Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

So Slade says he is going to make changes for Bury (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Otis
  • Start date Feb 25, 2017
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
I

its a buzzard

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 26, 2017
  • #36
stevefloyd said:
Ghadzev shit... Rose shit... Lameiras Shit... Reid shit... 2 goalkeepers shit... Tudgay shit...Haynes at full back shit....
Not great is it.... who do we vote for as player of the season.... shit what a pathetic bunch of individuals our management teams have amassn ed now I am going for a shit
Click to expand...
Having just returned from the throne room, I can recommend it. That euphoric, light-headed feeling is hard to beat and leaves you believing you can deal with anything thrown your way. Perhaps our manager and players are constipated, and a different sort of clear-out is needed?
 
R

rupert_bear

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 26, 2017
  • #37
Make changes ? as I see it unless Stevenson, Stokes, Willis and possibly Harres are ready as a group to come in who else is there? Slade has a certain way he pays will he change ? doubt it somehow
 

Bugsy

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 26, 2017
  • #38
stevefloyd said:
Ghadzev shit... Rose shit... Lameiras Shit... Reid shit... 2 goalkeepers shit... Tudgay shit...Haynes at full back shit....
Not great is it.... who do we vote for as player of the season.... shit what a pathetic bunch of individuals our management teams have amassed now I am going for a shit
Click to expand...


I think the only worthy one is G.Thomas
....PUSB
 

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 26, 2017
  • #39
Gazolba said:
Everyone who is saying drop Tudgay, you know he's our leading scorer right?
Ghadzhev should be in, he's a Bulgarian international.
Click to expand...

Thomas is now with 5, unless you're counting league only
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 26, 2017
  • #40
SlowerThanPlatt said:
Thomas is now with 5, unless you're counting league only
Click to expand...
Willis also has 5

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 26, 2017
  • #41
Sordell had 7?

Wish we still had him.
 

steve82

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 26, 2017
  • #42
covcity4life said:
Sordell had 7?

Wish we still had him.
Click to expand...

Only had 4 in the league tho in 20 games, still don't think he'd of been the answers to our problems. We will never know.
 
C

covboy1987

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 26, 2017
  • #43
Otis said:
What do we reckon they will be?

RCC for Burge for starters I would say personally, but I don't think Slade will do that unfortunately.

I would assume Willis back and Beavon in and maybe Vernam too.

Please no Reid or Lameiras and it's about time Andy Rose was dropped too.

It's a game we've got to win. Yeah, yeah, I know, most likely too late anyway, but we have to set out to try.

Foley just in front of the back four may have worked last week, but it certainly didn't this time and our midfield were overrun at times.

Drop Tudgay, drop Rose, put Willis in and Move Turnbull to left back. If Haynes is to play at all it needs to be further up the pitch.

Wonder how far off a return Ben Stevenson is.
Click to expand...

Doesn't matter what changes he makes we are down and the way things are going down and maybe 20 points adrift at the final count - Slade obviously does not look at the league table and see that we need goals and attacking players- so he leaves both wingers on the bench and brings on a guy Yakubu that plainly is not fit enough to be involved in a game- nobody was supplying the forwards earlier so how by bringing Yakubu would it make any difference? he brings Reid on in the last few minutes and we score straight away
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 26, 2017
  • #44
The only change he needs to make is staying at home during the game. And preferably the whole week before too.
 
Reactions: The Reverend Skyblue and covcity4life

sw88

Chief Commentator!
  • Feb 26, 2017
  • #45
PVA said:
Turnbull was our best player today, either him or G.Thomas, he definitely doesn't deserve to be dropped.

The midfield is really poor, surely Bigi or Ghadzev can offer more than Foley.
Click to expand...

He wasn't the worst but was at fault for the first goal. Did make two noticeable challenges to stop Ajose getting at least another two mind.

However whilst I was all for keeping the defence settled yesterday, it didn't work. Turnball + Willis in a back two doesn't work. Both too inexperienced. Rawson could possibly play instead of Willis but think Turnball needs an experienced head alongside him which rules out dropping Clarke, who probably had his worst game for us himself yesterday.

