J
Not fit for the job, says one thing to please fans but after research usually means the exact opposite is true.
How he ever finds work again in football I don't know, who will fans of any club believe a word he ever says from now on
His persistence in employing Thorn meant that he should have got a long time ago. Funny that the majority on wanted to keep Thorn, so surely they should have some faith/belief in Fisher?
He'd fit in well at Blackburn
His persistence in employing Thorn meant that he should have got a long time ago. Funny that the majority on wanted to keep Thorn, so surely they should have some faith/belief in Fisher?
Not fit for the job, says one thing to please fans but after research usually means the exact opposite is true.
How he ever finds work again in football I don't know, no fans of any club in the future will believe a word that comes out of that big mouth of his again
Thorn should have gone last January when it had become crystal that he weren't up to the task of saving us from relegation yet dim Tim let him have the whole summer to bring in his own players and then sacked him a few games into the season
This was his first job in football and, with his record here, will undoubtedly be his last.
Yes that makes sense.
If you agree with one decision a person makes. You should agree with every decision they make no matter what it is.
Is that not the way the world works?
There would have been outrage on here if he had of been sacked. The most anti-sisu posters are also those who backed Thorn the most. How can they be so critical of a board who gave someone who they believe to have one of the brightest careers in management?
He certainly showed a lot of bravery to stick by one of the brightest talents in the game for so long, surely you should give him a lot of credit for it?
Not me as I was against his appointment from the off but just because some were behind the manager doesn't mean they approved of the mayhem the owners fronted by TF were causing in other areas of the club.
There would have been outrage on here if he had of been sacked. The most anti-sisu posters are also those who backed Thorn the most. How can they be so critical of a board who gave someone who they believe to have one of the brightest careers in management?
RPHunt, I thought he had worked at Charlton Athletic before, but I agree with you it is almost definitely his last job in football
his comments about building a statue of Joy Seppala next to Jimmy Hill for all the good work she has done for the club prove that alone..................
Controversial maybe but I actually believe Tim Fisher is the only board member of CCFC ever to stand up to the Council. Whether the actions are right or wrong is the the big debate but I do think he's the only one with the balls to back his convictions.
For the record, I'm no fan of all SISU's actions but I think there's more to this than just black and white anti SISU or for SISU.
yes he did say it.He actually said that? I thought that was a forum gag.
I backed Thorn staying.
I'd have backed him staying longer this season then he did.
Stupidity to stick with him through the summer then sack so soon. Either show faith or get rid.
If a takeover of the club was to happen and someone else took the same action, then you can be certain that those against Fisher's actions would be behind them 100%.
Common sense, it is decisions like that, that give you a little insight into the thought processes that have led us to where we are today.
Knee jerk ill informed reactionary comments and decisions.
Common sense, it is decisions like that, that give you a little insight into the thought processes that have led us to where we are today.
Knee jerk ill informed reactionary comments and decisions.
Exactly. I also think that regardless of SISU still funding the club, there is a new board in place now and it's very different to the previous Onye Igwe, Lenny B, Kenny D, board of the past and people shouldn't tar the new board with their actions.
Did Bournemouth get promoted in the end?
I wonder who they will be dealing with, SISU or PHIV
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?