Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Simon Gilbert, has there been an FL response? (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter skybluetony176
  • Start date Jun 17, 2014
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 5 of 6 Next Last
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
  • Jun 19, 2014
  • #141
lordsummerisle said:
Actual spend by club or council very little then.
Click to expand...

Here we go again, no, Tesco did not pay directly, they bought the land at an agreed premium on the original purchase price.

The decontamination & build projects were not awarded by Tesco.
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 19, 2014
  • #142
Jack Griffin said:
Here we go again, no, Tesco did not pay directly, they bought the land at an agreed premium on the original purchase price.

The decontamination & build projects were not awarded by Tesco.
Click to expand...

And again nobody seems to know when exactly work started and when it totally fell apart and the council took over, and how much, if any money was properly put into it by the club.

Did the club start it and then been able to pay any bills so the council stepped in?

If they did start it and then failed to be able to complete, then who owned the land at the outset?

Of course if it all fell apart before even getting close to starting owning land, decontamination and building, then why on Earth did the club continue, or the council for that matter if the club was so obviously financially fucked?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #143
In October 2003 CCC approved the Coventry Arena project. The budget was set as £113.3m and achieved practicle completion on 19th August 2005 with an overspend of 2.9m. As I said before our club never owned the land. They never paid for the decontamination. They never started the project. It never got past the stage of showing us pictures. Does this sound familiar?

The main aim of the project was to regenerate the former gasworks site to provide a multi-use arena providing employment and leisure opportunities for people from the city. There had been many attempts to do something with the old gasworks site over the 30 years it was left as a derelict eyesore, but nothing ever happened because of the funding needed. The regeneration of the area attracted 9.2m of grants and CCC put 10m of their own money in. Out of the original 75 acres there are still approx 14 acres to be developed. So nearly 20% of valuable land from the old gasworks are still available. This was valued at approx 5m in 2006 so the value of it now will be a fair bit more. The aim was to create 2,900 jobs. After 12 months 2,600 jobs had been created, and this was before the casino had opened.

So as you can see there were reasons for CCC to continue. It wasn't just for our football club. And yes our football club was absolutely fucked by this time. CCC could have just developed the land and made a lot of money out of it. But we got the arena built. It was never going to be a freebie. Nearly 56m of funding was required on top of what Tescos paid. And as I said previously our club paid £1,758,000 for which they got a 50% share of ACL. An outstanding loan of 21m was needed. This was paid for by the leasehold taken out by ACL.

Any more questions Lord? Just check the link I put up earlier. It is a government document so will be the most accurate list of the build you will find.
 

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #144
Astute said:
In October 2003 CCC approved the Coventry Arena project. The budget was set as £113.3m and achieved practicle completion on 19th August 2005 with an overspend of 2.9m. As I said before our club never owned the land. They never paid for the decontamination. They never started the project. It never got past the stage of showing us pictures. Does this sound familiar?

The main aim of the project was to regenerate the former gasworks site to provide a multi-use arena providing employment and leisure opportunities for people from the city. There had been many attempts to do something with the old gasworks site over the 30 years it was left as a derelict eyesore, but nothing ever happened because of the funding needed. The regeneration of the area attracted 9.2m of grants and CCC put 10m of their own money in. Out of the original 75 acres there are still approx 14 acres to be developed. So nearly 20% of valuable land from the old gasworks are still available. This was valued at approx 5m in 2006 so the value of it now will be a fair bit more. The aim was to create 2,900 jobs. After 12 months 2,600 jobs had been created, and this was before the casino had opened.

So as you can see there were reasons for CCC to continue. It wasn't just for our football club. And yes our football club was absolutely fucked by this time. CCC could have just developed the land and made a lot of money out of it. But we got the arena built. It was never going to be a freebie. Nearly 56m of funding was required on top of what Tescos paid. And as I said previously our club paid £1,758,000 for which they got a 50% share of ACL. An outstanding loan of 21m was needed. This was paid for by the leasehold taken out by ACL.

Any more questions Lord? Just check the link I put up earlier. It is a government document so will be the most accurate list of the build you will find.
Click to expand...

