skybluecam
Well-Known Member
Rushworth 7
MVE 5
Thomas 8
Kitching 7
Dasilva 7
Grimes 6
Torp 6
Eccles 5
BTA 7
Wright 7
Sakamoto 8
MVE 5
Thomas 8
Kitching 7
Dasilva 7
Grimes 6
Torp 6
Eccles 5
BTA 7
Wright 7
Sakamoto 8
And he didn't celebrate his goalThomas excellent. He looks like he could be turning into the real deal. Kitching also very good; one swivelled turn was utter filth.
Torp and Saka very good too.
Shout out to Sam McCallum too, who's a very good footballer, and he had a very good game, especially in the first half. Always liked him.
Met him a few times when he was with us as he was seeing a girl in Rugby and her parents used to drink in the same pub as us . He is a lovely lad , very grounded and no airs or graces about himAnd he didn't celebrate his goal
Emc 5?Three in three for Sakamoto who’s enjoying some terrific form.
Rushworth 7
MVE 6
Thomas 7
Kitching 7
Dasilva 6
Grimes 6
Eccles 5
Torp 6
Saka 8 MOTM
BTA 6
Wright 6
Subs
EMC 5 Criminally wasted possession too often
Allen N/A
MVE better than EMCThree in three for Sakamoto who’s enjoying some terrific form.
Rushworth 7
MVE 6
Thomas 7
Kitching 7
Dasilva 6
Grimes 6
Eccles 5
Torp 6
Saka 8 MOTM
BTA 6
Wright 6
Subs
EMC 5 Criminally wasted possession too often
Allen N/A
I’ve explained why. Too many poor decisions in the attacking third.Emc 5?
Fucking hell
He scared the shit out of them and turned the tide . Yeah some crosses were poor and that lass to write didn't execute but did far more good than bad.I’ve explained why. Too many poor decisions in the attacking third.
Fair, just not how I saw itHe scared the shit out of them and turned the tide . Yeah some crosses were poor and that lass to write didn't execute but did far more good than bad.
Sorry but that's plain ridiculousI’ve explained why. Too many poor decisions in the attacking third.
Torp was worse in the first half.I dint think Eccles was bad either.
Eccles getting unfair scores here. The sub was the right decision for the team but not because he was playing badly.
There’s deffo some confirmation bias with him. In fact the bloke behind me said “well played Torp” when it was Eccles… and “move it quicker Eccles” when it was Torp.
Meh, he used the ball too poorly to justify a higher rating in my opinion.Sorry but that's plain ridiculous
BTA wasn't working out wide eitherAgree. Eccles did OK but it wasn't working and the change was the right one
You need to watch the first 15-20 of the second half again , just him coming on and attacking their right back totally changed the game in our favourMeh, he used the ball too poorly to justify a higher rating in my opinion.
I was sat yards away from it, the change in shape and intensity turned the game around but I stand by what I said on his use of the ball.You need to watch the first 15-20 of the second half again , just him coming on and attacking their right back totally changed the game in our favour
Rushworth 7
MVE 5
Thomas 8
Kitching 7
Dasilva 7
Grimes 6
Torp 6
Eccles 5
BTA 7
Wright 7
Sakamoto 8
So him coming on changed the intensity and got us looking like a real threat but cause he made a couple of bad choices he's only a 5?I was sat yards away from it, the change in shape and intensity turned the game around but I stand by what I said on his use of the ball.
I’m happy to hear the arguments against what I’ve written, I’ve no axe to grind against the player. For me poor use of the ball was a huge problem throughout the team and throughout the game aside from that 15 minutes after half time.So him coming on changed the intensity and got us looking like a real threat but cause he made a couple of bad choices he's only a 5?
Fair enough , You're usually a very fair poster but I think you're well wide of the mark on this occasion
He's not a 10/attacking mid so I assume the idea behind playing him there is to use his energy for pressing and give us more presence in midfield compared to when BTA is there. For me he just didn't impact the game enough, played slightly too high and seemed to be lacking some fitness.Eccles getting unfair scores here. The sub was the right decision for the team but not because he was playing badly.
There’s deffo some confirmation bias with him. In fact the bloke behind me said “well played Torp” when it was Eccles… and “move it quicker Eccles” when it was Torp.
He's not a 10/attacking mid so I assume the idea behind playing him there is to use his energy for pressing and give us more presence in midfield compared to when BTA is there. For me he just didn't impact the game enough, played slightly too high and seemed to be lacking some fitness.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?