shmmeee
Well-Known Member
People like you need a carer who manages your internet access. Any thicker and you’d set.
notice you are so quick to believe he is 17, why is that ? because the BBC told you so, you really are brainwashed.
The police have said sonotice you are so quick to believe he is 17, why is that ? because the BBC told you so, you really are brainwashed.
I asked you, quite sincerely and have now checked myself, as to where this notion the guy is in his 30's has been reported.notice you are so quick to believe he is 17, why is that ? because the BBC told you so, you really are brainwashed.
Although it has widely been reported this scum is 17, doesn't mean he is, on certain other media sites saying more like in his 30s
no picture release why, to protect him or to cover up,
you could also blame the media for these protests what are happening because of there false and inaccurate information they are spouting.
and they wonder why the public are angry, yes the public, not the far right as the media would have you believe, just goes to show how out of touch with reality these in government are.
how can the families even begin to have closure with no release of picture, tell you why that is, he is not 17..
You're fucking thick, mate. An utter fool.Although it has widely been reported this scum is 17, doesn't mean he is, on certain other media sites saying more like in his 30s
no picture release why, to protect him or to cover up,
you could also blame the media for these protests what are happening because of there false and inaccurate information they are spouting.
and they wonder why the public are angry, yes the public, not the far right as the media would have you believe, just goes to show how out of touch with reality these in government are.
how can the families even begin to have closure with no release of picture, tell you why that is, he is not 17..
LOL, the irony in calling someone brainwashed. How old are you? If your answer is anything older than 12 then I don't believe you.notice you are so quick to believe he is 17, why is that ? because the BBC told you so, you really are brainwashed.
There's a lot of pensioners who don't need it though. It needs streamlining.
I actually know a few pensioners and all but one said they don't need it.
We have to help the ones really struggling.
It's like Clint said in his post. This lot have a list. When something is disproved on their list they cross it off and move onto the next conspiracy theory. Sylus is the kind of fucking idiot that hangs on to every word from Robinson, Farage, Fox, Tate, etc.I asked you, quite sincerely and have now checked myself, as to where this notion the guy is in his 30's has been reported.
I genuinely would like to know, because I can find nothing.
And on the other point, that of it being a conspiracy and the BBC hiding the truth and being biased .....if so, then, why, why, why would they report that the parents of the attacker are Rwandan?
It makes no sense. In saying they are Rwandan, doesn't that fuel some up even more in the notion that it was a migrant that did it?
Racist and dangerous too.You're fucking thick, mate. An utter fool.
Seems fine on here. Join SBT and discuss your team selection for Saturday and spread racist conspiracy theories. All welcome.Conspiracy shit to incite anger is fair game eh?
The likes of stylus and GIMOC are why people have gathered to riot, and this thread is as culpable for that as any.Seems fine on here. Join SBT and discuss your team selection for Saturday and spread racist conspiracy theories. All welcome.
It's not the way it should have gone for sure, but I can't say I am surprised.Racist and dangerous too.
This thread is an embarrassment.
I'm ashamed to be part of this board. It's a disgrace.It's not the way it should have gone for sure, but I can't say I am surprised.
TrueThe likes of stylus and GIMOC are why people have gathered to riot, and this thread is as culpable for that as any.
Shame on them, it, and us for allowing it to stand.
Ain't what it used to be.I'm ashamed to be part of this board. It's a disgrace.
Same people who said he was a muslim who came on a small boat last yearI feel we may well be getting close to the earth is flat and the Democrats eat babies territory.
Would love to know who is saying he's in his 30's.
He read it on Facebook no doubtWhat?
Why would they say he is 17, if he's in his 30's?
Which certain media sites?
Only a couple of days ago, he was a migrant that only arrived here on a boat a year ago and was already on the MI5 watchlist.
Where are you getting your info from?
Yes. Why is our moderator allowing it?I'm ashamed to be part of this board. It's a disgrace.
I can only assume Boosh is trolling when they claim to be banned, because otherwise chatting shit about reality TV, calling people losers and making up football rumours is worse!Yes. Why is our moderator allowing it?
Oh. He's convinced me then. .He read it on Facebook no doubt
Yes. Why is our moderator allowing it?
He will be soon!He is clearly 17 but I do think he should be named
You reckon all out racism, falsehoods and conspiracy theory nonsense is?Suppression of debate and opinion is not the correct approach
I agree.He is clearly 17 but I do think he should be named
You reckon all out racism, falsehoods and conspiracy theory nonsense is?
What has actually happened however it's it's emboldened some to think they're right, and encouraged the impressionable to take on some of those views.If its directed personally at individuals then no
If its generalised the views are still there if you see them or not and then there is an opportunity to debate it,
I have always said the BNP were bought down as they were allowed a voice and with a voice comes scrutiny.
The marginalisation of people with different views creates more problems not reducing them
I agree.
As has been said, some people will know exactly who he is anyway. They would know him.
I think he should be named
So tricky these days, because things have clearly changed with the onset of social media.If its directed personally at individuals then no
If its generalised the views are still there if you see them or not and then there is an opportunity to debate it,
I have always said the BNP were bought down as they were allowed a voice and with a voice comes scrutiny.
The marginalisation of people with different views creates more problems not reducing them
What has actually happened however it's it's emboldened some to think they're right, and encouraged the impressionable to take on some of those views.
There's a difference between a different view and dangerous falsehoods and lies.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?