To be fair, the articles from 1999, all seemed to be saying that "work will start in the next few weeks/months" on decontamination, obviously never started at all.

Forgot about this article by Neville Hadsley from WSC about the whole fiasco, probably worth a thread on it's own to be fair.

http://www.wsc.co.uk/the-archive/906-Grounds/2312-ambitious-expansions
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #145
Jack Griffin said:
Here we go again, no, Tesco did not pay directly, they bought the land at an agreed premium on the original purchase price.

The decontamination & build projects were not awarded by Tesco.
Click to expand...
why did Tesco submit the planning app for the Arena?
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #146
lordsummerisle said:
To be fair, the articles from 1999, all seemed to be saying that "work will start in the next few weeks/months" on decontamination, obviously never started at all.

Forgot about this article by Neville Hadsley from WSC about the whole fiasco, probably worth a thread on it's own to be fair.

http://www.wsc.co.uk/the-archive/906-Grounds/2312-ambitious-expansions
Click to expand...

A decent read although it took me over an hour. Having to work for a living today. Shows how much of a shambles our club became before SISU.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #147
Why did the Arena cost £113m? Equivalent stadia cost less than half of that.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #148
fernandopartridge said:
why did Tesco submit the planning app for the Arena?
Click to expand...

They didn't. They paid for the land and decontamination of it. This had to be done before they could build their own property. CCC did everything to do with the stadium.

It was said to be their most expensive site outside London IIRC.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #149
fernandopartridge said:
Why did the Arena cost £113m? Equivalent stadia cost less than half of that.
Click to expand...

115m. It wasn't just for the build. It included the cost of the land and decontamination as well as infrastructure and more. Take a look at the link I posted. It explains it all including where they tried to get the train station built.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #150
Paul Fletcher:

By the time I arrived in Coventry the deal had been struck; in simple terms it was going to be a joint venture between the football club and the council with both parties owning 50 per cent of the equity.


As the football club did not have the money to complete the purchase of the land, which would then enable them to sell off half of it to Tesco, it was agreed that Coventry City Council would purchase the land, then conclude the deal with Tesco, all as part of their joint venture agreement.
But mysteriously, once the purchase of the land and the sale to Tesco had been completed, Coventry City Council informed the football club that they were unable to share with them the profit from the sale of the land due to ‘state aid’ implications.
Instead, they offered Coventry City FC a 50 per cent share in the company that would operate the Ricoh Arena, but they, Coventry City Council would own all the equity in the property.


What I have explained in one paragraph took over 12 months to sort out and over £1m was spent on lawyers’ fees as the state aid fiasco continued through to a conclusion, which involved numerous highly paid lawyers As compensation the council offered Coventry City Football Club 50 per cent of the operating profit from the Ricoh Arena and the business plan forecasts were looking very favourable.
Click to expand...
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #151
Astute said:
They didn't. They paid for the land and decontamination of it. This had to be done before they could build their own property. CCC did everything to do with the stadium.

It was said to be their most expensive site outside London IIRC.
Click to expand...
I've posted a link to it before. Tesco's logo was all over the architects drawings for the Arena. I believe they submitted the plans and master planned the whole area.

CCFC submitted plans in 1998 for a 40k stadium which included a supermarket, other retail and restaurants.

The revised plans for a smaller stadium are missing from the planning portal but the originals are still there.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #152
Astute said:
115m. It wasn't just for the build. It included the cost of the land and decontamination as well as infrastructure and more. Take a look at the link I posted. It explains it all including where they tried to get the train station built.
Click to expand...
Do other stadia not have infrastructure costs then? The decontamination was a few million. I am of the view that £113m is the entire build cost for the Arena and Tesco tbh.
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #153
fernandopartridge said:
Do other stadia not have infrastructure costs then? The decontamination was a few million. I am of the view that £113m is the entire build cost for the Arena and Tesco tbh.
Click to expand...

Well send a FOI to CCC to ask that question.
 

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #154
Jack Griffin said:
Well send a FOI to CCC to ask that question.
Click to expand...
I might do that actually. I might also ask how much they paid for the land from British Gas.
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #155
fernandopartridge said:
I might do that actually. I might also ask how much they paid for the land from British Gas.
Click to expand...

