James Smith
Well-Known Member
It's PWKH they're scared of clearly
funny they aint trying to get the courts to force acl/ccc hand over those alleged minutes from that alleged meeting where they allegedly reneged on an alleged deal over the ACL mortgage etc.
It's PWKH they're scared of clearly. First they claim he's MMM in some paranoid delusion and now when he goes on CWR for the first time in ages, SISU go back to the courts faster than you can say Sixfields.
Acl are we???
Why would they want to force them out ?
Some people on here are either stupid or Tim Fisher !!
They care about the club, its CCC ACL the City and worst of all the fans they dont give a .... about!Does anyone still believe SISU give a f+++ about the football club.
ACL own our stadium.
It's never been "our" stadium, it's theirs.
So why did you go then?
But refuse to go to the cesspit thats not ours ether.
Oh and it was ours for a while until we asked a charity to help us out and then fucked them.
If you want me to make a choice between ACL and sisu then 100% ACL.
Under a different owner of CCFC I would want CCFC to own the Stadium complete with lease and freehold.
Now that will have CONFUSED you.:blue:
ACL own our stadium.
It's never been "our" stadium, it's theirs.
So acl.are classed as we? Very strange.
It's never been "our" stadium, it's theirs.
So acl.are classed as we? Very strange.
ACL is 50% owned by the council. I certainly count the council as closer to we than some unknown hedge fund.
Don't you ?
Not really, I don't see either as we. I just see the club and fans as we. I think people are only saying that as it is against sisu. I don't see many counting the council as we when it comes to mp dodgy expenses and other council outrages.
Not really, I don't see either as we. I just see the club and fans as we. I think people are only saying that as it is against sisu. I don't see many counting the council as we when it comes to mp dodgy expenses and other council outrages.
It's never been "our" stadium, it's theirs.
If you are a coventry tax payer it is ours.
If you are a coventry tax payer it is ours.
Ahh one of those. Had much of a payment or rebate from the profits? Can you come and go as you please? The tax payer owns that as and has much ownership as they do the san siri.
On the technicality it was tax payers money, do they own it or have any say?
Name one council outrage worse than coventry city football club been taken to Northampton.
The club will NEVER own the stadium, so answer the question. Would you prefer SISU or CCC to own the stadium in YOUR City ?
Before the council haters get too carried away by the prospect of SISU getting their judicial review, it is perhaps worth considering what such a "victory" would mean.
It would allow SISU to have the reasons for the loan reviewed and for them to present a case as to why the decision to facilitate the refunding of the mortgage was illegal. For SISU to get their case together and for a date to be set for the review could easily take another 12 months and with this hanging over both parties, it is doubtful if any return to the Ricoh would be possible.
Even if the review did decide that the council's action was illegal, it does not follow that SISU suffered an injury as a result.
So, success for SISU at the appeal would probably mean no CCFC at the Ricoh until at least 2015 and no guarantee of SISU getting anything except large legal bills.
Still, it's cheaper than building a new stadium.
Name one council outrage worse than coventry city football club been taken to Northampton.
And if Sisu win the case?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?