D
You would assume that a man in his position would not be stupid enough to base his entire argument upon a document that doesn't really exist........... then again......
You say you agreed and signed a deal with the council for part ownership of the Ricoh Arena.
No handshakes, no room for misinterpretation. A tangible, existing document.
Then show us this document Tim. Banish the doubters. Prove that ACL and the council have acted disingenuously.
You do still have this document don't you Tim?
James Smith said:Point 9
Okay so just show us the signed document Tim, as that would prove the council are liars as you claim. No need to talk about handshakes that have been misinterpreted or who said what to whom.TF in CET said:This deal was documented, signed by all parties and then reneged on by the council. The council made the problem even worse by then using public funds, something that is now subject to the judicial review proceedings
Just show us the document, you can can't you?
He is not me!Are you James Smith or just a plagiarist?
Are you James Smith or just a plagiarist?
You say you agreed and signed a deal with the council for part ownership of the Ricoh Arena.
No handshakes, no room for misinterpretation. A tangible, existing document.
Then show us this document Tim. Banish the doubters. Prove that ACL and the council have acted disingenuously.
You do still have this document don't you Tim?
I thought I was Tim Fisher? I'm having a personality crisis on this forum. Never have I witnessed such paranoia.
I thought I was Tim Fisher? I'm having a personality crisis on this forum. Never have I witnessed such paranoia.
As I posted in the other thread:
No worries, probably deserved its own thread anyway given the severity of the claim by TF.Sorry James there are a lot of posts and threads to sift through. If I missed yours, it wasn't intentional.
But I'm glad I wasn't the only person to have been intrigued by this illusive document.
You say you agreed and signed a deal with the council for part ownership of the Ricoh Arena.
No handshakes, no room for misinterpretation. A tangible, existing document.
Then show us this document Tim. Banish the doubters. Prove that ACL and the council have acted disingenuously.
You do still have this document don't you Tim?
Seeing as it's TF who has made the claim about this document, surely it's up to him to back it up with some proof.Why don't you ask Mutton or PWKH? Surely if it is a signed document they can remember signing it.
It is probably amongst the documents filed to the court by sisu.
We're all Tim Fisher on here.
Seeing as it's TF who has made the claim about this document, surely it's up to him to back it up with some proof.
If he can prove this, he may well win some fans over.
If he can't, it will probably just be lost amongst all the other 'fisherisms' like we are 'debt free' etc etc
When ACL claimed it was ccfc who renerged on the agreement nobody asked them to substantiate their claim. So why should there be different rules?
Anyway, if such a signed document exists it will surely be included in the filings to the court.
When ACL claimed it was ccfc who renerged on the agreement nobody asked them to substantiate their claim. So why should there be different rules?
Anyway, if such a signed document exists it will surely be included in the filings to the court.
I do wonder whether some of the posters on here could satisfy their curiosity by making a Freedom of Information request to Coventry City Council.
When ACL claimed it was ccfc who renerged on the agreement nobody asked them to substantiate their claim. So why should there be different rules?
Yes, we all totally accepted TF's entirely plausible explanation that the handshake on the deal was just a 'goodbye' handshake and not a 'deal agreed' handshake.
As Tim made the claim it would be up to him to prove it existed in a court of law.ACL claimed that a verbal agreement had been made. If the other party denies this, it's difficult to prove.
TF has claimed that he has documentary evidence. This is very easy to prove.
Hence the "different rules".
As Tim made the claim it would be up to him to prove it existed in a court of law.
I do wonder if anyone ever thought it was a good idea to vet what Tim plans to say before he is let loose in the media spotlight.If there was a signed document and Tim had it I am sure SISU would have been in court months ago!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?