Sisu, CCC discussions not before JR 28th Nov(?) (3 Viewers)

GaryPendrysEyes · Nov 3, 2013

According to Michael, In KCIC newsletter...

I guess Sisu won't withdraw the JR and CCC won't meet until the legals are out of the way...

ohitsaidwalker king power · Nov 3, 2013

I tend to agree. I cannot see meaningful talks with such an event hanging over the respective parties- success of the review(either way) would mean a significant leverage in such discussions one would assume... maybe they'll just have talks about talks?

Nice signature by the way..

Ashdown1 · Nov 3, 2013

The lawyers, administrators and plethora of associated pen pushers associated with all of this appear to be the big winners !

dongonzalos · Nov 3, 2013

Shame SISU won't drop it, as it is pointless and will cost them money.

It is not going to even be a bargaining tool as CCC are not going to meet them until after it has been kicked out.

They may as well drop it as a good will gesture setting a better tone for the talks

SonOfSnoz · Nov 3, 2013

Shame on the boards from the mid 90's.
Sisu have to resort to such tactics to keep our club's heart beating!

GaryPendrysEyes · Nov 3, 2013

ohitsaidwalker king power said:
I tend to agree. I cannot see meaningful talks with such an event hanging over the respective parties- success of the review(either way) would mean a significant leverage in such discussions one would assume... maybe they'll just have talks about talks?

Nice signature by the way..

Haha yes thanks for that signature, kinda sums things up, re their use and abuse of our club...

dongonzalos · Nov 3, 2013

It is a strange move by SISU
I note the judge said SISU will have to pay Councils costs again.
The aim was to tie them up in knots through expensive litigation.
I assume they have legal protection insurance.
So it probably is costing them next to nothing?

RoboCCFC90 · Nov 3, 2013

CWR said yesterday that they were under the impression that talks would take place "sooner rather than later".

SonOfSnoz · Nov 3, 2013

dongonzalos said:
It is a strange move by SISU
I note the judge said SISU will have to pay Councils costs again.
The aim was to tie them up in knots through expensive litigation.
I assume they have legal protection insurance.
So it probably is costing them next to nothing?

Just hope they don't sell Wilson or Christie to fund the legals then!
#worried

ohitsaidwalker king power · Nov 3, 2013

GaryPendrysEyes said:
Haha yes thanks for that signature, kinda sums things up, re their use and abuse of our club...

Agreed- keep the same drumbeat until they are home!! :claping hands:

dongonzalos · Nov 3, 2013

SonOfSnoz said:
Just hope they don't sell Wilson or Christie to fund the legals then!
#worried

Exactly I wish they would just drop it.also it is another month not at the Ricoh so another aprox 200k income lost by SISU

GaryPendrysEyes · Nov 3, 2013

dongonzalos said:
Exactly I wish they would just drop it.also it is another month not at the Ricoh so another aprox 200k income lost by SISU

Yep, more indication that they want to pressure to buy real cheap and make £10's millions recoup money out of Coventry taxpayers for their investors...

ohitsaidwalker king power · Nov 3, 2013

GaryPendrysEyes said:
Yep, more indication that they want to pressure to buy real cheap and make £10's millions recoup money out of Coventry taxpayers for their investors...

You lost the signature...

dadgad · Nov 3, 2013

This won't cost Sisu anything, just more debt shoved on club.

GaryPendrysEyes · Nov 3, 2013

They seem to have lost any interest in making money out of the club, it's all about the Ricoh, dirty deeds done dirt cheap...to quote AC/DC...

...siggy...!

Kingokings204 · Nov 3, 2013

Just drop the JR as it has no chance we can all see it and it serves no purpose anyway so lets drop the JR and get talking in time for Christmas. I have this dream of boxing day against Peterboro being a sell out at the Ricoh. (Im a nutter I know)

BurbageSkyBlues · Nov 3, 2013

dadgad said:
This won't cost Sisu anything, just more debt shoved on club.

Exactly. A point that is missed by many, it seems?

Steve.B50 · Nov 3, 2013

GaryPendrysEyes said:
According to Michael, In KCIC newsletter...

I guess Sisu won't withdraw the JR and CCC won't meet until the legals are out of the way...

Where did this information cone from, both groups have now openly said they would meet, not seen anything from anyone saying this is part of the agreement to meet?

bradwellskyblues · Nov 3, 2013

can someone help/enlighten me as stuart linnell on friday said no talks till after jr however on saturday this had changed to talks sooner rather than later ,i did not hear the explanation for the change in postion

GaryPendrysEyes · Nov 3, 2013

The Newsletter went out 11am today-- but I see Michael is around maybe he can clarify if this info is up to date or not....

skybluetony176 · Nov 3, 2013

did anybody really think it would happen before the end of JR anyway?

i guess it will be too much to hope that sh1tsu will drop the JR in order to push on quickly with what the paying customers want and not what their investors want.

it seems pretty clear (following this weeks failed court action) that JR isn't going to be a bargaining chip like sh1tsu possibly thought but at the same time there probably isn't that much more debt to saddle the club with to see it through on the off chance that they get somewhere with it.

rightumpty · Nov 3, 2013

Just a thought here. Lets assume we reach the 3rd round of the FA Cup and draw Man U or similar, at home. Where do you think Shitsu would want to play it. At Northampton, the Ricoh or away ??????????????????????????

Sisu, CCC discussions not before JR 28th Nov(?) (3 Viewers)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

New Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency