If he wanted the job then surely he would have applied, which apparently he didn't so why mess around playing hard to get? It isn't some sort of teenage drama show.
Oh and the paper isn't made in Coventry.
I'm sat in Coventry writing articles for the paper right now...
I'm sat in Coventry writing articles for the paper right now...
'Man loses hat in radford' or another similar exclusive
Sources close to the hat believe it was a fedora. But it is believed it is a baseball cap.
Click below to vote on your favourite type of hat. Results will be published tomorrow.
Reaction the day after that, then readers comments the day after that to almost milk the full week.
I'm sat in Coventry writing articles for the paper right now...
Our sources now indicate that it isn't a hat as we believed but actually a bandana stay tuned....more to followSources close to the hat believe it was a fedora. But it is believed it is a baseball cap.
Click below to vote on your favourite type of hat. Results will be published tomorrow.
Reaction the day after that, then readers comments the day after that to almost milk the full week.
Then you read the article and he's said nothing of the sort. Only sources close to him have said he would have to consider it due to the history and stature of the football club.
Clickbait gutter press.
Hasn't even applied for it. Jokers.
Yep, just stick the word "understands" in your article and it doesn't matter if it's true or not.
They always make the headline not match, getting a bit desperate to get clicks I think.
Still standing by my original point Simon.
Sources close to the hat believe it was a fedora. But it is believed it is a baseball cap.
Click below to vote on your favourite type of hat. Results will be published tomorrow.
Reaction the day after that, then readers comments the day after that to almost milk the full week.
You obviously don't understand my original problem with it. It was headlined as a definite thing when at the time it wasn't. Simple as that. I think they should have saved that headline for when they had an actual quote.
What specifically about the headline "Tony Mowbray up for City challenge" was incorrect at the time?
There wasn't any official definite quotes. It was 'we believe' 'we understand' etc. Pop that in the headline and you're good to go.
Some of the best articles don't have direct quotes in.
Sometimes we have to sacrifice being able to attribute the story in order to get the news out there. That's how we maintain good, reliable sources.
There wasn't any official definite quotes. It was 'we believe' 'we understand' etc. Pop that in the headline and you're good to go.
So you were totally fine with the story, but the lack of a verbatim, on the record quote in the headline means they're "clickbait gutter press" not worthy of advertisers' money? O......k then.
It was Clickbait. Pop 'we understand' in the headline and it's less likely I'm clicking and reading the article. And they know that.
It was clickbait.
It wasn't clickbait, it was accurate and timely reporting. It's clear you have an axe to grind with the Telegraph, and you've had your fun with it in this thread, but maybe admitting you were wrong this time and having a laugh about it might be better at this point, rather than insisting they're still the "gutter press" for trying to get people to actually read their stories.
Actually agree with Hill on this, not convinced the CT should be bragging about being first to break the news. He was interested, under no circumstances does that mean the job was his. The fact there were two candidates at the weekend highlights this.
Funny they weren't shouting from the roof tops when Pressley didn't get the Huddersfield job...
Actually agree with Hill on this, not convinced the CT should be bragging about being first to break the news. He was interested, under no circumstances does that mean the job was his. The fact there were two candidates at the weekend highlights this.
Funny they weren't shouting from the roof tops when Pressley didn't get the Huddersfield job...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?