Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Sisu -do the decent thing and go!! (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Sky Blue Pete
  • Start date Mar 2, 2013
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3

cloughie

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 2, 2013
  • #71
According to some we will be the only club not to be rescued from admin and no one interested in buying a football club

some people need to get in the real world

but some have a vision for the future but not a torch
 
C

Chipfat

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 2, 2013
  • #72
I may be delusional or just full of wishful thinking, but i can't see the council playing hard ball as they are if they didn't have something more going on than anyone knows, regarding another interested party. They have all of a sudden become very confident about dealing with Sisu, to the point where its sign or get out, for them to do this it's pretty strong wording. We all agree the ground needs the club and we know ACL understand this, so might be someone is in waiting, in football there always is, so now the ball is firmly in Sisu's court and maybe's Monday's meeting will shed some light.
 
Last edited: Mar 3, 2013
S

SkyBlueWomble

New Member
  • Mar 2, 2013
  • #73
Tonylinc said:
How many more times must it be said......Sisu's only interest in CCFC is the stadium and surrounding areas. They will not be happy with anything short of that. Having got it they will be off in a flash and to hell with CCFC. Coventry City Council are well aware of this and as a result will not negotiate with them.
Click to expand...

I am always quite curious in this theory that SISU are only interested in the stadium and surrounding area so they can quickly sell it on. Ignoring the obvious that commercial land & property is generally in recession outside of the South East, I don't know why any party interested in acquiring the stadium and surrounding land wouldn't deal with the Council now rather than wait for it to fall into SISU's hands first and incur SISU's mark up...
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 2, 2013
  • #74
That's it in a nutshell my friend I think
 
R

RichieGunns

New Member
  • Mar 2, 2013
  • #75
tippex9 said:
Hand the club over to the council????? Lol

I'm out!!!!
Click to expand...

Well no one else is lining up to take over are they?

ACL and the Council do not wish to deal with SISU (other than to get their rent money) and the Council has catagorically stated they will not hand over half shares of the ricoh to SISU.

SISU are a lost cause. The only way we can move on as a club (in any capacity) is for SISU to leave.

Whoever takes over will have a clean slate (As far as the council is concerned) and should have an easier time discussing options on buying the stadium etc.

And I doubt SISU will be allowed to walk away from the rent issue.

I believe whoever takes over will be exempt from paying the rent arears.

ACL will go after SISU for the whole lot if I'm not mistaken.

Of course I might be wrong on that last point!

It's just a feeling I have...
 
Last edited: Mar 2, 2013

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 2, 2013
  • #76
My conversations today with CCC man would suggest there would be interested parties but no dealings with sisu just the administrator
 
S

SkyBlueWomble

New Member
  • Mar 2, 2013
  • #77
ACL don't have any contractual relationship with SISU therefore they cannot go after them. SISU owe ACL and the council sweet FA on a contractual basis. ACL only have a contract with CCFC and the CCFC companies have substantial net liabilities so ACL could make moves to wind up the club companies but it wouldn't get them very far financially at least.
 

coundonskyblue

New Member
  • Mar 2, 2013
  • #78
ACL have proven themselves to be pretty astute business people. Therefore you have to ask why these astute business people are so reluctant to do business with Sisu. They clearly do not see them as the right people to take our club forward.
 
R

RichieGunns

New Member
  • Mar 2, 2013
  • #79
Chipfat said:
I may be delusional or just full of wishful thinking, but i can't see the council playing hard ball as they are if they didn't have something more going on than anyone knows regarding another interested party. They have all of a sudden become very confident about dealing with Sisu to the point where its sign or get out, for them to do this is pretty strong wording. We all agree the ground needs the club and we know ACL understand this so might be someone in waiting, as in football there always is ball is firmly in Sisu's court.
Click to expand...

Well as I see it, your pretty much hitting the nail on the head there Chipfat!

We all know SISU specialise in buying companies who are stuck in debt but have large potential for profit. They pay off said debt and then work towards making the company viable. They then sell it on.

When they buy a company and it backfires, instead of jumping ship, they work the angles, trying to find any way they can of getting their investment to work or at least getting back the money they initially spent on the company.

