Proof of funds to do what?
Proof of funds to do what?So long as he doesn't ask for proof of funds with traceability all the way through like SISU want with anyone interested in CCFC.
He has added more questions than he has answered though.That's the thing isn't it, they are obviously working together on it as one night fisher says that Sharpe will confirm it and the next day he has.
Think you can read it either way you want. If it was a non-starter it would be a short statement saying Fisher is full of BS and there's no chance of it happening. What he actually says is that a groundshare with CCFC is one of the options under consideration but there are, quite rightly, conditions from CRFC's side to ensure they don't get screwed over.
At this stage I wouldn't get too hung up on the 12K. Sharp has commented before about an initial capacity in that region but able to rise should CCFC rise up the leagues. From what he said then it was a case off building one stand at a time so at a guess you'd start with a 3 sided ground like Bournemouth then add in the 4th side and finally replace the existing stand.
Exactly, set up a joint venture prop co owned by Otium and CRFC. He's not dealing with SISU then.
Same for me I have been to DoncasterFor me.
I'd love this to happen, but I wouldn't be happy with it if it was only 12000.
Maybe they could recoup any money spent with the proceeds of wedding functions and pie money1, Does he count Fisher as CCFC or SISU? To me most probably CCFC or he wouldn't have bothered talking to CCC about it or release a statement saying happy to work with CCFC at this present moment.
2, How would it be paid for without input from SISU?
3, Why would SISU invest in any form into something that they would never own?
4, 12,000 max? Blows Fishers bullshit out of the water about extending up to 25,000.
To me it is a great location for us as supporters for a stadium. But I can't think of anything else good about it. And that statement tells us all we need to know. Either Fisher is bullshitting about the size of any stadium or Fisher is bullshitting about wanting a stadium there and having to pay for it when they won't own it.
2 again. What difference does it make to me? Was that an attempt at a joke?1. Clearly he seperates them as can be seen
2. What difference does it make to you. He is not got to tell you is he? Did he consult you when he bought the headlease?
3. It says no dealings with SISU so that is out
4. 12000 max is their preferred in the absence of any other requirement
Fisher simply said there are investors for the stadium - he did not say who
not if CRFC have 51% of the prop coTo be a joint venture prop co would mean giving up ( in some way ) their control of BPA - but he says" CRL would retain control and ownership of the site"
So that is out from that
Who says & WTF does that actually mean?He is dealing with CCFC though !!
Who says & WTF does that actually mean?
I doubt Sharp is an idiot so if one of the options under consideration is CCFC playing there he will be aware of the pitch requirements.o we just need SISU to leave abdcto convince him that a grass pitch is required and we will pay to relay it 3 times a year?
sub lease at a guess.And what would the prop co own?
2 again. What difference does it make to me? Was that an attempt at a joke?
You asked teh question
If he won't allow any input from SISU he certainly wouldn't allow them to invest in his stadium.
sub lease at a guess.
I doubt Sharp is an idiot so if one of the options under consideration is CCFC playing there he will be aware of the pitch requirements.
SISU don't need to leave for them not to be involved at least technically. The precise way he's phrased it, several times now, makes me think it is deliberate.
so remind me who has charge over all of the Otium Entertainment Group assets present and future?. Who controls ARVO? Who "back stops" the finances at CCFC? What finance has Otium Entertainment Group itself got to contribute to a capital scheme? Who controls Otium Entertainment Group Limited? Who has an employee on the Board of directors? Who authorises the directors to sign off on the major contracts like leases
Then tell me which company owns the trade marks of CCFC? Who is listed as having the EFL share? Who pays the players wages? Which company receives all the football income and pays the football liabilities?
But it is possible to deal with CCFC and not SISU in any way ....... yes of course it is
Why would anyone invest in a stadium they won't own?1. Clearly he seperates them as can be seen
2. What difference does it make to you. He is not got to tell you is he? Did he consult you when he bought the headlease?
3. It says no dealings with SISU so that is out
4. 12000 max is their preferred in the absence of any other requirement
Fisher simply said there are investors for the stadium - he did not say who
Why would anyone invest in a stadium they won't own?
No change there then.12k would be enough for 5 years i bet. they probably waiting to see what happens with wasps and ricoh.
i have no idea what i am on about to be fair
Tim Fisher said that?Timmy's bluff has been called.
"Also, as I have already stated elsewhere, we will not deal with SISU"
I wouldn't either........
So what level can we play at with an artificial pitch?
not if CRFC have 51% of the prop co
As far as i'm aware the rule for artificial pitches is they are ok for FA cup and up to conference level not aboveHe is far far from an idiot. He us the exact opposite I would say.
So what level can we play at with an artificial pitch?
Surely all part of the mediation / negotiation call it what you must. The fact that SISU have agreed to be involved must be taken as far as it can go?
What harm can it do after all this time?
You don't need to, that's not what he's said. He's selected his language very precisely. As long as he and CRFC only deal with the club he's not dealing with SISU even if they are pulling the strings in the background.just exactly how do you keep SISU influencing or agreeing or making decisions for CCFC?
You don't think he's an idiot but you think he's spending time evaluating a groundshare with CCFC while insisting on a playing surface we couldn't use?He is far far from an idiot. He us the exact opposite I would say.
So what level can we play at with an artificial pitch?
Depends on the figures surely. 50% of £5 is better than 100% of £1.How would CRFC agree to letting someone else have revenue that clearly they could keep for themselves?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?