It was the telegraph misreporting again
It was the telegraph misreporting again
To be fair while the fee would be ridiculous, we would at least have a young cdm who can play the holding midfielder role and mean we could sell sheaf next year without panicking.My worry is we got gazumped on Stamenic and Madsen, so we have another far enough along in the pipeline? I really don’t want a Kitching situation where we sign Kyprianou for £8m on deadline day.
Agree with both comments. Would like Kyprianou but whilst Doug has got a reputation for being a strong negotiator I'd also argue he's proved he will pay over the odds on deadline day (Kitching and Mason Clarke).To be fair while the fee would be ridiculous, we would at least have a young cdm who can play the holding midfielder role and mean we could sell sheaf next year without panicking.
Leicester played 4-3-3 last year with no 10, you can say sorry to T&BI’m not sure why you are choosing to die on this hill but he’s not a CDM. Matesca said last season that he lacked the defensive qualities to play deeper.
It's open from his quote on Friday, just the usual denial from a coach really!I thought read somewhere that Robins has suggested there will be no more incomings, anyone else seen something to suggest like this?
yeah, no coaches is going to say at this stage "we're absolutely gagging for a couple signings this week".It's open from his quote on Friday, just the usual denial from a coach really!
Maybe I'm being arrogant here but if we really really wanted Madsen I think we would have beaten QPR, suggests to me that QPR have either paid well over the odds to beat us or our recruitment just decided he wasn't right for us and hopefully that means someone else is already lined up.My worry is we got gazumped on Stamenic and Madsen, so we have another far enough along in the pipeline? I really don’t want a Kitching situation where we sign Kyprianou for £8m on deadline day.
Leicester played with KDH as their most advanced midfielder not Casedi. When he came on he played as an additional forward threat.Leicester played 4-3-3 last year with no 10, you can say sorry to T&B
not what we needIlias Chair rumoured to be leaving QPR, Leeds are apparently interested.
We couldn't, could we?
I thought that's who we had signed last week when the club posted a picture of a seat with a shirt on the back, but it turned out to be Bassette.Ilias Chair rumoured to be leaving QPR, Leeds are apparently interested.
We couldn't, could we?
He isn't the cdm style midfielder we needMaybe I'm being arrogant here but if we really really wanted Madsen I think we would have beaten QPR, suggests to me that QPR have either paid well over the odds to beat us or our recruitment just decided he wasn't right for us and hopefully that means someone else is already lined up.
No they didn'tLeicester played with KDH as their most advanced midfielder not Casedi. When he came on he played as an additional forward threat.
Apology accepted.
No they didn't
There was no 10, there were 2 8s and a 6
8s can play further forward and usually 1 one will ne deeper and 1 more forward
Still if you want to be wrong yet again so be it
Sent from my SM-G991B using Tapatalk
I didn’t say they played with a 10.
What is all this 6, 8 10 stuff , I still think of players as defenders ,midfielders, strikers or wide men.
What is all this 6, 8 10 stuff , I still think of players as defenders ,midfielders, strikers or wide men.
That's me an old git
2, 4, 6, 8, never too late!! Tom Robinson Band
It’s joined the footballing dictionary with:What is all this 6, 8 10 stuff , I still think of players as defenders ,midfielders, strikers or wide men.
Sadly no mention of the Sheringham role. Lost to history.It’s joined the footballing dictionary with:
Low block
Mid block
High press
Patterns of play
Second phase
Highly rated
Yes. It got embedded somewhere in the patterns of play section.Sadly no mention of the Sheringham role. Lost to history.
What about a false no 9Yes. It got embedded somewhere in the patterns of play section.
That’s in the same category as:What about a false no 9
Inverted fullbacks ?That’s in the same category as:
Raumdeuter
Mezzala
Trequartista
Segundo volante
Carrilero
What is all this 6, 8 10 stuff , I still think of players as defenders ,midfielders, strikers or wide men.
And this was a No.4
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?