mark82
Super Moderator
Exactly Don. They are just doing it out of spite in my opinion. Can understand saying won't sign a deal if that is their line but doesn't stop talks. Showing their true colours.
Then maybe this is the time for the CET and the trust to put a little pressure on ACL.
Why in earth not have the talks, but say to SISU if we agree a deal it will not be signed off, unless those two conditions are met.
It ridiculous that the fans may miss out on our club for another year due to mindless stubbornness.
Simon. Should be calling ACL out on this now. No reason for them not to talk. If it's not one side being idiots it's the other.
Also, they have had the general public support until now and they risk losing it. Maybe they thought people cared more about them than the club. Although there has been a lot of name calling on here any sensible person knows that every single one of us here support ccfc over anything.
Plenty on here will hope ACL "stand their ground" even if it means sixfields for another 3 years.
Plenty on here will hope ACL "stand their ground" even if it means sixfields for another 3 years.
Sisu want to do a deal. It's well known now. Like SP days both sides have to compromise else it won't work.
Mid season rule is shit. It shouldn't be allowed. You either start there or nothing. It doesn't make sense. You declare your ground for the years fixtures and that's it. Another bollocks rule
Do they really want to do a deal though?
It looks to me they are just trying to appease the fans by putting forward a proposal that they know ACL won't accept at this time.
Do they really want to do a deal though?
It looks to me they are just trying to appease the fans by putting forward a proposal that they know ACL won't accept at this time.
A proposal to return to the Ricoh was placed on the CCFC website and signed off by both Seppala & Fisher.
The same statement was then published in the CET except this time only Fisher's name appeared. Now we all know
from passed deals that Fisher shook hands on, Seppals is just going to throw them out.
When Seppala contacts ACL and requests talk's on returning to the Ricoh we can assume there is some truth in
the current rumour. Then and only then should our hopes rise that a return may be on the cards.
Standing their ground? They only want 1. the money Otium agreed with the FL to pay and 2, SISU do themselves a favour and drop their time and money wasting JR. Not asking for much really. You are just blindly following the party line. ( I agree though, that it wouldn't be a major problem for ACL to turn a blind eye to the money as the Fl will make them pay all of it anyway ).
Plenty on here will hope ACL "stand their ground" even if it means sixfields for another 3 years.
Hilarious that some are still claiming it's ACL that are "standing their ground". ACL's "ground" was £1.3m rent and no revenue. Then it was £400k and you can buy some revenue.
I'll keep asking until I gt an answer: What ground have Sisu given since day 1 of this? How have their demands changed at all from the day they left the Ricoh?
We need to drop the whole who is right and who is wrong thing. We all know Sisu are twats. We need to be putting pressure on the 2 sides to talk and at the moment it is ACL stopping that happening.
We need to drop the whole who is right and who is wrong thing. We all know Sisu are twats. We need to be putting pressure on the 2 sides to talk and at the moment it is ACL stopping that happening.
Nothing like a good conspiracy theory.
Exactly which part of my post constitutes a conspiracy. It is exactly what happened and the last paragraph is the only way
ACL would consider talks.
Who is in the wrong in that case though. ACL are the ones point blank refusing to talk.
We need to drop the whole who is right and who is wrong thing. We all know Sisu are twats. We need to be putting pressure on the 2 sides to talk and at the moment it is ACL stopping that happening.
Didn't Simon say it was a human error?
We need to drop the whole who is right and who is wrong thing. We all know Sisu are twats. We need to be putting pressure on the 2 sides to talk and at the moment it is ACL stopping that happening.
Didn't Simon say it was a human error?
I thought it was mere high court judges that are wrong (in law and in fact), Timmy is always 100% perfect isn't he?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?