Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Squad Numbers (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter fernandopartridge
  • Start date Jul 25, 2017
Forums New posts

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #1
The club have announced the squad numbers for next season. Do we read anything into Stevenson's outlying squad number?

NEWS: 2017/18 squad numbers announced!

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 
R

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #2
fernandopartridge said:
The club have announced the squad numbers for next season. Do we read anything into Stevenson's outlying squad number?

NEWS: 2017/18 squad numbers announced!

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

It's the same as his squad number from last season, so I would say no, interesting that Reid and Turnbull have numbers tho.
 

Seb

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #3
No George Thomas listed, must definitely be off to leicester then.
 

Hadji's_Goatee

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #4
5 gaps in the numbers - is that 5 more perm signings to come in or 5 loans to fill?
 

Seb

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #5
RoboCCFC90 said:
It's the same as his squad number from last season, so I would say no, interesting that Reid and Turnbull have numbers tho.
Click to expand...
Its like Haynes, hes kept 24 so maybe they just like that number and robins has let them keep them
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #6
RoboCCFC90 said:
It's the same as his squad number from last season, so I would say no, interesting that Reid and Turnbull have numbers tho.
Click to expand...
Aye, suppose. Might not want to mess up his Instagram handle either

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: Astute and oucho

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #7
Number 9 as well!

Also interesting Jones has gone from JJ10 to JJ11.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #8
Sayoud is a strange one, is he actually a real life player as he doesn't seem to be anywhere near yet.
 

MatthewWallis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #9
RoboCCFC90 said:
It's the same as his squad number from last season, so I would say no, interesting that Reid and Turnbull have numbers tho.
Click to expand...

But they've both gone to quite high numbers. I'd expect both of them to be gone or not feature much at all
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #10
Reid and Turnbull being shunted from starting 11 numbers to high 20s and up is suggestive. Stuart Beavon's name has a full stop at the end, that's doing my head in.
 
Reactions: torchomatic, Skyblueweeman and Polar

Cavan O'Doherty

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #11
Hopefully the filling of the number 9 doesn't mean no more strikers. 12 has probably been reserved for Moorhouse? Wonder which number Pearson will wear if he signs.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #12
ajsccfc said:
Reid and Turnbull being shunted from starting 11 numbers to high 20s and up is suggestive. Stuart Beavon's name has a full stop at the end, that's doing my head in.
Click to expand...

Ha was just about to point that out, what's that code for?
 

bawtryneal

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #13
Cavan O'Doherty said:
Hopefully the filling of the number 9 doesn't mean no more strikers. 12 has probably been reserved for Moorhouse? Wonder which number Pearson will wear if he signs.
Click to expand...
69
 
Reactions: Adge, fernandopartridge, ccfc_Tom and 1 other person

oucho

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #14
Also interesting to see Burge as #1 - I had felt that O'Brien would be first choice (not that squad numbers mean as much as they used to - RCC was number 1 for most of TM's time whilst Burge still had #1 as his understudy)
 
L

Lord_Nampil

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #15
Telegraph got it wrong again?? Seems they started at 1 and ran out of numbers rather than missing the few out in the middle!!
 
S

skybluesam66

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #16
and why are 15% of our squad called Jordan
is it because we usually play like a load of tits
 
Reactions: Adge, Earlsdon-Loyal-Blue, Earlsdon_Skyblue1 and 1 other person

BigadamL

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #17
Turnbull and Reid suggests that if they stay they can be part of MR plans, or is it because they are under contract unlike Thomas?
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #18
BigadamL said:
Turnbull and Reid suggests that if they stay they can be part of MR plans, or is it because they are under contract unlike Thomas?
Click to expand...

Yeah, it will be because contractually they are still with us. Thomas isn't.
 
Reactions: BigadamL

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #19
 
Reactions: torchomatic and Skyblueweeman

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #20
Reckon we could line-up 1-11 on the opening day which must be a rare occurrence these days in football?

Burge

Grimmer
Willis
McDonald
Stokes

Doyle
Kelly

Vincenti
McNulty
Jones

Biamou
 
Reactions: torchomatic, skybluepm2 and fernandopartridge
R

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #21
Seb said:
No George Thomas listed, must definitely be off to leicester then.
Click to expand...

He wouldn't be included in our squad listing as he isn't under contract.
 
Reactions: JimmyHillsbeard

steve82

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #22
The no9 shirt is a big one for me, suggests he's very happy with Biamou and don't have a more experienced striker in line currently on his target list.

I'm not saying no more strikers will arrive tho. I do hope we get a natural proven target man tho with Moorhouse too.
That will give us a full compliment of striking options
 
R

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #23
MatthewWallis said:
But they've both gone to quite high numbers. I'd expect both of them to be gone or not feature much at all
Click to expand...

Turnbull has 6 days and counting to seal a move under his own powers or then it becomes an opportunity for CCFC to require a fee for him.

If Turnbull doesn't leave I can see him being apart of the squad, same with Reid.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #24
RoboCCFC90 said:
Turnbull has 6 days and counting to seal a move under his own powers or then it becomes an opportunity for CCFC to require a fee for him.

If Turnbull doesn't leave I can see him being apart of the squad, same with Reid.
Click to expand...

It's been quiet about him having talks, haven't seen the usual rumours of other fans either saying he is in talks with them.
 

ccfctommy

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #25
Play in 1 to 11 now we are in the tinpot leagues!
 

chiefdave

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #26
Wouldn't read too much into the squad numbers. Don't think this generation of players are really bothered about 1-11.
 
R

RoboCCFC90

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #27
Nick said:
It's been quiet about him having talks, haven't seen the usual rumours of other fans either saying he is in talks with them.
Click to expand...

It's been very quiet, I would imagine that if anything is to be done it will be closer to the 31 July.
 

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #28
Does kind of suggest there are 5 gaps he'd still like to fill.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #29
SlowerThanPlatt said:
Reckon we could line-up 1-11 on the opening day which must be a rare occurrence these days in football?

Burge

Grimmer
Willis
McDonald
Stokes

Doyle
Kelly

Vincenti
McNulty
Jones

Biamou
Click to expand...
Thought that myself, like it as well. Squad Numbers are another pointless Americanism with purely commercial objectives

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #30
ccfctommy said:
Play in 1 to 11 now we are in the tinpot leagues!
Click to expand...
Nothing tinpot about it

Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
 

Gazolba

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #31
Moorhouse did not get a number. He looks very useful, I hope we sign him.
 

Adge

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #32
The stuff of nightmares when you see No 1 L Burge!:nailbiting:
 
Reactions: I_Saw_Shaw_Score

MatthewWallis

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 25, 2017
  • #33
Gazolba said:
Moorhouse did not get a number. He looks very useful, I hope we sign him.
Click to expand...

Yeah shame that. We didn't give Messi a number either
 
Reactions: I_Saw_Shaw_Score

no_loyalty

Well-Known Member
  • Jul 26, 2017
  • #34
I wonder what number Baker will be given?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?