate conclusion.
People weren't asked who is worth more Wilson or Maddison, they were asked what is Maddison worth. Since over half the people say over 3m and Sisu sold Wilson for 3m that means over half the people think Maddison is worth more than Wilson, except of course it doesn't mean that at all. It means over half the people surveyed think maddison is worth more than Wilson was sold for last year, if you asked the same people what they think Wilson is worth you'd probably get responces of well over 10 or even 20m.
Stats, science and journalism done by someone incapable of any of them.
Its typical CET making up a crap headline which doesn't represent the content of the article.If someone wanted to take Wilson from Bournemouth you'd be looking at something between 7.5 and 12 million imo. Maddison, perhaps 2/3 million.
If it is based on what we sold Wilson for against what we might sell Maddison fors, then it might have some legs.
Personally I think Maddison is being over hyped.
he hasn't really proved anything yet and next year will be a marked man even off the bench
If it is based on what we sold Wilson for against what we might sell Maddison fors, then it might have some legs.
Personally I think Maddison is being over hyped.
he hasn't really proved anything yet and next year will be a marked man even off the bench
It's a poor summary of peoples responses and a shit article with an inaccurate conclusion.
People weren't asked who is worth more Wilson or Maddison, they were asked what is Maddison worth. Since over half the people say over 3m and Sisu sold Wilson for 3m that means over half the people think Maddison is worth more than Wilson, except of course it doesn't mean that at all. It means over half the people surveyed think maddison is worth more than Wilson was sold for last year, if you asked the same people what they think Wilson is worth you'd probably get responces of well over 10 or even 20m.
Stats, science and journalism done by someone incapable of any of them.
Actually I should correct myself, the article is fine it's the headline that utterly ruins it, if they are written by different people it's only the headline writer and presumably the editor (or whoever signs off on a piece) that deserve criticism.
I'm fucking sick of the Telegraph and their bullshit headlines. And their stupid fucking polls.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?