Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Scumberland or Shitefield ? (8 Viewers)

  • Thread starter Covcraig@bury
  • Start date May 19, 2025
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
Next
First Prev 26 of 28 Next Last

Sky Blue Pete

Well-Known Member
  • Sunday at 11:27 AM
  • #876
Saddlebrains said:
'We were the better team over 2 legs' doesnt ring true for me

We had loads of the ball yes. But did fuck all with it

I know people on here struggle to face reality, but Sunderland did a job on us and executed it perfectly. Yes they got lucky with a 132 minute winner, but we didnt do enough
Click to expand...
I’m just saying what neutral friends said
 

Shannerz

Well-Known Member
  • Sunday at 11:28 AM
  • #877
Sky Blue Pete said:
First leg they were the better team - no chance
Click to expand...
But they were. The only time we even looked like breaking through was immediately after they scored.

We've no answer to those tactics. It's something that has to be worked on in the summer.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Sunday at 11:38 AM
  • #878
Saddlebrains said:
'We were the better team over 2 legs' doesnt ring true for me

We had loads of the ball yes. But did fuck all with it

I know people on here struggle to face reality, but Sunderland did a job on us and executed it perfectly. Yes they got lucky with a 132 minute winner, but we didnt do enough
Click to expand...

If we'd got out of this league the way they have I'd be delighted and I'd dismiss any criticism of the way we played as sour grapes.
 
Reactions: AOM, Super Frank, Sick Boy and 3 others

Tealeaf

Active Member
  • Sunday at 11:54 AM
  • #879
Good luck to Sunderland, There efforts paid off for them.
Big club - Big fan base.
 

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
  • Sunday at 11:54 AM
  • #880
Sky Blue Pete said:
I’m just saying what neutral friends said
Click to expand...


Im not having a dig Pete, I just think its a phalacy overall with football. People see us have lots of the ball and say 'ooo better team'when in reality we just pissed about sideways and back
 
Reactions: chickentikkamasala, Para1140, HuckerbyDublinWhelan and 1 other person
C

Cally Fedora

Well-Known Member
  • Sunday at 12:57 PM
  • #881
torchomatic said:
Nonsense. As far as I'm concerned very team that gets promoted deserves to get promoted.

Who cares how? Combination of skill and luck. We wouldn't be complaining if we'd done the same as them.

Staying up there will be a hell of a challenge, but good luck to them.
Click to expand...
OK. We drew up there in the league. We beat them easily at home. For me we battered them in the second leg and made a huge mistake in the first. They will 100% be relegated and they will do it playing a style of football as entertaining as piles.
 
Reactions: Para1140

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Sunday at 1:10 PM
  • #882
Saddlebrains said:
Im not having a dig Pete, I just think its a phalacy overall with football. People see us have lots of the ball and say 'ooo better team'when in reality we just pissed about sideways and back
Click to expand...

That was the story of the 2 legs. What it has showed is our inability to be creative and clinical around the box. Needs to be addressed.
 
Reactions: Para1140, Saddlebrains and OffenhamSkyBlue

Tommo1993

Well-Known Member
  • Sunday at 1:17 PM
  • #883
Not sure why people are so caught up on how Sunderland did it. If a £1m cheque turned up at your door, would you turn it away so it could go to someone who did better than you over a longer period of time but fucked up at the end, or just take it?

We had a lot of the ball but did fuck all with it. Slice of good fortune got them past us, but imo the better team won the final.
 
Last edited: Sunday at 1:25 PM
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Sunday at 1:20 PM
  • #884
quinn1971 said:
Looked like the slowest shot ever, but bang in the corner, looked brilliant
Click to expand...
GK suspect for me.
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Sunday at 1:21 PM
  • #885
On reflection they deserved it. The way they played suited knockout football. They kept it tight at the back and took their chances when they got them
 
Reactions: Moff and Saddlebrains

Major Tom

Well-Known Member
  • Sunday at 2:28 PM
  • #886
They started well, kept themselves in the playoffs with a young squad and then rode their luck or were master tacticians depending how you luck at the play offs.

Shows what can be done in the championship lottery and we just need to make sure we are in the playoffs again next season to give ourselves a chance of promotion.
 
Reactions: torchomatic and wingy
W

wingy

Well-Known Member
  • Sunday at 2:34 PM
  • #887
Major Tom said:
They started well, kept themselves in the playoffs with a young squad and then rode their luck or were master tacticians depending how you luck at the play offs.

Shows what can be done in the championship lottery and we just need to make sure we are in the playoffs again next season to give ourselves a chance of promotion.
Click to expand...
Especially the young bit, I expect it to serve them well next season.
 
O

OffenhamSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
  • Sunday at 3:43 PM
  • #888
clint van damme said:
But saying top 6 is the minimum suggest that realistically we should do more.
And closing a 31 point gap on the parachute payment teams isn't realistic in my opinion, not for Lampard, not for Robins, not for anyone managing City.
Click to expand...
Caveat to that ... unless we get a billionaire or Middle East state to buy us to the Prem, and frankly, i would rather not see that. I don't like it in other teams, so why should i want it for us. I would rather see us be competitive year after year in the Champ than see us getting spanked week in, week out, in the Prem in front of a half-empty CBS.
 
Reactions: Para1140
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Sunday at 4:09 PM
  • #889
OffenhamSkyBlue said:
Caveat to that ... unless we get a billionaire or Middle East state to buy us to the Prem, and frankly, i would rather not see that. I don't like it in other teams, so why should i want it for us. I would rather see us be competitive year after year in the Champ than see us getting spanked week in, week out, in the Prem in front of a half-empty CBS.
Click to expand...
But that just limits us to also rans at best that lose at Wembley every so often.

Why would you put a ceiling on us? Being a yo yo club is infinitely more appealing than being a Millwall or Preston… which is what you’re advocating
 
N

napolimp

Well-Known Member
  • Sunday at 4:53 PM
  • #890
Sick Boy said:
Reaching POs was hardly the minimum expected of FL this season…what else was he supposed to achieve?
Click to expand...

He was supposed to be promoted by new years, so we could have half a season getting used to the Premier League before the full 25/26 season. Minimum for the 25/26 season was securing a champions league spot, but realistically we should be winning the title.
 

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
  • Sunday at 5:17 PM
  • #891
The Strawberry Pub in Newcastle shared this earlier
 
Reactions: SkyBlueSam01

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Sunday at 5:37 PM
  • #892
Saddlebrains said:
Im not having a dig Pete, I just think its a phalacy overall with football. People see us have lots of the ball and say 'ooo better team'when in reality we just pissed about sideways and back
Click to expand...
Fallacy
 

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
  • Sunday at 5:41 PM
  • #893
fernandopartridge said:
Fallacy
Click to expand...
Preferred the way Saddlebrains spelled it tbh…
 
Reactions: StrettoBoy and OffenhamSkyBlue

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member
  • Sunday at 5:47 PM
  • #894
Jamesimus said:
Preferred the way Saddlebrains spelled it tbh…
Click to expand...
You like cock, say it elsewhere please
 
Reactions: Skybluekyle, Saddlebrains and Jamesimus

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Sunday at 7:58 PM
  • #895
clint van damme said:
If we'd got out of this league the way they have I'd be delighted and I'd dismiss any criticism of the way we played as sour grapes.
Click to expand...
It’s why winning football is always better than the style, despite what some would have you believe.
 
C

CovveeBreak

Well-Known Member
  • Sunday at 8:03 PM
  • #896
I'm already bored of every football social account pretending like Sunderland being back in the Prem is like they got relegated to non-league and back all whilst fielding nothing but a team if infants and having a local chip shop owner running the club.

You've been away for 8 years for christ sake - only to league one - and had a takeover by a young billionaire
 
Reactions: Para1140 and shmmeee

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Sunday at 8:03 PM
  • #897
Sick Boy said:
It’s why winning football is always better than the style, despite what some would have you believe.
Click to expand...

I agree, though that opens up a whole new can of worms because you have to ask why we binned off the formation that gave us our most successful spell of the season
 
Reactions: wingy and blunted

blunted

Well-Known Member
  • Sunday at 10:23 PM
  • #898
clint van damme said:
I agree, though that opens up a whole new can of worms because you have to ask why we binned off the formation that gave us our most successful spell of the season
Click to expand...
I was about to say the same. Mid-season we looked like we would win every match. Leeds showed us up.
I get it, Lampard wants to win with style, but we were brilliant during that run, particularly away from home.
Think we need to be more flexible next year especially away.
 
