This is what ML apparently told the CT two weeks ago:
He said: “We are about three weeks away from being able to name the final site. We are down to two sites and hopefully, within a month, two will be down to one."
Looks like a categoric and unambiguous statement you would think? Well, ML now says it wasn't correct as this is what he told the SBT on 16 January about the statement.
"Another distorted conversation. CET rang up to ask about recent interviews. Journalist asked where the new site was. I was then misquoted"
And I thought TF was the master of mis-information and contradiction!
Been made perfectly clear 'the site will be revealed when the i's are dotted & the t's crossed'.
Far too many parties involved and these situations are always drawn-out and protracted, unfortunately.
However, things are progressing all be it just a little slowly as usual with all property & land deals.
You better beleive it!
Been made perfectly clear 'the site will be revealed when the i's are dotted & the t's crossed'.
Far too many parties involved and these situations are always drawn-out and protracted, unfortunately.
However, things are progressing all be it just a little slowly as usual with all property & land deals.
You better beleive it!
Been made perfectly clear 'the site will be revealed when the i's are dotted & the t's crossed'.
Far too many parties involved and these situations are always drawn-out and protracted, unfortunately.
However, things are progressing all be it just a little slowly as usual with all property & land deals.
You better beleive it!
Been made perfectly clear 'the site will be revealed when the i's are dotted & the t's crossed'.
Far too many parties involved and these situations are always drawn-out and protracted, unfortunately.
However, things are progressing all be it just a little slowly as usual with all property & land deals.
You better beleive it!
Been made perfectly clear 'the site will be revealed when the i's are dotted & the t's crossed'.
Far too many parties involved and these situations are always drawn-out and protracted, unfortunately.
However, things are progressing all be it just a little slowly as usual with all property & land deals.
You better beleive it!
Indeed. In other news I hear they've taken the word 'gullible' out of the OED.
Look at all of the available evidence, RFC. This isn't a project that's slipping, this is a project that hasn't even started.
They'll be no dotting of i's or crossing of t's until there's an end to the j's and r's I'm afraid
... and probably not even then.
ML now says it wasn't correct as this is what he told the SBT on 16 January about the statement.
"Another distorted conversation. CET rang up to ask about recent interviews. Journalist asked where the new site was. I was then misquoted"
And I thought TF was the master of mis-information and contradiction!
I'd just like to say, I'm extremely comfortable with the fact I quoted Mr Labovitch accurately and I have the shorthand note to prove it.
One shouldn't go throwing around accusations like that willy-nilly. IMO.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Been made perfectly clear 'the site will be revealed when the i's are dotted & the t's crossed'.
Far too many parties involved and these situations are always drawn-out and protracted, unfortunately.
However, things are progressing all be it just a little slowly as usual with all property & land deals.
You better beleive it!
I'd just like to say, I'm extremely comfortable with the fact I quoted Mr Labovitch accurately and I have the shorthand note to prove it.
One shouldn't go throwing around accusations like that willy-nilly. IMO.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Guy's,why don't you all just block him like i have?
He's obviously a crank. Spare yourselves the aggro.
I'd just like to say, I'm extremely comfortable with the fact I quoted Mr Labovitch accurately and I have the shorthand note to prove it.
One shouldn't go throwing around accusations like that willy-nilly. IMO.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I'd just like to say, I'm extremely comfortable with the fact I quoted Mr Labovitch accurately and I have the shorthand note to prove it.
One shouldn't go throwing around accusations like that willy-nilly. IMO.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why don't you put the shorthand interview on here? Might be interesting to see him squirming about trying to back his claim of being misquoted.
Been made perfectly clear 'the site will be revealed when the i's are dotted & the t's crossed'.
Far too many parties involved and these situations are always drawn-out and protracted, unfortunately.
However, things are progressing all be it just a little slowly as usual with all property & land deals.
You better beleive it!
I'd just like to say, I'm extremely comfortable with the fact I quoted Mr Labovitch accurately and I have the shorthand note to prove it.
One shouldn't go throwing around accusations like that willy-nilly. IMO.
Block him. You have to be joking. His utterances are comedy gold.Guy's,why don't you all just block him like i have?
He's obviously a crank. Spare yourselves the aggro.
Block him. You have to be joking. His utterances are comedy gold.
Everyone going off at RFC I don't understand the point.. He has a view just like everyone else.
Thank you Simon for sharing that information I think everyone had pretty much assumed that could of been the case.
Hitler had a view also and I didn't care for that much either...
I call Godwins Law. Thread should be closed.
I call Godwins Law. Thread should be closed.
I think you're just generally lost in life
No but if it's not in Coventry I don't see how it can use the name and keep the history. Do you?
It's strange that very few (on here) thought new players would be brought in, they have and as I've previously said if we don't return to the Ricoh (and it's looking less & less likely) a new stadium will be built.
Otherwise the Sky Blues will have nowhere to play, is that what the majority of you want?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?