If we go with this idea, it becomes clear why they've stuck with CCFC for so long. They started to make a loss right from the start. They tried to renegotiate the deal for the rent after the first 4 months of owning CCFC.

That obviously didn't work did it or we wouldn't be having these problems. It could mean that ACL and the Council didn't trust them even then! Since they've taken over, they tried everything they can to make CCFC a viable concern.

It's not worked. They've had offers from interested parties (Hoffman) but have refused because the offer they received wasn't to their liking. We know Hoffman offered them one shiney pound and the promise of taking all the debts over.

What SISU wanted (and still do) is their initial investment back, even though the club isn't worth that anymore. Then you look at their attempts to bankrupt ACL, another attempt to make some easy money and now even thats backfired.

If it had worked, i reckon they would have tried to purchase ACL themselves, therefore absorbing the company in their holdings and pretty much taking the half share in the ricoh for themselves.

If what you say is true Chipfat, then the Council have worked out SISU's plans and have frustrated them at every turn. Now they have a noose around SISU's neck and they'll continue to tighten it until SISU give in and hand the club over to them.

Then the buyers you mentioned can swoop in and take over for that mythical golden pound lol It would mean a 10 point deduction next season and possibly having to sell or let go of most of our players but it would offer us a chance to begin again!

Whether that's a good thing remains to be seen.
 
Last edited: Mar 3, 2013

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2013
  • #80
Good or not its the only thing Richie
 
R

RichieGunns

New Member
  • Mar 3, 2013
  • #81
Sky Blue Pete said:
Good or not its the only thing Richie
Click to expand...

Don't get me wrong Pete, I agree with you.

I already suggested the Council/ACL as one of our only viable takeover options.

I would like to know who these investors are (as I'm sure would most Sky Blue Fans) and it's intriguing that no one wants to work with SISU.

They must not have very good business credentials and after this CCFC fiasco, their image is probably completely tarnished (if it wasn't before!)

So I don't blame these supposed investors (or the Council) for not wanting to deal with Shitsu!

Part of me wishes they'd get it over with. This whole situation is like a story of a soap opera!

I just want it to end now cause it's that tortuous! Shame someone can't just go and murder Joy and bury her under a congrete floor...

It worked when they killed Dirty Den in Eastenders
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2013
  • #82
Apologies...again, I've not had the time to read 9 pages. Sorry about that.

I agree entirely with the sentiment of your post. It would be great if they did one and we had new owners who simply threw millions into the first team so we could get promotion to the Championship and then to the Premier League. I want that more than anyone...even as a supporter from afar, I really do. And I'm totally on board with your thoughts.

However....how many individuals/parties/groups/conglomerates (?) etc are queuing up to buy us right now? NONE. Whilst we're in this situation, which is partly SISUs fault (As well as ACLs, Cov City Councils, Richardsons, McGinnitys, Keys, Hoffmans, Mine for not going as much as maybe I could've etc etc), there's no alternative.

Until an Ambromovic/Skiek Mansoor type follows Godivas hoof-steps into the city, we're 'stuck' with our current owners. I am (and always will be) thankful that we didn't go into adminstration and thank SISU for that. I have however relaxed my stance in the past 24 months as they've made mistakes and they're the reason why we are where we are.

That said, they've admitted they've made mistakes and its been known that under the new FFP rules, changes must be made. Regardless of what you think, SISU are more qualified to make decisions on this and make us viable and rule-worthy, than you or I.

I also wish for new owners. But until someone with a stupid amount of money and no common sense comes into town, we have SISU who continue to play player wages, police costs etc. Without them as it stands, the hardcore would be shopping with their other halves on a Saturday.

WM
 
D

dadgad

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2013
  • #83
RichieGunns said:
Well as I see it, your pretty much hitting the nail on the head there Chipfat!

We all know SISU specialise in buying companies who are stuck in debt but have large potential for profit. They pay off said debt and then work towards making the company viable. They then sell it on.

When they buy a company and it backfires, instead of jumping ship, they work the angles, trying to find any way they can of getting their investment to work or at least getting back the money they initially spent on the company.

