But is he adequate back up? We don't know because apart from the spell under AB he's never had a decent turn in the side.
Our defence has been poor this season, just 4 clean sheets and regularly gifting teams 3-4 good chances a game, shouldn't our back up players be pushing really hard for a start?
But is he adequate back up? We don't know because apart from the spell under AB he's never had a decent turn in the side.
Our defence has been poor this season, just 4 clean sheets and regularly gifting teams 3-4 good chances a game, shouldn't our back up players be pushing really hard for a start?
So are we getting so many goals without getting any chances?
Little secret for you. When you attack like we do you leave yourself open. You get more chances than the other team. On averages you will win more than you lose. Or would you prefer to defend when you have the better players?
Yes it is adequate, when your winning games your not gonna change the team are you? When Cameron played badly and we lost against Brentford robins changed it and he kept it like that since.
We can't afford to get another cb. Lb defo then another striker then we probs won't have much money left
The question is if wood or edj have a season ending injury would you be confident with Cameron as a replacement. I would be doubtful.
The question is if wood or edj have a season ending injury would you be confident with Cameron as a replacement. I would be doubtful.
I would.
Having seen how he dealt with Marlon king.
I would be confident with Malaga as well.
However that won't happen MR is pissed off with him.
Because he played very well against one if the best teams in our division.
Then has an average second half against one of the worst.
Like all of our team did.
Then the manager who signed him was sacked the rest is history.
Fair crack if the whip for Malaga?
You aren't slightly curious about a player who has only played 10 games at this level? Thorn picked him ahead of edj. Enough said.
I thought he was defensively weak agai st Sheffield and against Bury looked like a Sunday league player - which is where he has been most of his career.
You did say that about him against Sheff Utd, tbf to you.
However as everyone else was raving about his performance you were as normal on you own
I wouldn't agreeCan we not? The only position we don't agree on is whether sheff or fleck/Barton should play. The rest of the side pretty much picks itself.
I wouldn't agree
Clarke/Christie debate will carry on
For me I hope to see Thomas come into the first team over Jennings when he is fit enough, Fleck has added more to the debate with his last few games in central midfield
Then as you say the Fleck/Sheff/Barton debate will continue
And currently the striker shirt is up for grabs with Mcgoldrick leaving, I know Clarke has came in but if he doesn't start off well we have Elliott waiting to come in
over the last 10-15 games yes because Mcgoldrick was a definite pick and Jennings/Bailey had no competition in centre mid although I would still say over the last 10-15 games there had been varying opinion still on weather Clarke or Christie should play right backI disagree in the last 10-15 games there has been very debate about the starting line up apart from the sheffers-fleck-Barton for attacking midfield.
The Thomas debate is brand new off the back off today's cameo, and no one would have been mentioning Elliott had he not got a brace against MK Dons and McG going. Am
People have only suggested Christie needs a rest the last couple of games.
If the "majority" are always right Richard Shaw would be manager after his first game and we would have signed lee mills ( oh we did).
I disagree in the last 10-15 games there has been very debate about the starting line up apart from the sheffers-fleck-Barton for attacking midfield.
The Thomas debate is brand new off the back off today's cameo, and no one would have been mentioning Elliott had he not got a brace against MK Dons and McG going. Am
People have only suggested Christie needs a rest the last couple of games.
Sorry Stu reading this I presume you are making the point there is healthy competition in our squad.
No not really.
Elliott is in contention because Mcgoldrick gone.
Clarke is in contention because Christie has been poor.
Ditto people are starting to get on Jennings back after today's performance.
So really 3 of those 4 debated positions are because there's either a vacant position or a player has been in poor form.
The only position I ever seem to see debated on here on a regular basis is sheff's vs fleck/Barton.
That's the idea someone, loses form gets injured buggers off gets suspended all the reasons why a player is no longer there and the replacement does detract from the strength if your team by a devastating effect.
Having a player that can replace someone is different from healthy competition. The last 10-15 games we've had the same starting line up 95% of the time. People have come in as replacements but not performed well enough to make to make that position their own.
Elliott, Barton and Fleck have all done well at times when they have been called upon over the last 10 games. Ok Barton was poor at Preston but so was the whole side. He did ok at Doncaster, Elliott did well at MK Dons and Fleck imo did ok in the last two league gamesHaving a player that can replace someone is different from healthy competition. The last 10-15 games we've had the same starting line up 95% of the time. People have come in as replacements but not performed well enough to make to make that position their own.
Elliott, Barton and Fleck have all done well at times when they have been called upon over the last 10 games. Ok Barton was poor at Preston but so was the whole side. He did ok at Doncaster, Elliott did well at MK Dons and Fleck imo did ok in the last two league games
Agreed, I think Fleck was better than "ok", I think he was arguably our best player v MKD and STFC.
Elliott, Barton and Fleck have all done well at times when they have been called upon over the last 10 games. Ok Barton was poor at Preston but so was the whole side. He did ok at Doncaster, Elliott did well at MK Dons and Fleck imo did ok in the last two league games
I'm glad you said arguably.
He was poor against Shrewsbury.
Agreed, I think Fleck was better than "ok", I think he was arguably our best player v MKD and STFC.
Sheffers was easily our best player against Shrewsbury followed by Adams.
May I add to that...
McSheff played well 1st half, Fleck came off, he played shit as well.
Fleck also can dictate the tempo of which we play, very, very underrated by some.
And very very overrated by others.
I think the fact that he is our top assister by 2, in less games than the others, 2 less than Sheff, god knows how many behind Baker and Bailey, would suggest I don't overrate him as much as you underrate him...
I was waiting for that exact reply
Where would you play him?
possibly, I would like to include fleck in the team. Worth a try, another option woul be that same midfield 3 with moussa an Sheff on the wings'Free role', behind the striker.
After today's performances, I'd look to start a midfield 5 of:
Baker Bailey Fleck Thomas Moussa
I will admit, Sheff has been better, and is an unfortunate casualty, but it's either him, Moussa or Baker who has to go IMO. I'd definitely bring him on.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?