The link lordsummerisle posted above by says it was purchased from a German Construction Company.. but then there is an article by Bryan Richardson I read yesterday where he states "We bought 88 acres from British Gas"... I'm suspecting the original construction company put up some cash to by the land from BG and owned it for while, then pulled out.. strewth knows, there is always another twist.

The land purchase cost for CCC is a matter of public record..

Land acquisition...................................................................£24,099,000
Decomination and infrastructure (expenditure in kind).....................£17,000,000
Site Profiling..........................................................................£1,975,000
Total Land Related................................................................£43,074,000
Click to expand...
 
Last edited by a moderator: Jun 20, 2014

lordsummerisle

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #156
Jack Griffin said:
The link lordsummerisle posted above by says it was purchased from a German Construction Company.. but then there is an article by Bryan Richardson I read yesterday where he states "We bought 88 acres from British Gas"... I'm suspecting the original construction company put up some cash to by the land from BG and owned it for while, then pulled out.. strewth knows, there is always another twist.
Click to expand...

I'm sure that Richardson made quite a few quid out of the land somehow.
 

letsallsingtogether

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 20, 2014
  • #157
Maybe he was the old meter maid on the site.


lordsummerisle said:
I'm sure that Richardson made quite a few quid out of the land somehow.
Click to expand...
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 22, 2014
  • #158
so, no news then ?
 

James Smith

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 23, 2014
  • #159
Jack Griffin said:
The link lordsummerisle posted above by says it was purchased from a German Construction Company.. but then there is an article by Bryan Richardson I read yesterday where he states "We bought 88 acres from British Gas"... I'm suspecting the original construction company put up some cash to by the land from BG and owned it for while, then pulled out.. strewth knows, there is always another twist.

The land purchase cost for CCC is a matter of public record..
Click to expand...

I thought that the construction company was supposed to be Birse and they threw in the towel when having built the crisp bowl for Leicester, the East Midlands club ran into financial difficulties and couldn't pay for it all. Sure I read somewhere that they said they wouldn't touch football club stadia after the hit they took from Leicester.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 23, 2014
  • #160
James Smith said:
I thought that the construction company was supposed to be Birse and they threw in the towel when having built the crisp bowl for Leicester, the East Midlands club ran into financial difficulties and couldn't pay for it all. Sure I read somewhere that they said they wouldn't touch football club stadia after the hit they took from Leicester.
Click to expand...

Which could be why SISU haven't been able to get this ground of theirs built for free
 
S

Spionkop

New Member
  • Jun 23, 2014
  • #161
The enormous outlays on land are astonishing, looking back.
Just the money spent on 'site profiling' whatever that is, could have been better spent on buying houses around the Highfield Road ground and creating space for a revamp. In the community. A ten minute walk from town. What were these people thinking of? It's gone I know. Yet what a bad move.

Land acquisition....................................... ............................£24,099,000
Decomination and infrastructure (expenditure in kind).....................£17,000,000
Site Profiling......................................... .................................£1,975,000
Total Land Related........................................... .....................£43,074,000
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 26, 2014
  • #162
any news on this yet ?
 
K

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 26, 2014
  • #163
ccfcway said:
any news on this yet ?
Click to expand...

Seems the diversion tactic from the back to the Ricoh saga has worked I see.

Makes me mad. Wasn't this meant to be paid and if it hasn't why hasn't it? Us fans deserve to know some truth please
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 26, 2014
  • #164
Kingokings204 said:
Seems the diversion tactic from the back to the Ricoh saga has worked I see.

Makes me mad. Wasn't this meant to be paid and if it hasn't why hasn't it? Us fans deserve to know some truth please
Click to expand...

I agree, thats what I was thinking.
 
S

Spionkop

New Member
  • Jun 27, 2014
  • #165
Looks like Sisu still aren't paying their bills.
 
