Most of us don't constantly give him shit. When he plays well we praise him and when he plays badly, like the last two games he featured in, then we rightly criticise him.Murphy has been here all season and why do we constantly give him shit are we forgetting he's chipped in with 8/9 goals god only how many assists he ripped Gillingham apart without AA.Give the lad a break stop rotating the team.To be fair it's gone tits up since JC signed
I'm really finding it hard to work out why so many more midfield players are being brought in. Theres a breakdown somewhere and I feel the lack of team chemistry is really preventing us scoring the goals we were earlier in the season. Its so rare to see the same team starting multiple games in a row and it concerns me.
Albeit we need defensive back up as we cannot keep clean sheets, but what was wrong with the attacking options that started the season? We consistently played Armstrong infront of O'Brien, Maddison and Lameiras, with Fleck and Vince behind. And it worked. They ripped teams apart time and time again. Surely a biproduct of that was their chemistry, always knew where they were and what each was about to do, where they would run etc etc.
Then Murphy and Kent arrived and replaced Lamerias and frequently JOB, while Madders was injured too, and we lost a lot of potency, scraped through a number of wins without really scoring all that much outside of a couple of big score games. Now we are struggling to find real chances all of a sudden so when they don't all go in we are up the creek.
Maybe its time to pick a side, stick with it for a few weeks and use subs a bit more to keep legs fresh. Leave Murphy as a power-sub for a bit as I really think his priorities are for himself and not the team which hurts us frequently, and try and build that chemistry. I wonder if bringing in Rose and Hunt and whoever else is being looked at will just leave TM too many options he might feel need to be rotated, further decreasing the chance of that chemistry evolving?
Someone's been playing FIFA.
Came to post this. Maybe that's why Bigi is there, but he's too many positions away from Arma. Obviously we need to play him in the number 10 slot so we get full chemistry for him.
Has he played RB I'm sure he has,might not be a bad shout that.I think the only reason he's here is because Armstrong is and we are stuck with him.
If we have to play him then we should seriously look at right back. He's awful in midfield.
I think the only reason he's here is because Armstrong is and we are stuck with him.
If we have to play him then we should seriously look at right back. He's awful in midfield.
Has he played RB I'm sure he has,might not be a bad shout that.
Ok,why not then he isn't the answer in Flecks role he hasn't the vision and just doesn't get us goingPlayed there for Newcastle U21s apparently.
I think the only reason he's here is because Armstrong is and we are stuck with him.
If we have to play him then we should seriously look at right back. He's awful in midfield.
Ok,why not then he isn't the answer in Flecks role he hasn't the vision and just doesn't get us going
Agreed so as others have said why not give him a chance at RBTM has said Bigi is a different type of player to Fleck but can still pass the ball well. He has also suggested that Rose has impressed him but is perhaps still very tactically raw and lacks positional discipline.
So on Saturday he probably felt Bigi was the best option we had to replace Fleck. I am sure if Fleck is available he plays every time.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?