As for Vlad, I want it to work out for him. It just doesn't look like it's gonna.
 

hill83

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 26, 2017
  • #46
TURNBULL
 
Reactions: wingy

BigadamL

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 26, 2017
  • #47
Yesterday Burge was poor!
DKE our best RD option
clarke was his worst game- but keep
turnbull- tried to play football yesterday but can't! - drop FOREVER!!!
Haynes did ok until his knock then went quiet - keep
foley- pointless- thinks his a fucking crab. Drop forever
riley- hard working - keep
rose this formation is not for him
Thomas x 2 feel sorry playing in this shit side
tudguy I feel sorry for him works hard for the team but because he doesn't score he gets slated
 

Adge

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 26, 2017
  • #48
stevefloyd said:
Ghadzev shit... Rose shit... Lameiras Shit... Reid shit... 2 goalkeepers shit... Tudgay shit...Haynes at full back shit....
Not great is it.... who do we vote for as player of the season.... shit what a pathetic bunch of individuals our management teams have amassed now I am going for a shit
Click to expand...
Was your shit shit?
 

Adge

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 26, 2017
  • #49
sw88 said:
He wasn't the worst but was at fault for the first goal. Did make two noticeable challenges to stop Ajose getting at least another two mind.

However whilst I was all for keeping the defence settled yesterday, it didn't work. Turnball + Willis in a back two doesn't work. Both too inexperienced. Rawson could possibly play instead of Willis but think Turnball needs an experienced head alongside him which rules out dropping Clarke, who probably had his worst game for us himself yesterday.

As for Vlad, I want it to work out for him. It just doesn't look like it's gonna.
Click to expand...
2nd goal abysmal aswell. Ajose behind Haynes who stood like a statue to let him in front and plant it in the onion bag. What the hell were Clarke, Turnbull and Burge doing for the 3 rd?
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 26, 2017
  • #50
Adge said:
2nd goal abysmal aswell. Ajose behind Haynes who stood like a statue to let him in front and plant it in the onion bag. What the hell were Clarke, Turnbull and Burge doing for the 3 rd?
Click to expand...
Passing the buck.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 26, 2017
  • #51
sw88 said:
He wasn't the worst but was at fault for the first goal. Did make two noticeable challenges to stop Ajose getting at least another two mind.

However whilst I was all for keeping the defence settled yesterday, it didn't work. Turnball + Willis in a back two doesn't work. Both too inexperienced. Rawson could possibly play instead of Willis but think Turnball needs an experienced head alongside him which rules out dropping Clarke, who probably had his worst game for us himself yesterday.

As for Vlad, I want it to work out for him. It just doesn't look like it's gonna.
Click to expand...
Turnbull and Willis have got a couple of hundred appearances between them at this level. If Clarke is a measure of experience then I'd rather have rookies playing.
 

sw88

Chief Commentator!
  • Feb 26, 2017
  • #52
fernandopartridge said:
Turnbull and Willis have got a couple of hundred appearances between them at this level. If Clarke is a measure of experience then I'd rather have rookies playing.
Click to expand...

Maybe so but they haven't exactly had he best record playing alongside each other? If anything Turnball looked like a duff signing from day 1 when playing alongside Willis. He has however improved alongside Clarke so he must be doing something right?
 

steve82

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 26, 2017
  • #53
fernandopartridge said:
Turnbull and Willis have got a couple of hundred appearances between them at this level. If Clarke is a measure of experience then I'd rather have rookies playing.
Click to expand...

sw88 said:
Maybe so but they haven't exactly had he best record playing alongside each other? If anything Turnball looked like a duff signing from day 1 when playing alongside Willis. He has however improved alongside Clarke so he must be doing something right?
Click to expand...

Clarke and Willis would be my preferred partnership, clarke had a very bad game yesterday but other than that been steady at the back. Turnbull blows hot one week cold the next. Baring them 2 quality last minute tackles yesterday he had a shocking game all round.
He is typical of the comments RS says about players performing consistently week in week out
 
Reactions: sw88

Gint11

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 27, 2017
  • #54
Willis might be back!!! Bury players shaking in their boots. Fuck sake. Spend the day in the city centre and you'll find better players!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: Adge
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?