Samo
Well-Known Member
How am I doing that?
Because recent revelations have nothing to do with the JR.
Shame your putting your hatred of the council ahead of what's good for the club isn't it?
How am I doing that?
but why are they bothering....its not like that they will get wasps deal over turned and they get it instead ffs......
I know. It's amazing what you can achieve if you approach negotiations from the right angle.
Tell me how I've defended CCC?
@TheSimonGilbert: BREAKING: Sisu statement following rejection of appeal permission: "Sisu has confirmed the process and will now apply for an oral hearing."
Sisu winning wont do the club any good now. Wasps have the Ricoh and that is that. Best get used to it.
Was it ever going to benefit the club?
People best get used to us being a L1 club as well at bestSisu winning wont do the club any good now. Wasps have the Ricoh and that is that. Best get used to it.
Not technically true. They did get some revenue.
Also I never knew that renting something meant you got ownership of it after an unspecified amount of time.
When do expect Gallagher Developments to hand over the deeds to the club shop?
In light of recent revelations, including today's, why the fuck wouldn't they? I hope they win and I hope heads roll at the council house.
But it wasn't state aid was it? That has been proven.
Sisu winning wont do the club any good now. Wasps have the Ricoh and that is that. Best get used to it.
It doesn't mean that.... the point is that the club were bent over a barrel by CCC and most of you still do your absolute best to defend them to the hilt.
Sorry to have to repeat myself but
It is all a bit to hard for some to work out or what , ACL as an ongoing business was in profit until / except for legal fees concerned with constant court cases being thrown at them by those who were trying to distress ACL business.
Is that simple enough ?
But no worries sisu can continue battering people in court
It wasn't state aid when being made to a company protecting it's own investment.
That is no longer the case, as you saaid yoursself, it would be state aid if maade to an entirely private company.
That is what has happened now.
But you're hero Anne has admitted that the Ricoh was not profitable without CCFC, legals or not, is that simple enough for you?
But at the point the loan was made ACL was very profitable, and its then that matters. What happened after January 2013 is irrelevant.
But at the point the loan was made ACL was very profitable, and its then that matters. What happened after January 2013 is irrelevant.
You mean like Northampton Councils loan to Northampton Town FC for their ground extension?
Weren't acl without ccfc when the loan was made?But at the point the loan was made ACL was very profitable, and its then that matters. What happened after January 2013 is irrelevant.
The club should have gone into administration in 2003. Instead they ran to the council begging for the deal that followed, all the while whipping up the local media and fans into pressuring the council to accept the deal. If anyone was bent over a barrel it was CCC.
CCC were wrong to bow to public pressure, they should have kept out of it and let CCFC go under.
Please stop making up lies about what I have said.
I would also stop making allegations that have proven to be false in court if I were you.
Seek an oral hearingSISU refused permission to appeal, but are going to appeal?
SISU refused permission to appeal, but are going to appeal?
Absolute bollocks and you know it. Why are you so intent on defending these cretins. No other council in the country would be willing to fuck over the local football team like these shady fuckers have. Most councils see their football teams as an asset to their towns or cities, shame Coventry City council don't see ours that way.
Quotes from you.
http://www.skybluestalk.co.uk/threa...or-The-Accountants?highlight=acl+loan+illegal
Post 37.
See you in court?
From what I can make out they've been had the first application, which is made in writing, turned down. They can now go and make an application in person, basically argue their case.
Weren't acl without ccfc when the loan was made?
yep, if only they had built us a stadium and given us half of the management company for a mere £6m.
Is the oral one automatic now or direcessionary?From what I can make out they've been had the first application, which is made in writing, turned down. They can now go and make an application in person, basically argue their case.
Unfortunately I really think sisu are getting ready to liquidate and wind us up. The continual cutbacks and no playing staff or the bare minimum with minimum contracts are all clear signs the end is coming.
Sisu wouldn't be here still unless there was a purpose to it. They obviously still have ccfc and im sure they can offload debts or use ccfc as a tax offset (I'm no tax man) I'm just guessing something can be used for ccfc and when all avenues are exhausted then ccfc is set up to end.
Why appeal the appeal? Oral hearing now? I mean it's obvious it won't work and there won't be a second JR. why keep lying about the new stadium? The answer to the above questions is because it keeps the gullible believing until it time to pull the plug.
But you're hero Anne has admitted that the Ricoh was not profitable without CCFC, legals or not, is that simple enough for you?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?