Broken Hearted Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
I have not implied anything you came out with the stupid statement that people could get his address and the company he part owns I said why would you want to .
I have not implied anything you came out with the stupid statement that people could get his address and the company he part owns I said why would you want to .I'm not sure where you get that silly implication from, I've not shared his address.
Let's be honest, there will be a certain element that won't be bothered about that.Looks to own a drainage company in Sheffield according to company house, don’t think that will be good for business!
In real life perhaps, but on Sky Blues Talk we can go back 20 years to prove rights and wrongs.
I did that too and you're obviously nicer than me as I was going to post it on here, but as you've not, I'll follow your lead.
He's a 21 year old director of a drainage business. I don't get the impression he's Richard Branson.That company might have employees and families that are dependent.
I need a job and proficient in Microsoft Office packages (at least according to my CV), I can teach them....which way is Sheffield, again?Lucky for him they haven't yet got spread sheets in Sheffield.
He's a 21 year old director of a drainage business. I don't get the impression he's Richard Branson.
Just so we're clear .... you're really criticising someone looking up his business whilst looking up in detail at his business for an Internet argument. Seek help immediately!So what? Even if he has 3 employees (which the company does according to CH having just checked), why would you bring those people into it? If I was punished every time I'd worked for a boss who was a twat, I'd be even more fucked than I am now.
So what? Even if he has 3 employees (which the company does according to CH having just checked), why would you bring those people into it? If I was punished every time I'd worked for a boss who was a twat, I'd be even more fucked than I am now.
He probably feels sorry for Sun journalists or traffic wardens.Who gives a shit, fingers crossed everyone boycotts them. Businesses with far more employees than them have been boycotted before. Hope he falls into a gutter.
Just so we're clear .... you're really criticising someone looking up his business whilst looking up in detail at his business for an Internet argument. Seek help immediately!
Edit: this is the guy btw who brought his racist views to Kasey's place of work, affecting a few more than three people, but you go on looking out for him
You're making assumptions that weren't said again to suit your weak argument. Quit whilst behind.I had no intention of looking up his business until it was being discussed how many employees he might have so I did a quick 30 second check. The criticism btw was the suggestion that people should go after his business to take it down. That's weird behaviour.
The guy fucked up. Complete arsehole. He has been publicly shamed and has been banned. You want more, you want to see him destroyed, regardless of the collateral damage to people around him? Put the pitchfork away.
Although I appreciate your point re going after his business I don’t think you can say ‘he fucked up’.I had no intention of looking up his business until it was being discussed how many employees he might have so I did a quick 30 second check. The criticism btw was the suggestion that people should go after his business to take it down. That's weird behaviour.
The guy fucked up. Complete arsehole. He has been publicly shamed and has been banned. You want more, you want to see him destroyed, regardless of the collateral damage to people around him? Put the pitchfork away.
I had no intention of looking up his business until it was being discussed how many employees he might have so I did a quick 30 second check. The criticism btw was the suggestion that people should go after his business to take it down. That's weird behaviour.
The guy fucked up. Complete arsehole. He has been publicly shamed and has been banned. You want more, you want to see him destroyed, regardless of the collateral damage to people around him? Put the pitchfork away.
Although I appreciate your point re going after his business I don’t think you can say ‘he fucked up’.
He stood in the stands and made monkey gestures to a person of colour. That isn’t a silly mistake that is pure ingrained racism and perhaps non-football fans should be aware of this prior to choosing to do business with him and his company?
So what? Even if he has 3 employees (which the company does according to CH having just checked), why would you bring those people into it? If I was punished every time I'd worked for a boss who was a twat, I'd be even more fucked than I am now.
It’s not actually his business. I wouldn’t be surprised if he doesn’t even work there
Claiming to know the precise details of Kasey Palmer's contract is one thing, but acting like you know the inner workings and management structure of a small drainage company in Sheffield might be a step too far.
He should’ve been made to wear his Sheff Wednesday top and watch every Sheff utd game from their end week in week out , now that’s punishment for the racist trampHe should have been given a season ticket and forced to watch that shit every week!
A lifetime ban from a football stadium isn’t exactly a draconian punishment imo.21 year old male does something incredibly stupid and gets a 5 year stadium ban and some community work which is good news , I don't think it's a crime that should be punished for life and I think he's being punished appropriately.
Not sure why people feel the urge to go further on the matter , bit weird tbh .
A lifetime ban from a football stadium isn’t exactly a draconian punishment imo.
Not often that I’m the one arguing for more hardline punishments, but maybe others just don’t think it’s as serious a problem. As it is, this guy will be back in the stands as if nothing ever happened in five years, and that’s assuming he doesn’t just rock up incognito as many people under banning orders are known to do.
Not always the case that this forum believes in the power of criminals to rehabilitate - apparently in this case, minds are very much open!We don't know he'll rock up as if nothing happened.
He may be a totally different person in 5 years time,
He may be even more of a dick, time will tell.
Not always the case that this forum believes in the power of criminals to rehabilitate - apparently in this case, minds are very much open!
Or seventy year olds in the opposite direction?There are 3 “employees” - 2 are him and his father. He was made a director at 18.
It’s set up so dividends are paid for tax advantages and share capital.
Plenty of parents make children directors for that purpose who are given fancy titles but in reality are utterly useless and a perpetual embarrassment.
Im sure some posters on here can relate to that - one way or another.
Not always the case that this forum believes in the power of criminals to rehabilitate - apparently in this case, minds are very much open!
He will have served a 5 year stadium ban , it's ample punishmentA lifetime ban from a football stadium isn’t exactly a draconian punishment imo.
Not often that I’m the one arguing for more hardline punishments, but maybe others just don’t think it’s as serious a problem. As it is, this guy will be back in the stands as if nothing ever happened in five years, and that’s assuming he doesn’t just rock up incognito as many people under banning orders are known to do.
I don’t see the contradiction here - I also think Edward Rabjohn has the right to live where he wants, however horrible a bloke he clearly is. Whereas the right to attend a football match at a particular stadium isn’t exactly a huge imposition on his rights, and will make our sport a better place by his absence.Well you previously said you would have no issue with rehabilitated sex offenders living next to you so perhaps look in the mirror for your own perspective.
I don’t see the contradiction here - I also think Edward Rabjohn has the right to live where he wants, however horrible a bloke he clearly is. Whereas the right to attend a football match at a particular stadium isn’t exactly a huge imposition on his rights, and will make our sport a better place by his absence.
Nah. No matter how drunk I would be at a football match or anywhere for that matter, I wouldn't be racist, because I'm not a racist.5 years is a hefty amount of time id say. Imagine he was drunk and is embarrassed. It may well never happen again. Sometimes got to give people a second chance to right wrongs in their life once exposed to themselves or others.
Looks to own a drainage company in Sheffield according to company house, don’t think that will be good for business!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?