Team for Brum? (1 Viewer)

Paxman II · Jan 28, 2021

.................................WILSON....................................
..........McFAZDEAN......OOSTIGARRD.......HYAM.....
PASK......................................................Mc.CALLUM
..................HAMER............JAMES..............................
.....................ALLEN......O'HARE................................
............................GYOKERES.....................................

Thoughts?

TomRad85 · Jan 28, 2021

Paxman II said:
.................................WILSON....................................
..........McFAZDEAN......OOSTIGARRD.......HYAM.....
PASK......................................................Mc.CALLUM
..................HAMER............JAMES..............................
.....................ALLEN......O'HARE................................
............................GYOKERES.....................................

Thoughts?

Stick with 4 at the back in my opinion.

Sent from my SM-G973F using Tapatalk

AFCCOVENTRY · Jan 28, 2021

Just Pask for Dabo and 4-4-2. Wouldn’t change a winning team.

no_loyalty · Jan 28, 2021

Same team that started last night, with the exception of Pask in for Dabo. I know McFadzdean is having a good season, but I wouldn’t change a winning team.

Paxman II · Jan 28, 2021

no_loyalty said:
Same team that started last night, with the exception of Pask in for Dabo. I know McFadzdean is having a good season, but I wouldn’t change a winning team.

The winning team ended with a substitute scoring and making a real impact?

mark82 · Jan 28, 2021

I'd stick with the same system as last night. Felt more solid at the back to me with more threat going forward, albeit against a poor team.

no_loyalty · Jan 28, 2021

Paxman II said:
The winning team ended with a substitute scoring and making a real impact?

I would keep Allen as an impact sub, he will chase everything when the opposition players are tiring.

stupot07 · Jan 28, 2021

Paxman II said:
The winning team ended with a substitute scoring and making a real impact?

You do have to put into context, 1 nil up, Sheffield having to come out and be more open leaving gaps, tired legs.

Not saying he didn't do well, but it is about context. Same with Baka's cameo.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk

rob9872 · Jan 28, 2021

Pask did well, but is Dacosta injured? I'd rather see him in there, particularly if he does revert to a back 3 again. If 442 then either is fine.

Harry_Walker · Jan 28, 2021

Gotta stick as close as possible to yesterday’s team. Either Pask for Dabo or Fadz for Dabo with Ostigard in at full back. Other than that no changes should be contemplated

PVA · Jan 28, 2021

I think I'd stick with 4 at the back.

Our biggest attacking threat is usually our wing backs but if Dabo is injured, as seems likely, then I don't think we want Pask being one of our main attacking outlets. He's much better as a right back than wing back.

steve cooper · Jan 28, 2021

mark82 said:
I'd stick with the same system as last night. Felt more solid at the back to me with more threat going forward, albeit against a poor team.

Wednesday have taken 10 points from the last 5 games, including last night's result.

Sky_Blue_Dreamer · Jan 28, 2021

rob9872 said:
Pask did well, but is Dacosta injured? I'd rather see him in there, particularly if he does revert to a back 3 again. If 442 then either is fine.

When he was initially brought in it was as competition for Dabo. Personally see him long term as more of a centre back but atm has versatility to cover RB and possibly even DCM if necessary.

AOM · Jan 28, 2021

Same starting line up as last night, but Pask for Dabo and potentially Baka in for Biamou.

Allen unlucky to not start but happy for him to add fresh legs later on

Skybluebeliever · Jan 28, 2021

Same team with Pask for Dabo , de costa should be back training , but thought Pask did well as right back with his height as well to justify keeping place I heard fadz could be out for a couple of weeks but rose could make bench saturday
The only other consideration is Allen in for sheaf

PUSB-We_are_going_up · Jan 28, 2021

41212
Wilson
Pask - Osti - Fadz - McCallum
Sheaf
Hamer - James
O’hare
Biamou - Gyokeres

Hobo · Jan 28, 2021

AFCCOVENTRY said:
Just Pask for Dabo and 4-4-2. Wouldn’t change a winning team.

Except it was not 4-4-2

Magwitch · Jan 28, 2021

Dabo certain to be out, the flat back four worked and Pask is a better at full back than wing back imo. Keep the same team only question for me Sheaf or Allen think I’d start with Sheaf.
Managers choice Marosi or Wilson for me Marosi is our number one.

Briles · Jan 28, 2021

Surely we wil have to put newton on the bench sat, was suprised he wasnt in the squad yesterday given we have nobody who can play leftback except Mcallum.

