skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
No lie. You're definitely to dumb to work it out for yourself.
So you lied - fair enough
Most likely.
Surely it would be more far-fetched to believe there weren'tYou believe there are people working for SISU (and maybe even CCC) on here?
Surely it would be more far-fetched to believe there weren't
Surely it would be more far-fetched to believe there weren't
In this day and age they wouldn't be doing their jobs if they weren't keeping an eyeExactly. From all sides.
Especially when one let slip details from an SCG meeting not that long ago before they were published. In fact they pretty much quoted something that TF said word for word from the published minutes before they went up on the clubs site the very next day. And before grendull starts no it wasn't someone from the trust.
I think they would be the type who watch a lot, but post little just popping up now and thenMaybe so. There are a few on both sides who are a little OTT.
I think they would be the type who watch a lot, but post little just popping up now and then
On the more political threads, I think Rfc could be undercover for the Special Branch.
He's definitely special that one.
Awwww come on Grendel woo knows woo made a ickle bickle bowwock don't wooWhat has that to do with anything? Despite the widely held view on here fisher is not stupid. He and waggott would have looked at other clubs who've moved and realised the impact that would have on support.
Every game at a 70 mile round trip would decimate attendances. The exact reference was classic fisher "they will come" it's a throw away gallery remark that would have had no impact when budget planning.
But he says if the team doesn't perform it'll be 3000 so they budgeted
For the worst case scenario.
Yeah but these are the 'really "Special Branch"Special Branch wouldn't stand out like a sore thumb, so that rules RFC out.
I know that, but we're talking about what they budgeted for.The team entertained and it was worse than the worse case scenario
I know that, but we're talking about what they budgeted for.
I think they got a shock a budgeted fir far more fans
No lie. You're definitely to dumb to work it out for yourself.
Exactly. From all sides.
Especially when one let slip details from an SCG meeting not that long ago before they were published. In fact they pretty much quoted something that TF said word for word from the published minutes before they went up on the clubs site the very next day. And before grendull starts no it wasn't someone from the trust.
Who was it anyone? Not Tony as he seems reluctant to name names.
Who was it anyone? Not Tony as he seems reluctant to name names.
Someone else actually picked up on it (not that you would have noticed with your head stuck up your arse like it is) at the time it was posted. The other poster not being a member of the SCG although probably close enough to someone who is that they can get a sneaky peak at the SCG notes. I only picked up on what they were pointing out the next day when the official minutes went up on the clubs site, the penny dropped so I went back and double checked what was originally posted and sure enough it was pretty much word for word to a comment attributed to TF in the SCG note's.
Jan wasn't it?Who was it anyone? Not Tony as he seems reluctant to name names.
Try doing some research Grenduffy, instead of making the snide "Link" remarks.Who was it anyone? Not Tony as he seems reluctant to name names.
Try doing some research Grenduffy, instead of making the snide "Link" remarks.
Only because I couldn't find it.Didn't you want someone to find the Tim Fisher video for you yesterday? Just sayin'.
Looking for any type of intelligence some days would be an impossible task. Plenty of idiots though :cyclops:Anyone from organisation putting any effort whatsoever into counter intelligence on Sky Blues Talk is an idiot.
Anyone from organisation putting any effort whatsoever into counter intelligence on Sky Blues Talk is an idiot.
No it's F&B he says they received £72.000 for F&B and £3000 parking, goes on to
Say it's 15% but would get 100% at the butts on our match day.
Is it £150.000 p/a rent ? Because if it is you would have to say that's a cracking deal.
So what are those OSB because it looks like SCMP is currently 40%of turnover?Not quite right is it. Currently they get the net profit split 50:50 which equates to 15% of the turnover. For which they bear no costs at all
Then next breath it is a HR or in New stadium we got 100's of thousands....... yes but you got 100's of thousands of costs too.
Got to compare like with like.
Oh and SCMP is based on net after deduction of direct costs
That seems a very low profit margin for this type of thing, even before you consider the prices at the Ricoh are higher than anywhere else.Currently they get the net profit split 50:50 which equates to 15% of the turnover.
To me it looks like we'd have to grow a further £3M of turnover to grow Player budget anywhere close to 60%,so another 20,000 on the gates and a £1M sponsorship deal, or build a ground £25M with a ceiling of of up to 20k fill it every week get said sponsorship and sell gazillion pies every match, then pay for it?It may be CD but the point is the comparison fisher keeps repeating is misdirection at its finest
Compass needs to have its (franchise ) loans repaid out of it!That seems a very low profit margin for this type of thing, even before you consider the prices at the Ricoh are higher than anywhere else.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?