@GIMOC gone abit quiet…Weird that
Looks like he’s doing an interview with Andy Turner at the moment. That must be frosty
View attachment 39429
Joy had some nice handbags to be fairYou love Sisu
Your information contradicts other ITK tidbits here and one of the sources is incorrect. There’s a thread called ‘.’ (Edited by OP) where the insinuation is that this was forced on Robins. Someone’s ITK source is incorrect so I trust your info 50%.
There’s information wars at the club and there are sources have certain biased spins that they’re telling people like yourself.
Likewise, some ‘ITK’ info I’ve been privy to AV is probably wrong too. Based on Doug King’s comments earlier, MR didn’t want to work with AV there’s no insinuation that he was sacked for gross misconduct.
Maybe it was true but from MR’s POV’s rather than the club as a whole and the sources version of events is tilted towards certain characters at the clubs.
Your average company doesn't have thousands of very visible and vocaC stakeholders like a football club does TBF
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tarhpatalk
He owns it but it's our club not his.this is kind of lost on people- whether on purpose who knows but probably.
This is his club. The buck stops with him, and what a mess he’s overseen here.
WHat something? People would have been furious if a new manager had been appointed the day after Robins was sacked.The only weird thing he appeared to imply was that having no manager was better than having Robins. When he was pressed on why he had nobody lined up to replace him he hid behind the "well that would've been disrespectful" line. Something didn't sit right with that
To be fair regardless of who’s right or wrong on what happened with this, Chris Ramsey didn’t exactly fill me with any sort of confidence that he would have been the elite coach to turn things round.With regard to the Chris Ramsey episode, I’d be 100% confident that US is bang on the money.
To be fair I don’t doubt your source but wonder if his interview didn’t do as great as he thought it did.Chris and I have a mutual friend. An ex pro (England International) that previously worked with Chris.
I don’t have an opinion either way. All I’m saying is what happened doesn’t appear to jive with what was said tonight.
Chris and I have a mutual friend. An ex pro (England International) that previously worked with Chris.
I don’t have an opinion either way. All I’m saying is what happened doesn’t appear to jive with what was said tonight.
Doug says its solely him who's running the club, that is worrying, don't most clubs have chief execs, directors etc. Some caller also mentioned Doug is being backed from somewhere which is what I've thought from when he first took over. Is someone whispering in his ear
Admit it your sources were wrong. You therefore unintentionally misled fans.Not really
common theme in all this.
the last 18 months we’ve seen everyone bar Dean austin leave from Lawrence to robins to boddy
all under king regime
just think about that. why is that? when they all worked fine before that
Then you have Austin next to him tonight (unsure why) and king said the fitness of the players is the best it’s been according to the data down to the performance director
GDPR breach thereLooks like he’s doing an interview with Andy Turner at the moment. That must be frosty
View attachment 39429
Yea but doug king has said what he's said and it's all exactly correct , no conversations were held face to face and everything is as he said ..
All robins fault
Admit it your sources were wrong. You therefore unintentionally misled fans.
He can speak to as many people as he likes, at the end of the day he is solely in chargeAy? He openly said he wants to get a DOF in to do the football side.
He said he speaks to a lot of people for advice who are in the game as well.
Maybe that adds weight to the idea that this sacking was planned, and it was therefore not a good idea to add an assistant if he might be sacked within weeksChris and I have a mutual friend. An ex pro (England International) that previously worked with Chris.
I don’t have an opinion either way. All I’m saying is what happened doesn’t appear to jive with what was said tonight.
No one was ever going to ask positive forward thinking questions unfortunately.I would have been interested to hear a lot more about the proposed role of head coach and what the difference is between that and Robins' role.
Yet we heard fuck all about it because of the the shite questions from both the audience and some of the CWR representatives.
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
No , but who can prove what was said face to face with somebody is my pointDid he say no conversations were held?
This is ridiculous we're going down the "usual suspects", "Sisu apologists" road now. This is why we need to move on now. We've had our say, Kings had his, whether we believe him or not, it's done now. No need for supporters to rip lumps out of each other.
"Shot him a memo"
Maybe that adds weight to the idea that this sacking was planned, and it was therefore not a good idea to add an assistant if he might be sacked within weeks
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
The job was advertised at head of first team coaching - perhaps they didn't think that it would be assistant managerHis point about the calibre of people they interviewed for the no.2 position, but didn’t appoint as no one wanted to be a no.2 and wanted to be a no.1, why did they apply in the first place?
He didn’t say they were crap. He said we need an elite tactician.Oh we’re in great shape. No manager, no manager in sight, no assistant manager, coaches that the owner just basically said are crap, huge division amongst the fanbase and an owner who has just made any applicant think twice about getting involved with this toxic shitshow. What’s not to like
He should know a few , apparantly they all applied for the number 2 but really managers role weeks agoHe didn’t say they were crap. He said we need an elite tactician.
Anyone still listening to CWR? Someone’s done something to Doug, he sounds different.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?