Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Super league nonsense (2 Viewers)

  • Thread starter wingy
  • Start date Dec 21, 2023
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 21, 2023
  • #71
shmmeee said:
Not with that attitude!

It’s only sacking them off if they won’t play ball. The entire sport is distorted around the needs of a few clubs. I’m not sure that’s as inevitable as you seem to think. Not am I sure it has anything to do with globalisation. It’s mostly greed and getting away with it because they threaten to fuck off. I’m saying fuck off then because the constant demands are getting too much. The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few.

And this isn’t sudden. I’ve been saying fuck off after the parachute payments and the academy stuff, and everything else. TBH it’s the joke of a fixture list that was the straw if anything.
Click to expand...
Kicking out the pyramid’s most profitable members is just going to suck out revenue from the rest of the league and intensify the financial pressure on the broadcasters etc - I imagine it would mean more disruption to the lower league teams, not less. It’s not a particularly fair system, but again - it’s a pyramid!
 
T

TewkesburySkyBlue

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 21, 2023
  • #72
AOM said:
Wouldn't be surprised to see some of the Saudi teams eventually getting in through some loophole as well
Click to expand...
That well known hotbed of football Saudi Arabia
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 21, 2023
  • #73
SBT said:
Kicking out the pyramid’s most profitable members is just going to suck out revenue from the rest of the league and intensify the financial pressure on the broadcasters etc - I imagine it would mean more disruption to the lower league teams, not less. It’s not a particularly fair system, but again - it’s a pyramid!
Click to expand...
They'd only be as profitable while they're in the the league system, soon to be replaced.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 21, 2023
  • #74
SBT said:
Kicking out the pyramid’s most profitable members is just going to suck out revenue from the rest of the league and intensify the financial pressure on the broadcasters etc - I imagine it would mean more disruption to the lower league teams, not less. It’s not a particularly fair system, but again - it’s a pyramid!
Click to expand...

…

I swear you’ve not read anything I have written. I want the revenue sucked out. It’s distorting the game and making clubs at our level unsustainable.

This is some proper trickle down bollocks.
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 21, 2023
  • #75
shmmeee said:
…

I swear you’ve not read anything I have written. I want the revenue sucked out. It’s distorting the game and making clubs at our level unsustainable.

This is some proper trickle down bollocks.
Click to expand...
It’s a literal pyramid scheme, of course it’s trickle down bollocks!

English football is not going to suddenly become a post-capitalist Corinthian utopia if you get rid of the big clubs. It will just become a poorer, more precarious version of its current self.
 
Reactions: Cov kid 55

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 21, 2023
  • #76
SBT said:
It’s a literal pyramid scheme, of course it’s trickle down bollocks!

English football is not going to suddenly become a post-capitalist Corinthian utopia if you get rid of the big clubs. It will just become a poorer, more precarious version of its current self.
Click to expand...

We have a very clear before and after thanks to the PL. All this money hasn’t made clubs more sustainable. And neither have any of the changes. I fail to see how the sport is less precarious today than in 1991
 
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 21, 2023
  • #77
It’s a non starter though isn’t it? Because of the bollocks last time the premier league/big 6 ended up pissing the country off that badly that they were made to sign a charter and the government are bringing in a regulator to ban this. The ECJ ruling doesn’t affect the English leagues and therefore the big 6 can’t join.

without the English clubs (specifically United and possibly Liverpool) this super league won’t get off the ground.
 
Reactions: Cov kid 55
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 22, 2023
  • #78
shmmeee said:
We have a very clear before and after thanks to the PL. All this money hasn’t made clubs more sustainable. And neither have any of the changes. I fail to see how the sport is less precarious today than in 1991
Click to expand...
So you would rather go back to the pre-1991 version of English football? And you think that will thrive in 2024?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 22, 2023
  • #79
SBT said:
So you would rather go back to the pre-1991 version of English football? And you think that will thrive in 2024?
Click to expand...

I think it’s more viable now with streaming than it was then, but yes. I mean we aren’t the only viable league system on the planet.
 

slowpoke

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 22, 2023
  • #80
SBT said:
So you would rather go back to the pre-1991 version of English football? And you think that will thrive in 2024?
Click to expand...
Yes it would in England, most fans don’t support the big 6, and today any club can climb the pyramid, look at Bournemouth they are the prime example, there are others.
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 22, 2023
  • #81
slowpoke said:
Yes it would in England, most fans don’t support the big 6, and today any club can climb the pyramid, look at Bournemouth they are the prime example, there are others.
Click to expand...

Bournemouth who’s rise was funded by a Russian with interest free loans to the club? Not sure you’ve thought this one through.
 

slowpoke

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 23, 2023
  • #82
What I am saying is nowadays any club in the country from Carlisle to Exeter to Torquay can climb the leagues and quick with the right sugar daddy, doesn’t matter if he’s from Russia or Timbuktu.
I thought the guy initially behind Bournemouths climb through the leagues was an American billionaire who passed away suddenly
then others got involved
Only 15 years ago they were rock bottom in the fourth division.
 

Irish Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 23, 2023
  • #83
The difference between now and pre PL is that is that clubs could reach the top without having a billionaire owner. Their rise would be down to the talent of the manager and his skill in putting a competitive team together, helped by the fact that in those days there was no freedom of contract. It’s hard to see any club of the stature of say Northampton, who in the sixties had successive promotions from the fourth to the first division without any particular financial backing, rising from bottom to top.(I haven’t forgotten about Luton but would argue they are a bigger club than most in Leagues 1 and 2).
Even harder to see a club, newly promoted to the top division actually winning it as both Ipswich in the sixties and Forest in the seventies did, purely down to the talent of their managers.
Money has totally skewed football. If you don’t have the billionaire backer then I think there is a ceiling that it is almost impossible to break through. This certainly wasn’t the case when I first started watching football and I think the game as a competition is worse because of this.
 
Reactions: Blind-Faith
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 23, 2023
  • #84
Irish Sky Blue said:
The difference between now and pre PL is that is that clubs could reach the top without having a billionaire owner. Their rise would be down to the talent of the manager and his skill in putting a competitive team together, helped by the fact that in those days there was no freedom of contract. It’s hard to see any club of the stature of say Northampton, who in the sixties had successive promotions from the fourth to the first division without any particular financial backing, rising from bottom to top.(I haven’t forgotten about Luton but would argue they are a bigger club than most in Leagues 1 and 2).
Even harder to see a club, newly promoted to the top division actually winning it as both Ipswich in the sixties and Forest in the seventies did, purely down to the talent of their managers.
Money has totally skewed football. If you don’t have the billionaire backer then I think there is a ceiling that it is almost impossible to break through. This certainly wasn’t the case when I first started watching football and I think the game as a competition is worse because of this.
Click to expand...
Or just a bit of brawn ?
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 23, 2023
  • #85
wingy said:
Or just a bit of brawn ?
Click to expand...
Maybe this free flowing thing the refs are doing is not so bad, take SU last night or the 60's70's Leeds Chelsea, even us Liverpool, Middlesbrough man city Derby?
 
V

vin10

Member
  • Dec 23, 2023
  • #86
Skyblueweeman said:
Of course. If you win an EPL title with no Man City, Liverpool, Chelsea etc, of course it devalues it.

The FA Cup was devalued the year Utd chose not to enter.
Click to expand...
Going to be devalued even more with top clubs wanting an end to replays...
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 3 (members: 0, guests: 3)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?