and that, that stat is going to remain in place forever.
Sad but true I feel.
60 games
13 wins
20 draws
27 loses
Win percentage 21.67%
Worst? Statistically I guess. Personally i think Phil Neal takes some beating.
He has gone, let's draw a line under it and move on eh ?
I'm not trying to have a go, I'm actually pointing out that it's very sad and that I can't see anyone ever doing any worse statistically.
Not trying to score points just saying it's a shame and that his record will never ever be beaten.
Lies ,damn lies and statistics someone once said
Would rather watch a Thorn side than a Hoofroyd side everytime
That stat must be recorded with the fact that he also managed the club during the most turbulent period of its history to level it out a bit
That he will, and he has few reasons to complain.
Utter shite. He has more to complain about, resources wise, than any City Manager in history.
Resources don't account for the disparity between home and away results. To focus on resources is to overlook the factor that really did him in - the away record.
And the away record had nothing to do with inexperienced kids defending for their lives did it?
Otis, you're shit stirring here and you know it!
Stats mean nothing without context.
Where are the stats for each manager and how much they were given to spend? Or which manager had most of his key players sold? It's all relative.
You know it is though. I'm wasting my breath!
And the away record had nothing to do with inexperienced kids defending for their lives did it?
And the away record had nothing to do with inexperienced kids defending for their lives did it?
You make it sound as though we fielded an entire team of children, bizarre hyperbole once again.
Strachan was a good Manager until McAllister and Keane went - now he's continually slated. He was still the same man who'd given us 'The Entertainers' when we got relegated. It's all about context.
Otis, you're shit stirring here and you know it!
Stats mean nothing without context.
Where are the stats for each manager and how much they were given to spend? Or which manager had most of his key players sold? It's all relative.
You know it is though. I'm wasting my breath!
Defence of Keogh Cranie Hussey with Murphy as back up? Christie yes but he preferred him to Wood. Still the answer to the question will be answered in basic economic terms of supply and demand. Thorn is available to 91 clubs - how many will demand his services.
You're actually going there? That somehow these professional footballers become lesser beings when they play away from home? Maybe the question you ought to be asking yourself is why they were having to defend so much away from home...
Not shit stirring at all. Why do you say that? I have said several times that I find the whole thing saddening.
I was not shit stirring just wondering if we will ever see such low stats again ever.
Because we didn't have decent cover on the bench? Because we were forced to field unfit players half the time? Because we weren't able to compete with clubs that could bring the likes of Kevin Phillips off the bench to change a game? Because young players don't have the same mental strength and leadership qualities?
Listen - last year's resources weren't acceptable for a club trying to stay up. The club have even admitted it - so anyone saying otherwise is talking rubbish.
Worst? Statistically I guess. Personally i think Phil Neal takes some beating.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?