Nope, just thought I'd make a thread not about nopm and its all over the news today.
Want my thoughts on this well here goes........
This thread should be in the 'off topic' forum. You should know better Nick
Any land that needs decontamination should involve Ccfc and Tescos.
I have never agreed with any government trampling over its people or any other country being "invaded" by another. And I'll be very controversial as well: the Spanish should claim back Gibraltar and the Falklands should be Argentinian.
No way should we get involved with Syria, It seems to me that the likes of William Hague can't wait to get us involved.
I know this may not be a popular view, but somethings not quite right about this chemical attack. With Americans stance on the use of chemical weapons and the UN chemical weapons team visiting, I can't see how Assad would be stupid enough to carry out something like this now. A rebel attack like this would bring the help and support they need.
Toche!! I agree... I smell a rat... It all a setup in there plan to invade Iran. If they do go in, then mark my word it will not be a walk in the park like Iraq was.
Another question for people with short memories is where is the evidence that Saddam had WMD??
It's Politics...there is usually a rat involved."I smell a rat..."
comment - there will be a SISU style umbrella strategy in place for achieving "stability" in the region."all a setup in there plan to invade Iran"
...not much of a walk in the park for those who were killed or injured/traumatised. I think I understand your point though."it will not be a walk in the park like Iraq was"
...aha, there's one rat!"CaMoron"
...err there was sufficiently convincing evidence of WOMDs before the Iraq invasion."What I want to ask is where is the evidence that Assads regime used chemical these weapons"
...is it?"It is known fact that the rebels also possess chemical agents"
Are the "majority foreign"? Or are you believing the media (fatal error beyond the headline of almost any story...by paragraph 2 speculation usually kicks-in). Also, can/should we take the "Turkish officials" word? Is their word better than Syria's or US's word?"Only recently a number of these rebels who are majority foreign insurgence were intercepted by Turkish officials carrying toxic chemical agents"
...we don't know that, & we will have to wait an indeterminable time for it to be uncovered if that was the case."How do we know if an undercover chemical factory run by the rebels was hit during the Syrian air raids"
Something could be happening soon. Some lads in the army have had their leave cancelled.
I am all for human rights, but should our lads have to go into all these countries all the time?
Very impressed with Ed Milliband's comments when he says ' US, UK close ties should not depend on the UK doing what the US president says should happen !!' Fair play Ed !
Just for a little balance on this.....Securing many British (company) owned oilfields will protect us from (even more) fuel hikes. The major investment that always comes at the end of any war to repair/create infrastructure will typically go to those that helped win that war.
We are talking big money here. Money that would save jobs or maybe even create a few.
It a very fine economic arguement..Ask Kellogg Brown and Root
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?