View attachment 3152
The stated three to seven year time period for ownership fits, I believe that the 3 year plan for the Premiership failed so the seven year plan for Ricoh ownership kicked in. We only have to wait until Decmber 2014 for the seventh anniversary of ownership and SISU investors will be asking more serious questions.
But it's out there in court documents that SISU's standard is eight to ten years.
Oh yeah, you also need someone to dig to ask if it's the same funds now, or a fresh set.
I would have thought that the University of Pennsylvania is still a major investor.
"SISU are NOT an evil hedge fund"
No - I think they are the devil itself.
Now if Les Reid had got in contact with the trustees of their pension fund... nope that is almost investigative journalism, far too much to hope for!
The list of trustees is quite long but one name stands out (Jon Huntsman) and there are numerous connections with this university, Joy and husband Bill received their MBA's here at the Wharton Business School.
The list of trustees is quite long but one name stands out (Jon Huntsman) and there are numerous connections with this university, Joy and husband Bill received their MBA's here at the Wharton Business School.
I don't believe SISU or Seppala are connected with Huntsman any more.
The connection with Huntsman came about when SISU and several other private equity firms provided some of the funds for a management buyout of a company called Admat, a manufacturer of resins and adhesives. A short while later, Huntsman bought out the company and gave the loan holders a minority stake ( less than 10%) in the new company, Huntsman Advanced Materials. As part of the deal, the private equity firms were given a seat on the board to look out for their interests and this position went to Joy Seppala. The Huntsman company bought out this minority stake holding within a year.
The sale of the Huntsman stake in 2006 appears to be the high spot for SISU and flush with the proceeds they moved to new offices, Joy bought her bling house and, sadly, they invested the rest in CCFC.
SISU are NOT an evil hedge fund, particularly in relation to Coventry City, as they are a private equity fund.
“The most significant difference between the two types of firms is in is their underlying business model and how they approach their investments.
Private equity firms tend to invest in private companies that are longer-term, ill-liquid assets with the intent to buy, grow and exit these portfolio companies over a three to seven year period. Over the course of an investment, a private equity firm will address capital structure, management team, strategic growth and fundamental business model issues core to the investment.
In contrast, hedge funds primarily focus on investing in more tradable (and therefore usually more liquid) securities such as equities, bonds, derivatives, futures, commodities, foreign exchange, swaps, etc. As such, hedge funds are likely to hold investments for a much shorter duration, sometimes for merely minutes or seconds with no intent to fundamentally alter the course of direction of a direct investment in a company.”
http://www.privateequityinfo.com/blog/2009/06/private-equity-vs-hedge-funds/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_equity_fund
Yeah, I know all that stuff..
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?