Sky Blue Harry H · Jan 28, 2021

AOM said:
Same starting line up as last night, but Pask for Dabo and potentially Baka in for Biamou.

Allen unlucky to not start but happy for him to add fresh legs later on

Pretty much what I was thinking. I'd try Baka on the basis of him looking a bit fresher for his cameo, then can alternate him and Max during the busy run of games. Maybe give one an hour, then let the other bust a gut for for the last 30 mins.

AOM · Jan 28, 2021

Sky Blue Harry H said:
Pretty much what I was thinking. I'd try Baka on the basis of him looking a bit fresher for his cameo, then can alternate him and Max during the busy run of games. Maybe give one an hour, then let the other bust a gut for for the last 30 mins.

Yeah I agree.
Didn't think Max was awful last night but he looked absolutely knackered whereas Baka had some energy and stretched play a bit more

SleepyGinger · Jan 28, 2021

Paxman II said:
.................................WILSON....................................
..........McFAZDEAN......OOSTIGARRD.......HYAM.....
PASK......................................................Mc.CALLUM
..................HAMER............JAMES..............................
.....................ALLEN......O'HARE................................
............................GYOKERES.....................................

Thoughts?

This but hopefully dacosta at rwb, pask done well but better full back than wingback

SleepyGinger · Jan 28, 2021

Hobo said:
Except it was not 4-4-2

Looked like a narrow 4-3-3 for the most part I thought

Johhny Blue · Jan 28, 2021

Paxman II said:
.................................WILSON....................................
..........McFAZDEAN......OOSTIGARRD.......HYAM.....
PASK......................................................Mc.CALLUM
..................HAMER............JAMES..............................
.....................ALLEN......O'HARE................................
............................GYOKERES.....................................

Thoughts?

Is Thoughts our only sub?

Gibbo · Jan 28, 2021

4-3-3 or 4-3-2-1 doesn't matter which in reality

Wilson/Marosi: (No fussed either way)

Pask-Ost-MacF-Sam Mac: (Pask deserves the nod)

James-Sheaf-Hamer: (Sheaf to play in front of the back 4)

O'Hare-Victor-Allen.

Did a long post on another thread explaining the logic, which it looks like a lot of people saw, so won't reprint it.

But I'd do the above

clint van damme · Jan 28, 2021

Hobo said:
Except it was not 4-4-2

The selection was basically 4 4 2 though the actual formation was more fluid.

JulianDarbyFTW · Jan 28, 2021

clint van damme said:
The selection was basically 4 4 2 though the actual formation was more fluid.

My take was that VG was playing left midfield out of possession and striker in possession, so 451 transitioning to 442. And VG certainly seems to have the engine on him to play that role. Thought it was a very astute tactic tbf.

clint van damme · Jan 28, 2021

JulianDarbyFTW said:
My take was that VG was playing left midfield out of possession and striker in possession, so 451 transitioning to 442. And VG certainly seems to have the engine on him to play that role. Thought it was a very astute tactic tbf.

That was my reading of it but on a basic level we picked 4 defenders 4 midfielders and two strikers.

Hobo · Jan 28, 2021

I think it was more 4-3-3 or
4-3-2-1

Speedies_Chips · Jan 28, 2021

Johhny Blue said:
Is Thoughts our only sub?

Saving him for the 89th minute.

Frostie · Jan 28, 2021

Hobo said:
I think it was more 4-3-3 or
4-3-2-1

Yeah. Like a 4-1-4-1 when defending & a fluid 4-3-3 when attacking with Gyokeres & particularly O'Hare given quite a bit of freedom.
Massive credit to those 2, you could see they really busted a gut to get back into position as soon as possession was turned over.

Look at Gyokeres (12) average position & the majority of his touches were on the left flank too (including some good defensive work).
No way was he "up top" in a traditional sense:

ccfc1234 · Jan 30, 2021

We need to keep with two recognised forwards on the pitch again. We look a far more dangerous team trying to win games, surprisingly.

PUSB-We_are_going_up · Jan 30, 2021

Magwitch said:
Dabo certain to be out, the flat back four worked and Pask is a better at full back than wing back imo. Keep the same team only question for me Sheaf or Allen think I’d start with Sheaf.
Managers choice Marosi or Wilson for me Marosi is our number one.

Why would he drop Wilson when Wilson kept a clean sheet against Wednesday

Team for Brum? (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Super Moderator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency