I have said for a good while it should be aimed directly at SISU.
Yes, people will disagree with things like NOPM as they see it damaging their club. I doubt anybody would take issue with somebody absolutely hammering SISU in their world which is finance (as long as we know it wont damage CCFC, somehow).
I think Tim Fisher is by the book CCFC / Otium isn't he rather than up there with Seppala and Deering?
Again it depends what you define as personal? Standing outside houses and families are a big no no for me, but damaging SISU in their world away from CCFC then yes.
Yes it shouldNo it shouldnt be personal
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Yes, definitely not outside houses etc but rather in the media. SISU/CCFC get talked about as the same thing but they aren't. Until Seppala, Coleman/SISU feel personally uncomfortable about media stories then I don't see anything changing.
No it shouldnt be personal
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
It has been from the council, one might argue...
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Coleman?
Ah. Thanksyeah, one of the blokes who runs SISU with Joy. Dermot.
Become personal? Are we back to shitbombs through letterboxes again, as per GMK a few years back?with the board of SISU.
NOPM, petitions and all that jazz really won't affect SISU at all. They are so far detached that they wouldn't really care.
The pressure should be put on Fisher, Seppala, Coleman personally to enact any sort of change. As long as they can escape without comment time and again nothing will change.
The Telegraph/national media should be going after them personally rather than petitions which they won't care about one bit. (Obviously unless the Telegraph know something we don't.)
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?