Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Stuart Hall Arrested (6 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Nick
  • Start date Dec 5, 2012
Forums New posts
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Nick

Administrator
  • Dec 5, 2012
  • #1
How many more will be named?
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 5, 2012
  • #2
Fook me. Savile, DLT, Rolf Harris, Freddie Starr, Stuart Hall.

Who next, The Queen?
 

blueflint

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 5, 2012
  • #3
Otis said:
Fook me. Savile, DLT, Rolf Harris, Freddie Starr, Stuart Hall.

Who next, The Queen?
Click to expand...

cant they were innocent it was freddie mercury
 

deanocity3

New Member
  • Dec 5, 2012
  • #4
Stuart Hall and Eddie Waring had a up and under on It's a knockout
 

WillieStanley

New Member
  • Dec 5, 2012
  • #5
Otis said:
Fook me. Savile, DLT, Rolf Harris, Freddie Starr, Stuart Hall.

Who next, The Queen?
Click to expand...

Here's hoping!
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 5, 2012
  • #6
Otis said:
Fook me. Savile, DLT, Rolf Harris, Freddie Starr, Stuart Hall.

Who next, The Queen?
Click to expand...

Tim Fisher ,,,,,,,,,,, sorry different charges
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 5, 2012
  • #7
She's fooked the entire nation, men, women and children alike.
 

deanocity3

New Member
  • Dec 5, 2012
  • #8
blueflint said:
cant they were innocent it was freddie mercury
Click to expand...

Rolf Harris surely not.....
God yes he had 2 little boys
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 5, 2012
  • #9
Genuine quote from Stuart Hall on Fighting Talk in 2005:

"Your average ten year old can instruct you in oral and anal sex"


 

speedie87

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 5, 2012
  • #10
So hope this isn't true. Have always loved his match reports he could even make out games sound exciting.
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 5, 2012
  • #11
speedie87 said:
So hope this isn't true. Have always loved his match reports he could even make out games sound exciting.
Click to expand...

One of my favourirtes was from a Villa game he was commentating on in 1990.

"Ian Ormondroyd, like the late great Douglas Bader, great in the air, not so clever on the ground"
 
M

Macca

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 6, 2012
  • #12
Welcome to "Its a Knockoneout"
 

cloughie

Well-Known Member
  • Dec 6, 2012
  • #13
nothing to worry about he's bringing in max clifford to clear his name
 

Flying Fokker

Well-Known Member
  • May 2, 2013
  • #14
Pleaded guilty to charges. 1 case of rape put on file. Opportunistic predator.
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • May 2, 2013
  • #15
Terrible news
 

skybluejelly

Well-Known Member
  • May 2, 2013
  • #16
deanocity3 said:
Rolf Harris surely not.....
God yes he had 2 little boys
Click to expand...

christ deano...anyone else you want to out a year in advance
 

Flying Fokker

Well-Known Member
  • May 3, 2013
  • #17
With RH it is more likely to be as a result of his over familiarity with adult women.
 
S

SkyblueBazza

Well-Known Member
  • May 3, 2013
  • #18
Lets open a book on who's next :-o
 

dutchman

Well-Known Member
  • May 3, 2013
  • #19
Flying Fokker said:
Pleaded guilty to charges. 1 case of rape put on file.
Click to expand...

"Alleged rape", his accuser declined to give evidence in court.
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • May 3, 2013
  • #20
When you consider that the legal system from Police to lawyers to Judges was and probably is still heavily male orientated ,coupled with a touch of incompitence and Discouragement ,its a wonder any complainant has the guts to sit in court and tell it as they feel it.
 

blueflint

Well-Known Member
  • May 4, 2013
  • #21
hall starr dlt roach harris prison panto gonna be good this year
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jun 17, 2013
  • #22
Sentencing today, I wonder if he will get out of going to prison because of his age etc etc.
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 17, 2013
  • #23
PREDATOR Stuart Hall has been jailed for just 15 months for sexually assaulting more than a dozen young girls — one was just nine years old.

