Suarez found guilty of racial abuse. (1 Viewer)

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/16186556.stm

Liverpool's Luis Suarez has been handed an eight-match ban and a £40,000 fine after being found guilty of racially abusing Manchester United's Patrice Evra by the Football Association.

------------------------------------------------------------

Good player but always hated the smarmy idiot after his handball against Ghana in the world cup.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
it doesnt matter scottie - he did it and he was found guilty, and imo the length of ban is justified. Racial abuse is a criminal offense. Perhaps Fergie decided not to say much in the media in case it jeopardized the case. That's why Anton Ferdinand hasn't said anything about the Terry incident.
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
LFC statement







Liverpool Football Club is very surprised and disappointed with the decision of the Football Association Commission to find Luis Suarez guilty of the charges against him.
spacer.gif



We look forward to the publication of the Commission's Judgment. We will study the detailed reasons of the Commission once they become available, but reserve our right to appeal or take any other course of action we feel appropriate with regards to this situation.

We find it extraordinary that Luis can be found guilty on the word of Patrice Evra alone when no-one else on the field of play - including Evra's own Manchester United teammates and all the match officials - heard the alleged conversation between the two players in a crowded Kop goalmouth while a corner kick was about to be taken.

The Club takes extremely seriously the fight against all forms of discrimination and has a long and successful track record in work relating to anti-racist activity and social inclusion. We remain committed to this ideal and equality for all, irrespective of a person's background.

LFC considers racism in any form to be unacceptable - without compromise. It is our strong held belief, having gone over the facts of the case, that Luis Suarez did not commit any racist act. It is also our opinion that the accusation by this particular player was not credible - certainly no more credible than his prior unfounded accusations.

It is key to note that Patrice Evra himself in his written statement in this case said 'I don't think that Luis Suarez is racist'. The FA in their opening remarks accepted that Luis Suarez was not racist.

Luis himself is of a mixed race family background as his grandfather was black. He has been personally involved since the 2010 World Cup in a charitable project which uses sport to encourage solidarity amongst people of different backgrounds with the central theme that the colour of a person's skin does not matter; they can all play together as a team.

He has played with black players and mixed with their families whilst with the Uruguay national side and was Captain at Ajax Amsterdam of a team with a proud multi-cultural profile, many of whom became good friends.

It seems incredible to us that a player of mixed heritage should be accused and found guilty in the way he has based on the evidence presented. We do not recognise the way in which Luis Suarez has been characterised.

It appears to us that the FA were determined to bring charges against Luis Suarez, even before interviewing him at the beginning of November. Nothing we have heard in the course of the hearing has changed our view that Luis Suarez is innocent of the charges brought against him and we will provide Luis with whatever support he now needs to clear his name.

We would also like to know when the FA intend to charge Patrice Evra with making abusive remarks to an opponent after he admitted himself in his evidence to insulting Luis Suarez in Spanish in the most objectionable of terms. Luis, to his credit, actually told the FA he had not heard the insult.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
What a load of bollocks in the Liverpool statement - he was found guilty of saying racially abuse comments at another player. End of.
 

MatthewWallis

Well-Known Member
Someone tell me where the evidence is? And also why is it acceptable for man united players to call evra whatever they called him, but when Suarez calls him it, it's racist?
 

ccfctommy

Well-Known Member
It wasn't caught on camera. No one heard him say anything racist.

It was basically Evra's word against Suarez's word.
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
I believe the FA would not have given a hefty punishment without evidence, also about his Man UTD team mates calling him it how would Suarez know this unless they were openly calling him it on the football pitch. According to a journalist in Uruguay the word is used alot and is only offensive if used in an argument, I don't believe in a UTD-L'pool game the word was being used in a non offensive way.

Verdict on the Terry case due today.
 

SkyBlueScottie

Well-Known Member
StuPot I dont think its as clear cut as you are making out, even the statements from Evra, and the FA prove it was a not an open and shut case.

On one hand its pretty clear he said something that may be acceptable in his and other countries, however I also understand that the FA need to lay out the law of the land and say such things are not acceptable in a British society. Its a tough one, I dare say that the ban will be reduced upon his appeal to 3 or 4 games, this will then show that the FA are prepared to act tough on racists, but then also show they are also aware of cultural difference in our game......

It would be interesting to know which United team mates also call Evra by the same name, I cant really see Rooney or Carrick calling him that.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
It may not be as cut and dry as that Scottie, but we haven't seen or heard all of the evidence. It doesn't matter whether it is acceptable in his country or not - kissing your partner in public is fine in the UK but if you did it in Dubai you'd get locked up.

Liverpool's defence is based on Saurez's word and the fact he captained a multicultural side. Being a racist and using racial abuse are not mutually exclusive. The FA believe that he did use racially abusive language therefore have punished him accordingly - I believe cultural differences were probably taken into account and had he been English it would have been longer.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top