True, but we could do with at least trying to sell some season tickets.
But who to?
The probability they've at minimum halved future uptake ,potentially offers them half the time required to pass them on ,maybe at these upcoming forums??
There is obviously no shortage of money ,players salaries are continuing to be funded ,Mr Appleton has had no assets to sell to cover a company without any apparent costs .:thinking about:
Yes you are right. We are not in administration. It's getting very worrying I think.
Yes you are right. We are not in administration. It's getting very worrying I think.
Is this where we are;
ACL and League thinks the Club is in administration.
SISU and Appleton think otherwise??
Is the actual Football Club in Administration - evidence is that it is not - Holdings are still paying the wages etc and carrying on near normal business, although can't release season tickets for next season as we have no agreement to play anywhere.
When will ACL understand that they should be meeting the Club and vice versa.
It appears that SISU will not be bullied out, in fairness to them they have put large amounts of money into the Club. (And still the most hated Club Owners ).
Holdings have no external debts - not even a mortgage on Ryton, so almost impossible to be forced into administration.
Hopefully Appleton can mediate between the two parties for the benefit of the Supporters.
Company in administration has no assets in terms of money - so where is Appleton going to obtain his fees from?? Maybe why he's not active and always on holiday etc.
why do ACL have to rely on a Lawyer - are they that incompetent. (probably after the balloon episode). Must also be flush with money to pay his fees.
I suspect already the money spent on legal fees has already exceeded the actual rent debt.
Company in administration has no assets in terms of money - so where is Appleton going to obtain his fees from?? Maybe why he's not active and always on holiday etc.
why do ACL have to rely on a Lawyer - are they that incompetent. (probably after the balloon episode). Must also be flush with money to pay his fees.
I suspect already the money spent on legal fees has already exceeded the actual rent debt.
It's unfortunate, but SISU cannot be trusted. There is an impasse (created over several years). The posts on this board are often conjecture but by now most of us would agree that if two adversaries can't work together then lawyers will get involved. Remembering also that SISU play dirty and withheld rent (They took it on when they purchased the business),therefore pay it or get out.
What exactly is playing dirty about not paying rent? It's a valid move and ACL were in their rights to refuse entry the second we owed them money.
Why didn't they?
What exactly is playing dirty about not paying rent? It's a valid move and ACL were in their rights to refuse entry the second we owed them money.
Why didn't they?
how can you say withholding rent is not playing dirty of course it is
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?