The shamed former It's a Knockout host, 83, sat grim faced in the dock as he was sentenced to the equivalent of just 32 DAYS in prison for each of his 14 assaults.
He is likely to serve half his sentence or less behind bars before being freed on licence.
The veteran BBC broadcaster could have been jailed for up to five years for his catalogue of crimes.
He groped 13 girls over two decades of preying on vulnerable youngsters aged nine to 17.

Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepag...etta-against-famous-people.html#ixzz2WTmzR7Y5
​
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jun 17, 2013
  • #24
Awful. Should have spent the last of days there.

Does that mean somebody who is 30 and non famous can expect 32 days in jail for the same crime? Very much doubt it.
 

LastGarrison

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 17, 2013
  • #25
Hopefully he dies in jail.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 17, 2013
  • #26
I wonder if one of the inmates will punch him on the jaw and shout ' It's a Knockout!'
 

dutchman

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2013
  • #27
At the other extreme Jim Davidson remains on bail despite never having been charged with any offence and never having been questioned in relation to any offence!
 
H

Hugh Jarse

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2013
  • #28
They only gave him 7 and a half months but the twat played his joker!:jerkit:
 

Colonel Mustard

New Member
  • Jun 19, 2013
  • #29
Nick said:
Does that mean somebody who is 30 and non famous can expect 32 days in jail for the same crime? Very much doubt it.
Click to expand...

Not comparable cases. Hall's crimes occurred over 25 years ago when laws were less defined. He was also treated more leniently because in 1986, in front of a probation officer, he resolved to stop his behaviour, cease drinking and be celibate, and has kept his record clean since then.

There will be a lot of political headlining over this, so it is worth reading the full judgement: http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resourc...s/stuart-hall-sentencing-remarks-17062013.pdf
 

deanocity3

New Member
  • Jun 19, 2013
  • #30
no wonder eddie waring kept saying up and under
 
H

henry the wasp

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2013
  • #31
Colonel Mustard said:
Not comparable cases. Hall's crimes occurred over 25 years ago when laws were less defined. He was also treated more leniently because in 1986, in front of a probation officer, he resolved to stop his behaviour, cease drinking and be celibate, and has kept his record clean since then.

There will be a lot of political headlining over this, so it is worth reading the full judgement: http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/Resourc...s/stuart-hall-sentencing-remarks-17062013.pdf
Click to expand...

I think you've read that wrong. He did'nt tell a probation officer in 1986 about stopping his behaviour. He told the probation officer this year during the gathering of pre sentencing reports. His solicitor would of told him to say this as no more incidents had come to light since then.
if i have read it wrong then what was he seeing a probation officer for in 86?
 

Colonel Mustard

New Member
  • Jun 19, 2013
  • #32
henry the wasp said:
I think you've read that wrong. He did'nt tell a probation officer in 1986 about stopping his behaviour. He told the probation officer this year during the gathering of pre sentencing reports. His solicitor would of told him to say this as no more incidents had come to light since then.
if i have read it wrong then what was he seeing a probation officer for in 86?
Click to expand...

True. You're right, crossed wires. Nevertheless, the historical element is what played heavily into the lenient sentence. Not comparable with a 30 year old man guilty of recent crimes under modern legislation.
 
H

henry the wasp

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2013
  • #33
Colonel Mustard said:
True. You're right, crossed wires. Nevertheless, the historical element is what played heavily into the lenient sentence. Not comparable with a 30 year old man guilty of recent crimes under modern legislation.
Click to expand...

I was'nt arguing that point.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jun 21, 2013
  • #34
That fella got 5 or so years today, although it still isn't right what he did at least it was consensual so why the difference in sentencing? I understand it was a while ago but even so, does that mean if somebody murdered somebody in 1901 and for some reason were still alive they would be hung?
 

Blue Maniac

Member
  • Jun 21, 2013
  • #35
Nick said:
That fella got 5 or so years today, although it still isn't right what he did at least it was consensual so why the difference in sentencing? I understand it was a while ago but even so, does that mean if somebody murdered somebody in 1901 and for some reason were still alive they would be hung?
Click to expand...
I'm not following your logic.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 7 (members: 0, guests: 7)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?