For the life of me I did not see how WASP stance was in anyway helpful to their own cause in the first place. The EC complaint will run regardless.
To lose a tenant and the windfall of cash that brings with it is utterly foolish. And their own standing in the community will be trashed.
CCFC have a deal ready to run at St Andrews all confirmed. WASP may have thought SISU would not actually pull it off.
So nothing would surprise me if there was an 11th hour change of minds.
How do you know he's not on the wind up?
Did he say he wasn't?!
According to the post by Nick from Tynan Scope the talks never stopped and a deal could still be done. Stop listening to all those wankers who "think they know something" and accept it from a bloke inside the Club.
???????????Conversing but not talking?????I don't think talks will be back on. But I'm sure there have been conversations between parties.
Or from someone with, the mole, in their name!
When I say 'ring' I mean my circle of truth, so the bunny is in my circle of truth. He's all ears.
To me, Robins' article seems to be slating the council more than Wasps.Robins has now come our slating wasps.
Looks like the club have gone on the offensive on the day ST details are released, good!
To me, Robins' article seems to be slating the council more than Wasps.
I'm not getting any hopes up but the could just be pressure on Wasps. Show them the club has had to move on, season tickets on sale, players signed and public opinion turning against them. Let them go away, look at their finances and see if they drop the mad indemnity stuff.I can't see the talks being back on, Robins and Boddy both sound pretty resigned to Birmingham
I'm not getting any hopes up but the could just be pressure on Wasps. Show them the club has had to move on, season tickets on sale, players signed and public opinion turning against them. Let them go away, look at their finances and see if they drop the mad indemnity stuff.
Does anyone have any evidence of the indemnity stuff?
I tried explaining it to someone yesterday and they said they have not heard anything about it, but I couldn't find a link to prove it.
Does anyone have any evidence of the indemnity stuff?
I tried explaining it to someone yesterday and they said they have not heard anything about it, but I couldn't find a link to prove it.
Yes, I interpreted it similarly. That it's not so much that talks halted under any acrimonious circumstances but rather there was nothing more to talk about with neither side ready to budge on the impasse of idemnity, and so talks are open if either side's stance changes.There’s a difference between talks being on and a deal being close. Read the Tynan Scope statement. It states that talks didn’t stop, the issue is that wasps want CCFC/SISU to cover for them if the EC finds anything, and CCFC/SISU can’t agree to that. So maybe talks are still happening, but until wasps drop this term, they won’t get anywhere.
As mentioned before it's in the statements but you can take further proof that London Wasps haven't tried to dispute it in their statements.Does anyone have any evidence of the indemnity stuff?
I tried explaining it to someone yesterday and they said they have not heard anything about it, but I couldn't find a link to prove it.
Where is Tim Fisher gone?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Uh yeah.Is he still chairman?
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
No it doesn’tIt's the hope that kills you.
It is if it was Mr.Jefferson Hope.No it doesn’t
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?