Reactions: Gynnsthetonic

shepardo01

Well-Known Member
  • Sunday at 11:54 PM
  • #899
blunted said:
I was about to say the same. Mid-season we looked like we would win every match. Leeds showed us up.
I get it, Lampard wants to win with style, but we were brilliant during that run, particularly away from home.
Think we need to be more flexible next year especially away.
Click to expand...
We were far from brilliant!
We were a bit lucky, scrapped results with a fair few last minute goals, mostly playing a defensive formation!

How many games did you come away from thinking, yeah - good performance that!?!

Results were brilliant - performances not so.

Hence my thread - are we going to "shit" our way up?
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Monday at 8:53 AM
  • #900
shepardo01 said:
We were far from brilliant!
We were a bit lucky, scrapped results with a fair few last minute goals, mostly playing a defensive formation!

How many games did you come away from thinking, yeah - good performance that!?!

Results were brilliant - performances not so.

Hence my thread - are we going to "shit" our way up?
Click to expand...

Genuinely think we’ve had maybe three decent performances under Lampard. Results have been great but we haven’t actually played that well. It’s what worries me about next season. Can you do that for a full season? Without the ten game purple patch we’d have been solidly mid table.
 
Reactions: shepardo01

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • Monday at 9:32 AM
  • #901
shmmeee said:
Genuinely think we’ve had maybe three decent performances under Lampard. Results have been great but we haven’t actually played that well. It’s what worries me about next season. Can you do that for a full season? Without the ten game purple patch we’d have been solidly mid table.
Click to expand...
I think that's unfair

Middlesbrough
West Brom
Sunderland
Preston
Watford
Plymouth

Were all very good performances and more than 'decent' in my view.

Decent performance where we weren't spectacular but still the better team or in the case of Oxford obviously the better team but sloppy mistakes.

Portsmouth
QPR
Blackburn
Swansea
Bristol
Millwall
Hull
Oxford

And Burnley was also a decent performance sabotaged by Collins.

Feel it's a bit disingenuous to say we've only had three decent performances, not sure what your view on decent is but it sounds like you think we've played alright for three matches and was shit for the rest.

Yes not always free flowing football but there's always another team on the pitch trying to disrupt and stop you from playing.

From all our wins it would only be the Sheffield Wednesday and Stoke match where you would say we got away with it and didn't deserve the result in my view. Pretty much all our other wins we deserved or would say we just about edged it performance wise in a tight game.

There was some other shit performances along the way but generally we got deserved from those matches when we were poor.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Monday at 9:38 AM
  • #902
SkyBlue_Bear83 said:
I think that's unfair

Middlesbrough
West Brom
Sunderland
Preston
Watford
Plymouth

Were all very good performances and more than 'decent' in my view.

Decent performance where we weren't spectacular but still the better team or in the case of Oxford obviously the better team but sloppy mistakes.

Portsmouth
QPR
Blackburn
Swansea
Bristol
Millwall
Hull
Oxford

And Burnley was also a decent performance sabotaged by Collins.

Feel it's a bit disingenuous to say we've only had three decent performances, not sure what your view on decent is but it sounds like you think we've played alright for three matches and was shit for the rest.

Yes not always free flowing football but there's always another team on the pitch trying to disrupt and stop you from playing.

From all our wins it would only be the Sheffield Wednesday and Stoke match where you would say we got away with it and didn't deserve the result in my view. Pretty much all our other wins we deserved or would say we just about edged it performance wise in a tight game.

There was some other shit performances along the way but generally we got deserved from those matches when we were poor.
Click to expand...

Would argue with you over Plymouth Sunderland Middlesbrough but it’s still 6 out of what 31 games? And I’d argue whether we played well for 90 minutes in most of those games.

I’m not saying we didn’t deserve to win or whatever. Just we didn’t see a performance like first half at Watford where you thought “yeah this is this team playing how they want to the level they want”.
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
  • Monday at 9:59 AM
  • #903
shmmeee said:
Would argue with you over Plymouth Sunderland Middlesbrough but it’s still 6 out of what 31 games? And I’d argue whether we played well for 90 minutes in most of those games.

