no it won't, ACL have already said (completely reasonably) that they won't discuss until the JR is dropped,
The football league will decide. If they decide £300,000 I assume you, like me, will demand talks once that amount has been paid?
Off course. I assume you hope they get the full amount so no remnants of barrier is left and we don't find ourselves in another ridiculous situation as fans where we have to make demands on anyone when all we should be doing is concentrating on on-field events like normal football fans.
Who gives a shit what they get, could be a fiver and a dry hand job for all I care.
Unlike you I don't care about the size of ACL's bank balance, so if the football league decide its £59 or £590000 I couldn't give a toss. If ACL don't start discussions after the decided amount has been paid then they're bigger c**ts than I thought they were.
If a fiver and a dry hand job aren't enough for ACL to open the door for negotiations on a return you don't give a shit? Interesting. How's that going to help the club come home?
I'm assuming you do want the club to come home?
so, discussions with someone who is taking them to court ?
Unlike you I don't care about the size of ACL's bank balance, so if the football league decide its £59 or £590000 I couldn't give a toss. If ACL don't start discussions after the decided amount has been paid then they're bigger c**ts than I thought they were.
Why can't that be a part of the discussions, I expect both sides will have certain demands.
so, discussions with someone who is taking them to court ?
What a bullshit argument, surely ACL can still discuss an agreement with SISU. Surely part of any discussion would include both sides demands. Sometimes I do wonder if some people want us to come home. I think SBT will die a death when this is all sorted.
Easiest way to stop them taking you to court.
Seems to be cutting off your nose to spite your face to not talk to someone and potentially avoid resolution.
I don't care either about ACL's bank account. But I also don't want barriers in a return to the Ricoh and the only way to ensure that this barrier is down is for ACL to get paid in full. It's that simple.
Unlike you I don't care about the size of ACL's bank balance, so if the football league decide its £59 or £590000 I couldn't give a toss. If ACL don't start discussions after the decided amount has been paid then they're bigger c**ts than I thought they were.
It will be interesting to the see the reaction if the FL decide on a figure less than the 590K, and ACL then continue to refuse to discuss a return to the Ricoh.
Were SISU still taking them to court when they tendered that offer through the FL back In November or had they been knocked back at that point ?
I think they were still taking them to court at that point.
I don't care either about ACL's bank account. But I also don't want barriers in a return to the Ricoh and the only way to ensure that this barrier is down is for ACL to get paid in full. It's that simple.
That's what I thought yet the tendered that offer .
So if ACL said they would need 10 billion dollars as the barriers wouldn't come down?
I agree courst cases should be dropped and money owed should be paid, but no reason they can't all stop being dicks and at least meet and talk about it and have conditions and terms before things can progress rather than both hiding behind waiting for the FL to make up their mind.
I am not saying anything should be signed, but they can at least talk about it and then both discuss the things that need to happen before the wheels start turning.
Have ACL said that? No, so stop being stupid. Who came to the £590k figure? Not ACL. Were ACL demanding any amount of money before the FL came to the figure that they did?
They should be able to meet and get things agreed but that clearly wasn't going to happen while the FL are burying their heads in the sand. Hence the we have a proposal ready statement from JS & TF and then just TF. There's no way that statement would have been made if ACL said that the doors open regardless. Hence Joys name came of it as it gives them the opportunity for handshake gate the replay.
So if ACL said they would need 10 billion dollars as the barriers wouldn't come down?
I agree courst cases should be dropped and money owed should be paid, but no reason they can't all stop being dicks and at least meet and talk about it and have conditions and terms before things can progress rather than both hiding behind waiting for the FL to make up their mind.
I am not saying anything should be signed, but they can at least talk about it and then both discuss the things that need to happen before the wheels start turning.
So if ACL said they would need 10 billion dollars as the barriers wouldn't come down?
I agree courst cases should be dropped and money owed should be paid, but no reason they can't all stop being dicks and at least meet and talk about it and have conditions and terms before things can progress rather than both hiding behind waiting for the FL to make up their mind.
I am not saying anything should be signed, but they can at least talk about it and then both discuss the things that need to happen before the wheels start turning.
At the minute both sides are just hiding behind the FL, who are themselves hiding away.
So why can't they meet and talk while they wait for the FL? I am sure if the FL say that £1 or £590k is owed and paid then that side of it is sorted so it is just the court cases to be dropped.
There is nothing stopping them meeting and talking. If ACL had said "Let's meet and discuss, these are going to be the stumbling blocks going forward that would need to be resolved before going anywhere but we can at least talk about it" then it would have really called bluffs wouldn't it?
At the minute both sides are just hiding behind the FL, who are themselves hiding away.
It is ironic that it was Appleton that come to this £590k figure, and if the FL decide that £590k isn't due, it will support ACL's original argument that the CVA was flawed and Appleton didn't investigate the situation properly.
Had the guarantours paid then? Surely that is what the issue is?
Had the guarantours paid then? Surely that is what the issue is?
Serious question. How are the guarantors connected to Otium or whatever Otium recieved in return for the payment that the FL ssaid they had to make?
It is ironic that it was Appleton that come to this £590k figure, and if the FL decide that £590k isn't due, it will support ACL's original argument that the CVA was flawed and Appleton didn't investigate the situation properly.
If the FL derived the £590,000 from the administration process...Serious question. How are the guarantors connected to Otium or whatever Otium recieved in return for the payment that the FL ssaid they had to make?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?