shmmeee
Well-Known Member
Not sure but when he was appointed at Stoke it said they’d have to pay compo because technically Robins was only put on gardening leave, not sacked.
what did we get paid for Robins?
lampard was asked after the game why he didn’t, he said there were players in front of him that deserved minutes before him, Lampard rates him, players do as well, he’ll get gamesWe were 4 up against Plymouth and he didn’t get a chance
if Lampard thought anything of him, he would have gave him some mins then
Can you give a guesstimate of the outgoings annually against the inward investment?The club will be losing 5million a season at least. That will be where some of your money has gone. The owner isn’t going to indefinitely keep covering losses. I think people on here have real short term memories when it comes to previous ownership. We’re going to trade players where we can to continue to invest in the squad and club as a whole. There’s no magic money tree.
why would he? we didn't play a formation that needed wingers
He isn’t miles away, he couldn’t have started yesterday with a back 5If he was seen as a first team ready player he'd have started yesterday, he's clearly miles away.
Not sure but when he was appointed at Stoke it said they’d have to pay compo because technically Robins was only put on gardening leave, not sacked.
I was told he is well thought of in training by all coaches. Also heard he is quicker than MVE in a foot race, I'm intrigued to see him play.lampard was asked after the game why he didn’t, he said there were players in front of him that deserved minutes before him, Lampard rates him, players do as well, he’ll get games
He isn’t miles away, he couldn’t have started yesterday with a back 5
Rates him enough to change the whole formation rather than play him on the right v Norwich. Hope I’m wrong but I think we have another Tavares. Good little player that’s not championship quality.lampard was asked after the game why he didn’t, he said there were players in front of him that deserved minutes before him, Lampard rates him, players do as well, he’ll get games
Rates him enough to change the whole formation rather than play him on the right v Norwich. Hope I’m wrong but I think we have another Tavares. Good little player that’s not championship quality.
Genuinely, if he rated him, we would have seen more than 2 seconds of him. Especially as Tats has been dying for a breather. Hardly likely to say this to the press.
could get a run out on saturday. or at least a more meaningful sub appearance.Rates him enough to change the whole formation rather than play him on the right v Norwich. Hope I’m wrong but I think we have another Tavares. Good little player that’s not championship quality.
Genuinely, if he rated him, we would have seen more than 2 seconds of him. Especially as Tats has been dying for a breather. Hardly likely to say this to the press.
or he thought a back three was the best wayThat's sort of my point.
He changed formation, in all probability due to injuries.
If he thought he was ready he could have stuck with 4 3 3 and played him on the right.
My understanding is that DK will inject cash to cover losses each season but aspirational is operational break even. That won’t be achieved this season. No championship club has achieved operational break even. DK will inject money for players if they are deemed the right fit. Player trading has to supplement this. Anyone who says DK has no money is clueless or has an agenda. How much he is prepared to inject is the question.Can you give a guesstimate of the outgoings annually against the inward investment?
We were never going to play 433. And for 91 mins it was a brilliant move, it wasn’t the game to give him his first start or bring him onYes, that's the reason we started with a back 5.
Lampard as shown he'll play someone out of position on the left, but he wasn't prepared to start with him on the right.
or he thought a back three was the best way
saka was on the bench
he Changed the formation to give us a chance and it worked,Rates him enough to change the whole formation rather than play him on the right v Norwich. Hope I’m wrong but I think we have another Tavares. Good little player that’s not championship quality.
Genuinely, if he rated him, we would have seen more than 2 seconds of him. Especially as Tats has been dying for a breather. Hardly likely to say this to the press.
he Changed the formation to give us a chance and it worked,
Did it?he Changed the formation to give us a chance and it worked,
you Know it didDid it?
I agree 100% with that tbf.Rates him enough to change the whole formation rather than play him on the right v Norwich. Hope I’m wrong but I think we have another Tavares. Good little player that’s not championship quality.
Genuinely, if he rated him, we would have seen more than 2 seconds of him. Especially as Tats has been dying for a breather. Hardly likely to say this to the press.
he Changed the formation to give us a chance and it worked,
what said they’d have to pay compo?
on garden leave we would have been paying his salary, and other entitlements, and depending on his notice period (if such a thing exists in managers’ contracts) he would’ve just ridden it out and then joined Stoke to avoid any compensation, which would be minimal anyway given we’ve not lost anything as he had been given notice and his contract terminated
I doubt very much what you believe is actually correct
You really want me to answer that Did you watch the gameworked how?
You really want me to answer that Did you watch the game
O think only us of a certain vintage would know thisNo! Luton Airport
We got battered all game but apart from that it workedyou Know it did
What about that isn’t true?I mean that’s not true but OK. We had a fully fit squad at the start of the season and he didn’t.
I should think he will yeah, then I guess we can make a judgement. Hopefully there are at least signs there, regardless he needs to be playing.could get a run out on saturday. or at least a more meaningful sub appearance.
Ended up in Nottingham insteadThe title says signing within 48 hours. Is that bailed on or just meeting DK and then 'thinking it over'?
532 gave us a better chance than the 433 we’ve been playing, you don’t play wingers in a 532, if we were 433 we’ve wouldn’t of got to the 91st min winning 1-0, they’d of battered usI’d be interested in your answer
Is that a clue, "reservations?"I'm optimistic as always that we will have a positive window, despite some reservations.
532 gave us a better chance than the 433 we’ve been playing, you don’t play wingers in a 532, if we were 433 we’ve wouldn’t of got to the 91st min winning 1-0, they’d of battered us
They battered us 0-1. For 91 minsthey did batter us and the second half was abysmal.
What about that isn’t true?
Made most his career appearances and goals at ST. As for our team now, EMC and Wright are our two best attacking players and they both can’t play LW. So either one of them plays RW or Wright plays as a striker.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?