Because mowbray and Venus don't set the budget nick that's why.
They work to one, the same as every other manager in the league.
Isn't that what makes a good League 1 manager?
I have to agree with Nick. Don't get me wrong I am very happy with Mowbray in charge but there is a niggle in the back of my mind knowing that he is not a league one manager and is trying to run and attract players as if we are higher. We really need a good league one manager for the transfer market.
In my opinion last years squad was the best we had in years and we massively under achieved with an 8th place finished. This year is going to be a struggle and I would be surprised if we got relegated.
I do hope I'm very, very wrong of course.
So which one called the Transfer market wrong.
The fact that Transfer fees were likely to rocket this summer in the back of record breaking TV revenues was well understood. Yet we sold our best asset ( Maddison) just before the boom. The fee now looks crazily under valued.
If the reality is that we were short of cash to run the business then I would reluctantly accept that rationale but right now it just looks like incompetence.
Because mowbray and Venus don't set the budget nick that's why.
Why are the only options SISU or Anderson? What about Mowbray / Venus?
Did TM say he spoke to Joy and told her you can't get anywhere if you sell off your most promising young talent?
I can't recall the specifics but was t it something like that.
Regarding Maddison
Attendances increased and budget has gone down I thinkPerhaps Anderson doesn't either. Your budget is set by projected income. That will be based on what we achieved last year.
You could argue the fans set it.
Attendances increased and budget has gone down I think
Did he? Was that before signing Jones on a 4 year deal?
Again, I think people see the Transfer Deadline Day and £1billion spend and get carried away and forgetting we are in League 1.
Again. No one's looking at Man City and the other team's in the premier league that have contributed most to the £1B. You also seem to forgetting that we're in league one by indicating that this is what people are doing. Most people (if not all) are comparing us to teams like Bradford and Sheffield from league one. Your accusation/assumption on what people are looking at is unfounded.
Yes, and you can't really compare us to Sheffield United either can you?
It would be more appropriate to compare us to Sheffield United than it would to compare us to the clubs who are responsible for the vast majority of the £1B. Who's comparing us to those clubs like you claim? No one I know and no one I can remember seeing post on here. It's something that you've fabricated all by yourself.
Have you seen social media?
It is the way people are banging on about only signing 2 players, as if everything has to be about deadline day. I doubt many even remember we have signed Jones in this window.
It was moaning, moaning that we hadn't signed anyone then....<silence>...moaning, moaning that it was only a kid from WBA.
We are what we are a third division club, Maddison was a third division player with about 20 games to his name and back from long term injury. We don't know the fee anything from 2 to 7 million been quoted, suspect with add pn the figure to be no more than 4 million.i haven't noticed huge amounts being splashed about by other clubs in our league, Sheffield have signed plenty but the likes of Clarke and Fleck cost no fees, probably hog josh wages though.
Attendances increased and budget has gone down I think
I haven't got a clue whether it has gone up, gone down or stayed the same.
It appears last year's was miscalculated (embarrassingly). SISU are not very good at running things.
But regardless who owns the club you should run within your budget.
The problem with football is Schweinsteiger 119,000 per week and played 18 times for Manchester United. The fact Man City resorted to loaning Hart, Bony, Mangala and Nasri be cc a use no one will take on their wages. The trouble is these clubs set the economy and it has a knock on effect. Fans need to start just enjoying football within realistic parameters.
At least we are trying to develop home grown talent. It should be something our fans are proud of. Even if we cannot beproud of our owners.
How much did we sell him for and how much do you think he'd be worth now 6 months later?So which one called the Transfer market wrong.
The fact that Transfer fees were likely to rocket this summer in the back of record breaking TV revenues was well understood. Yet we sold our best asset ( Maddison) just before the boom. The fee now looks crazily under valued.
If the reality is that we were short of cash to run the business then I would reluctantly accept that rationale but right now it just looks like incompetence.
I haven't got a clue whether it has gone up, gone down or stayed the same.
It appears last year's was miscalculated (embarrassingly). SISU are not very good at running things.
But regardless who owns the club you should run within your budget.
The problem with football is Schweinsteiger 119,000 per week and played 18 times for Manchester United. The fact Man City resorted to loaning Hart, Bony, Mangala and Nasri because no one will take on their wages. The trouble is these clubs set the economy and it has a knock on effect. Fans need to start just enjoying football within realistic parameters.
At least we are trying to develop home grown talent. It should be something our fans are proud of. Even if we cannot be proud of our owners.
And sold Che Adams for 2 million. Straight into <whatever the Sheff Utd owner's name is> pocket!We are what we are a third division club, Maddison was a third division player with about 20 games to his name and back from long term injury. We don't know the fee anything from 2 to 7 million been quoted, suspect with add pn the figure to be no more than 4 million.i haven't noticed huge amounts being splashed about by other clubs in our league, Sheffield have signed plenty but the likes of Clarke and Fleck cost no fees, probably highish wages though.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?