I’m not saying we didn’t deserve to win or whatever. Just we didn’t see a performance like first half at Watford where you thought “yeah this is this team playing how they want to the level they want”.
Click to expand...
There's always another team trying to stop you from playing the way you want and we know it's relatively fine margins separating a team chasing play offs to one struggling in the lower half. We're not good enough to regularly blow teams away for 90 minutes, we don't have the players to do it. Only Leeds did that this year in this league.

I think if you look at the results you can't genuinely argue with many of them that the result wasn't a fair reflection of the game.
 

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Monday at 10:06 AM
  • #904
SkyBlue_Bear83 said:
There's always another team trying to stop you from playing the way you want and we know it's relatively fine margins separating a team chasing play offs to one struggling in the lower half. We're not good enough to regularly blow teams away for 90 minutes, we don't have the players to do it. Only Leeds did that this year in this league.

I think if you look at the results you can't genuinely argue with many of them that the result wasn't a fair reflection of the game.
Click to expand...

I think other teams have played well more often. I don’t think anyone is saying we need to blow teams away, most of the games I’m citing as decent performances we won by a single goal I think. Just a consistent pattern of play where it looks like we know what we’re doing.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Monday at 10:26 AM
  • #905
AFCCOVENTRY said:
That was the story of the 2 legs. What it has showed is our inability to be creative and clinical around the box. Needs to be addressed.
Click to expand...
Not sure that is entirely true. Some degree of truth in it for sure, but I think it was as much to do with Simms and Wright both being badly out of form at the end of the season
 
H

HuckerbyDublinWhelan

Well-Known Member
  • Monday at 10:32 AM
  • #906
shmmeee said:
I think other teams have played well more often. I don’t think anyone is saying we need to blow teams away, most of the games I’m citing as decent performances we won by a single goal I think. Just a consistent pattern of play where it looks like we know what we’re doing.
Click to expand...
My concern is we have no plan b to counter a defensive way of playing. We’re good when the other side wants to give us space.

this was woefully shown up against Luton, Portsmouth at home, Derby and the Play offs. Teams that thought they could go toe to toe with us were generally blown away. Sunderland, West Brom and Middlesbrough.

Unless we scored early we were bogged down by the “lesser” teams
 
Reactions: Sky_Blue_Dreamer, Saddlebrains and clint van damme

Sbarcher

Well-Known Member
  • Monday at 10:36 AM
  • #907
By my reckoning we won 20 league games this season. 13 were by a single goal. For me, that’s not dominating games. But we have managed to game manage well.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Monday at 10:41 AM
  • #908
HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
My concern is we have no plan b to counter a defensive way of playing. We’re good when the other side wants to give us space.

this was woefully shown up against Luton, Portsmouth at home, Derby and the Play offs. Teams that thought they could go toe to toe with us were generally blown away. Sunderland, West Brom and Middlesbrough.

Unless we scored early we were bogged down by the “lesser” teams
Click to expand...

I agree, though I would caveat that by saying that the summer recruitment may well be aimed at finding a solution.
 
C

Cally Fedora

Well-Known Member
  • Monday at 10:57 AM
  • #909
We’re so eager to do ourselves down. “When we won we still didn’t play well”, “other teams played better”. It’s total nonsense. Apart from a stand out like Leeds you’ll rarely see a walk over in the championship. You’ve got to get wins. But you can certainly do it without being Sunderland esque. We played some really good stuff and won games - which proves it.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Goblin, ajsccfc, SkyBlue_Bear83 and 2 others

shepardo01

Well-Known Member
  • Monday at 12:39 PM
  • #910
shmmeee said:
Genuinely think we’ve had maybe three decent performances under Lampard. Results have been great but we haven’t actually played that well. It’s what worries me about next season. Can you do that for a full season? Without the ten game purple patch we’d have been solidly mid table.
Click to expand...
There were also 3/4 games I think where the opposition had players sent off!
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
Next
First Prev 26 of 28 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

  • Mcbean6 minutes ago
Total: 9 (members: 1, guests: 8)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?