J

Jack Griffin

Guest
  • Jun 27, 2014
  • #166
Site profiling expensive, have you seen the hourly hire rate for a scraper these days, LOL
 

Rob S

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 27, 2014
  • #167
From what I understand, £590,000 is sitting in an escrow account awaiting the final figure from the liquidator. Apparently it is the liquidator's figure that is key to what the final amount will be and there is still some work being done to finalise that. I don't think that there's anything to worry about re: points deductions etc. it's just a case of waiting for the liquidator.

A call to Appleton's people might get some detail on the liquidation and timescales.
 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 27, 2014
  • #168
we should run a poll

What do you think will happen 1st

1) the opening of our new stadium
2) the liquidation process to be completed by Appleton
 
P

Phil Babbs Ballbag

New Member
  • Jun 27, 2014
  • #169
I'm a bit confused by this. Was this £590k not a charge to Otium? If so, why is the liquidator involved? Only CCFC Holdings & CCFC Ltd are being wound up.
 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 27, 2014
  • #170
ccfcway said:
we should run a poll

What do you think will happen 1st

1) the opening of our new stadium
2) the liquidation process to be completed by Appleton
Click to expand...

3) none of the above

 

skybluetony176

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 27, 2014
  • #171
Rob S said:
From what I understand, £590,000 is sitting in an escrow account awaiting the final figure from the liquidator. Apparently it is the liquidator's figure that is key to what the final amount will be and there is still some work being done to finalise that. I don't think that there's anything to worry about re: points deductions etc. it's just a case of waiting for the liquidator.

A call to Appleton's people might get some detail on the liquidation and timescales.
Click to expand...

If that is the case, would it be too simple for the FL to confirm this? Or from the FL's point of view is this not the case?

I cant remember the FL ever publicly saying how they came to the £ 590K figure, just left it open to a lot of if's, but's, maybe's and presumptions. Unless anyone knows better?
 
Last edited: Jun 27, 2014

RegTheDonk

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 27, 2014
  • #172
Rob S said:
From what I understand, £590,000 is sitting in an escrow account awaiting the final figure from the liquidator. Apparently it is the liquidator's figure that is key to what the final amount will be and there is still some work being done to finalise that. I don't think that there's anything to worry about re: points deductions etc. it's just a case of waiting for the liquidator.

A call to Appleton's people might get some detail on the liquidation and timescales.
Click to expand...

Shouldn't really matter though should it? SISU/Avro/Otium/Joy/Whoever were given a date to pay up. If there's a dealy, thats their problem not the FL's. Threaten them with revocking the golden share, Appleton will conclude business the following day.

Good job SISU don't owe the money to Wonga. It would be one shady law firm Vs a non-existant one.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 27, 2014
  • #173
RegTheDonk said:
Shouldn't really matter though should it? SISU/Avro/Otium/Joy/Whoever were given a date to pay up. If there's a dealy, thats their problem not the FL's. Threaten them with revocking the golden share, Appleton will conclude business the following day.

Good job SISU don't owe the money to Wonga. It would be one shady law firm Vs a non-existant one.
Click to expand...

A have already recovered some of the money. It must be clarified what is the correct amount to pay.
 

Astute

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 27, 2014
  • #174
Grendel said:
A have already recovered some of the money. It must be clarified what is the correct amount to pay.
Click to expand...

590k is the correct amount to pay. But SISU would prefer to waste 1m so they don't have to pay ACL anything if they can find a loophole. They even tried to make out that 500k had been paid from elsewhere when we all know it was 300k.

Or did the FL say that they must pay 590k but if anything was paid by anybody with nothing to do with SISU and nothing to do with the 590k settlement that they could do a reduced payment?
 

torchomatic

Well-Known Member
  • Jun 27, 2014
  • #175
I thought they'd already received £300K? Are ACL saying then that they should have £890K?

Astute said:
590k is the correct amount to pay. But SISU would prefer to waste 1m so they don't have to pay ACL anything if they can find a loophole. They even tried to make out that 500k had been paid from elsewhere when we all know it was 300k.

Or did the FL say that they must pay 590k but if anything was paid by anybody with nothing to do with SISU and nothing to do with the 590k settlement that they could do a reduced payment?
Click to expand...
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 5 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?