Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Sky sports news (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Steve.B50
  • Start date Aug 27, 2012
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last
R

Real

New Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #106
valiant15 said:
Real,what league have this shower of shit dumped us in?
Click to expand...

The old division 3. Who knows where we would be without them, if we were to still exist even.
 
V

valiant15

New Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #107
Omg,wake up man.
 

Sky Blues

Active Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #108
Ricoh2012 said:
Right - SISU are not buying part of the Ricoh, they want too but the council will block them. The only reason they bought the club on the cheap was to get their hands on the Ricoh as its a goldmine.

To buy the Higgs Shares you must own the club, this was a clause in the Higgs buying out the club shares - this then protects the club from being kicked out of the arena by someone that just wants the stadium.

What people don't relise is that none of the profits made by the Ricoh goes to the shareholders until the mortgage that ACL took out to help build the place is paid off - even if SISU bought half 2moro they still wouldn't get any of the revenue generated!!!
Click to expand...

Some of us do realise the last point as OSB has been making it for some time. Fisher this morning was talking about getting hold of some of the match day revenues "to put on the pitch". I have some difficulty squaring that with the Higgs negotiations because as I understand it that would not provide the revenues. There must be a third stream of negotiations taking place (1 being rent, 2 being buying Higgs trust shares in ACL & 3 being match day revenues). I think there is a lot going on behind the scenes that we're not hearing about.
 
Last edited: Aug 27, 2012

@richh87

Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #109
Real said:
The old division 3. Who knows where we would be without them, if we were to still exist even.
Click to expand...

Name a club anywhere near our size that has ever gone out of existence. Get real.
 
V

valiant15

New Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #110
A lot of bullying probably.
 
V

valiant15

New Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #111
It's amazing isnt it rich,some people think its sisu forever. So if sisu walked away writing their losses off effectively making us debt free,nobody would be willing to take the club over? It's laughable.
 
R

RichieGunns

New Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #112
valiant15 said:
Omg,wake up man.
Click to expand...

Was that aimed at me or Real??
 
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #113
Sky Blues said:
Some of us do realise the last point as OSB has been making it for some time. Fisher this morning was talking about getting hold of some of the match day revenues "to put on the pitch". I have some difficulty squaring that with the Higgs negotiations because as I understand it that would not provide the revenues. There must be a third stream of negotiations taking place (1 being rent, 2 being buying Higgs trust shares in ACL & 3 being match day revenues). I think there is a lot going on behind the scenes that we're not hearing about.
Click to expand...

Think TF was alluding to the turnover aspect of being able to include aspects of ACL turnover into Club accounts thus being able to spend more through the increase in the 65%
 

Paxman II

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #114
Someone suggesting above that revenue streams will not help CCFC if they buy into ACL as it would all be going to the mortgage first? That's just silly.

If my business had such a restriction that my mortgage needed to be paid in full before I could use various revenue streams I think I'd find another banker!
 

@richh87

Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #115
valiant15 said:
It's amazing isnt it rich,some people think its sisu forever. So if sisu walked away writing their losses off effectively making us debt free,nobody would be willing to take the club over? It's laughable.
Click to expand...

It really is laughable! We are a big club and if SISU pissed off then so would the £30mil debt they claim we owe.
 

Sky Blues

Active Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #116
wingy said:
Think TF was alluding to the turnover aspect of being able to include aspects of ACL turnover into Club accounts thus being able to spend more through the increase in the 65%
Click to expand...

Ah, "fudging it". Yes, creative accounting is always good for the long term health of an organisation...
 
R

RichieGunns

New Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #117
@richh87 said:
It really is laughable! We are a big club and if SISU pissed off then so would the £30mil debt they claim we owe.
Click to expand...

The debt we owe to them that they owe to themselves...now thats laughable lol
 

Disorganised1

New Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #118
Bumped into Joe Elliott in Man At C&A where he was trying on a new Sky Blue suit. He told me that the team have been practising a contoversial new corner routine that they didn't want filmed. Allegedly they are going to kick the ball to the back of the penalty area where one of our players will head it back into the centre. The intention is that this will allow attackers to lose their markers and so score when the ball comes back in.

There is also talk of leaving one up when we are defending a corner.
 

Sky Blues

Active Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #119
Paxman II said:
Someone suggesting above that revenue streams will not help CCFC if they buy into ACL as it would all be going to the mortgage first? That's just silly.

If my business had such a restriction that my mortgage needed to be paid in full before I could use various revenue streams I think I'd find another banker!
Click to expand...

I've not been able to find it yet, but you need to read the explanation of how this works. I think OSB posted it. I'll keep looking for it.
 
V

valiant15

New Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #120
Not at you richie.
 
R

RichieGunns

New Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #121
valiant15 said:
Not at you richie.
Click to expand...

Cool

That corner technique sounds interesting. I can see how it would work. Ball goes sailing over the box, the opporsition turn to deal with the threat, maybe think they can get to it and clear it off the line only to realise the balls just been nodded back in and their markers are now free to do what they will with it.

Also very glad that they're now looking at keeping a man up front at corners. Much more sensible. With the amount of tall players we have we shouldn't need all our players back for corners anymore.
 