If we go with this idea, it becomes clear why they've stuck with CCFC for so long. They started to make a loss right from the start. They tried to renegotiate the deal for the rent after the first 4 months of owning CCFC.

That obviously didn't work did it or we wouldn't be having these problems. It could mean that ACL and the Council didn't trust them even then! Since they've taken over, they tried everything they can to make CCFC a viable concern.

It's not worked. They've had offers from interested parties (Hoffman) but have refused because the offer they received wasn't to their liking. We know Hoffman offered them one shiney pound and the promise of taking all the debts over.

What SISU wanted (and still do) is their initial investment back, even though the club isn't worth that anymore. Then you look at their attempts to bankrupt ACL, another attempt to make some easy money and now even thats backfired.

If it had worked, i reckon they would have tried to purchase ACL themselves, therefore absorbing the company in their holdings and pretty much taking the half share in the ricoh for themselves.

If what you say is true Chipfat, then the Council have worked out SISU's plans and have frustrated them at every turn. Now they have a noose around SISU's neck and they'll continue to tighten it until SISU give in and hand the club over to them.

Then the buyers you mentioned can swoop in and take over for that mythical golden pound lol It would mean a 10 point deduction next season and possibly having to sell or let go of most of our players but it would offer us a chance to begin again!

Whether that's a good thing remains to be seen.
Click to expand...


Pretty much my take on it too. Difficult to see where else sisu can go.
Bet they wish they'd baled out to GH now.......they've been awful for the club and city....only an idiot could think otherwise.
 

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2013
  • #84
dadgad said:
Pretty much my take on it too. Difficult to see where else sisu can go.
Bet they wish they'd baled out to GH now.......they've been awful for the club and city....only an idiot could think otherwise.
Click to expand...

GH who proved he had millions (or investors millions) to save his 'beloved' CCFC?

WM
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2013
  • #85
Grendel said:
Pathetic.,,..
Click to expand...

Agree they are.

Look at their aims and objectives and how far they are away from them.

No other business would survive such a calamitous period of performance.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2013
  • #86
LoyalSupporters said:
Their not going to go, another pointless thread.
Click to expand...

The problem is they are suggesting it. So you can hardly blame people for discussing it.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2013
  • #87
tippex9 said:
For the club to compete inside Fair Play rules they considered this offer still pointless. Without seeing the figures and projections, neither of us can decide was a fair offer.

Mutton & Co are trying to hold on to a revenue stream that his slowly killing the club. SISU leaving will not change that.
Click to expand...

They will deal with someone if they trust them.
 
D

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2013
  • #88
Chipfat said:
Big meeting with Sisu lawyers on Monday as per TF comment, lets hope the decision is made in regards to what they plan to do with CCFC. As no matter who u believe this situation cannot carry on and funding it may be an even harder sell to lawyers who see no return on company money.
Click to expand...

Nothing to worry about. Remember we can trust Tim


But the City chief is adamant Coventry, FA Cup winners in 1987, will not go to the wall and says they will play elsewhere before that happens.

"I’ll tell you one thing, the club comes first, we are committed to fulfil our fixtures," he said.

"This isn’t about liquidation, this isn’t about the club going out of existence, we need to be absolutely crystal about that.



Read More http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/coventry-city-fc/coventry-city-fc-news/2012/12/06/coventry-city-rejected-excellent-deal-on-ricoh-arena-rent-say-stadium-managers-acl-92746-32375782/#ixzz2MRGX5jMl
 

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2013
  • #89
dongonzalos said:
They will deal with someone if they trust them.
Click to expand...

Yep I think that's where it is at!! And no end of posturing from Mr fisher will change acl or ccc opinion now I don't think. To be fair given time and a number of decisions and actions sisu could regain some trust but i am not sure how! Makes me more and more sick to the stomach that fans were forced to give up shares back when they took over. Oh well we all live and learn!!
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2013
  • #90
Oh, big statement. "Investors interested". Who? And where have you heard that's the case?

Sky Blue Pete said:
Someone else Grendel. Investors interested
Click to expand...
 