Sky Blues

Active Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #122
OK, I'm sure there was a fuller explanation somewhere, but this was from PWKH, of the Higgs charity: "ACL is not the Council or the Charity. It is owned by them, yes. The Directors appointed by the Charity and the Council have to act in the best interest of the Company, equally in the interest of both shareholders. Neither the Council nor the Charity get any payments of any kind from the Company and won't until the mortgage is paid off. This at the current rate is likely to be in 15 years time."

I'm sure someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think he is saying it is ACL rules, not the bankers that require the mortgage to be paid off before any payments an be made to shareholders. I don't think SISU buying out the Higgs stake would give them the leverage to change the company's rules.
 
T

Tonylinc

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #123
Sky Blues said:
OK, I'm sure there was a fuller explanation somewhere, but this was from PWKH, of the Higgs charity: "ACL is not the Council or the Charity. It is owned by them, yes. The Directors appointed by the Charity and the Council have to act in the best interest of the Company, equally in the interest of both shareholders. Neither the Council nor the Charity get any payments of any kind from the Company and won't until the mortgage is paid off. This at the current rate is likely to be in 15 years time."

I'm sure someone can correct me if I'm wrong, but I think he is saying it is ACL rules, not the bankers that require the mortgage to be paid off before any payments an be made to shareholders. I don't think SISU buying out the Higgs stake would give them the leverage to change the company's rules.
Click to expand...
That sounds about right UNLESS we are talking really big money here and for that they must have found other investors.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #124
@richh87 said:
Name a club anywhere near our size that has ever gone out of existence. Get real.
Click to expand...

As we are speaking Pompey are not safe.
 

Sky Blues

Active Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #125
Astute said:
As we are speaking Pompey are not safe.
Click to expand...

And didn't Rangers go out of existence? (but maybe they're not the same size as us as they have a bigger supporter base...)
 
Last edited: Aug 27, 2012

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #126
Sky Blues said:
And didn't Rangers go out of existence? (but maybe there not the same size as us as they have a bigger supporter base...)
Click to expand...

Said same size. Rangers were much bigger than us
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #127
Wimbledon werent a small club?
 

WillieStanley

New Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #128
http://www.skysports.com/video/inline/0,,16487_8024447,00.html

Whole lot of fuss about nothing!!
 

@richh87

Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #129
Astute said:
As we are speaking Pompey are not safe.
Click to expand...

Yeah - name one our size. They're smaller
 
R

RichieGunns

New Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #130
Nick said:
Wimbledon werent a small club?
Click to expand...

But that was intentional as far as i remember.

They wanted to build a new stadium in Wimbledon but weren't allowed to do so for some reason or another and MK didn't have a team at the time so they decided to move to MK and that meant changing their name...
 

skybluebeduff

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #131
:facepalm: :facepalm: waited all day for a 59sec video :facepalm: :facepalm: :jerkit:
 

@richh87

Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #132
Seriously people - Portsmouth are a smaller club who had money thrown at them. By the same token Wigan aren't bigger.

Also - no club anywhere near our size in English football has EVER been liquidated.
 

Disorganised1

New Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #133
@richh87 said:
Seriously people - Portsmouth are a smaller club who had money thrown at them. By the same token Wigan aren't bigger.

Also - no club anywhere near our size in English football has EVER been liquidated.
Click to expand...

Another first for CCFC ?
 

Colonel Mustard

New Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #134
@richh87 said:
Seriously people - Portsmouth are a smaller club who had money thrown at them. By the same token Wigan aren't bigger.

Also - no club anywhere near our size in English football has EVER been liquidated.
Click to expand...

Football's house of cards has been trembling for some time now. Where once teams could go into administration and get a clean slate, we're now seeing the likes of Rangers being pushed to the brink. It won't be long before a 'big' club is wound up. It is really not something to be flippant about.
 

@richh87

Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #135
Colonel Mustard said:
Football's house of cards has been trembling for some time now. Where once teams could go into administration and get a clean slate, we're now seeing the likes of Rangers being pushed to the brink. It won't be long before a 'big' club is wound up. It is really not something to be flippant about.
Click to expand...

I'm not having people thank SISU for our current situation - that's ridiculous.
 

Colonel Mustard

New Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #136
@richh87 said:
I'm not having people thank SISU for our current situation - that's ridiculous.
Click to expand...

How did you get that from what I wrote?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #137
Rangers were big. Pompey have crowds bigger than us this season. We are not as big as some think. We may be safe at the moment, but things are moving quicker than before.
 

Sky Blues

Active Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #138
@richh87 said:
Seriously people - Portsmouth are a smaller club who had money thrown at them. By the same token Wigan aren't bigger.

Also - no club anywhere near our size in English football has EVER been liquidated.
Click to expand...

We give you Rangers (a bigger club), you redefine the boundaries... Don't believe it can't happen. It can. If the iceberg is big enough, the ship can sink.
 

@richh87

Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #139
Colonel Mustard said:
How did you get that from what I wrote?
Click to expand...

That's how this discussion started a few pages back. That Sick Boy mong.
 

@richh87

Member
  • Aug 27, 2012
  • #140
Astute said:
Rangers were big. Pompey have crowds bigger than us this season. We are not as big as some think. We may be safe at the moment, but things are moving quicker than before.
Click to expand...

We only owe money to SISU.

To liquidate us would be to write the money they're 'owed' off. Unlikely.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Next
First Prev 4 of 5 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?