M

Macca

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2013
  • #91
Skyblueweeman said:
Apologies...again, I've not had the time to read 9 pages. Sorry about that.

I agree entirely with the sentiment of your post. It would be great if they did one and we had new owners who simply threw millions into the first team so we could get promotion to the Championship and then to the Premier League. I want that more than anyone...even as a supporter from afar, I really do. And I'm totally on board with your thoughts.

However....how many individuals/parties/groups/conglomerates (?) etc are queuing up to buy us right now? NONE. Whilst we're in this situation, which is partly SISUs fault (As well as ACLs, Cov City Councils, Richardsons, McGinnitys, Keys, Hoffmans, Mine for not going as much as maybe I could've etc etc), there's no alternative.

Until an Ambromovic/Skiek Mansoor type follows Godivas hoof-steps into the city, we're 'stuck' with our current owners. I am (and always will be) thankful that we didn't go into adminstration and thank SISU for that. I have however relaxed my stance in the past 24 months as they've made mistakes and they're the reason why we are where we are.

That said, they've admitted they've made mistakes and its been known that under the new FFP rules, changes must be made. Regardless of what you think, SISU are more qualified to make decisions on this and make us viable and rule-worthy, than you or I.

I also wish for new owners. But until someone with a stupid amount of money and no common sense comes into town, we have SISU who continue to play player wages, police costs etc. Without them as it stands, the hardcore would be shopping with their other halves on a Saturday.

WM
Click to expand...

Ha, the only people that would be out shopping would be those who wouldn't watch us if we were non league like Grendel
 

skybluegnome

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2013
  • #92
torchomatic said:
Comforting for fans of CCFC. The Council are supporters of the club apparently.
Click to expand...

If my memory serves me well didn't the Tory side of CCC vote against the planning application to build the Arena.....supporters when it suits them it seems...just like the extra 20K who turned up a couple of weeks ago...
 

skybluegnome

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2013
  • #93
Chipfat said:
I may be delusional or just full of wishful thinking, but i can't see the council playing hard ball as they are if they didn't have something more going on than anyone knows, regarding another interested party. They have all of a sudden become very confident about dealing with Sisu, to the point where its sign or get out, for them to do this it's pretty strong wording. We all agree the ground needs the club and we know ACL understand this, so might be someone is in waiting, in football there always is, so now the ball is firmly in Sisu's court and maybe's Monday's meeting will shed some light.
Click to expand...

Hoffman was at the game yesterday lol...
 

ashbyjan

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2013
  • #94
Politicians fickle? Football fans fickle? Blimey you learn a lot coming on here on a Sunday morning
 

coundonskyblue

New Member
  • Mar 3, 2013
  • #95
skybluegnome said:
If my memory serves me well didn't the Tory side of CCC vote against the planning application to build the Arena.....supporters when it suits them it seems...just like the extra 20K who turned up a couple of weeks ago...
Click to expand...

Incorrect, they voted against the Club selling its shares of ACL to the Higgs Trust. They wanted to postpone the Ricoh project until the club got its finances in order.
 

skybluegnome

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2013
  • #96
coundonskyblue said:
Incorrect, they voted against the Club selling its shares of ACL to the Higgs Trust. They wanted to postpone the Ricoh project until the club got its finances in order.
Click to expand...

Then I stand corrected....
 
D

dadgad

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2013
  • #97
Macca said:
Ha, the only people that would be out shopping would be those who wouldn't watch us if we were non league like Grendel
Click to expand...

This is probably the best reason of all.

Get rid of Sisu AND their sycophants:claping hands:
 

Mr T - Sukka!

Active Member
  • Mar 3, 2013
  • #98
If you had invested £45 Million pounds would you just walk away from it?

Or would you try to stick it out? It seems SISU like it or not are here to stay.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 3, 2013
  • #99
dadgad said:
This is probably the best reason of all.

Get rid of Sisu AND their sycophants:claping hands:
Click to expand...

Says the "supporter" who can't even name the winning goal scorer on one occasion. Been to the Ricoh since it was built?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
First Prev 3 of 3
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?