It's happening all over isn't it? Making toilets unisex in schools.Why on earth are they unisex in a school?
I'd bet he just gets a few days internal suspensionWe have them in our school - but unisex is maybe the wrong description. They are floor to ceiling cubicles in an open plan area with sinks so any kids can use any one. The rationale is to reduce bullying and kids with contraband.
The disgusting shitbag involved should be permanently excluded, for both the assault and the intent to take a picture of someone in a cubicle.
Sadly I reckon you’ll be correct.I'd bet he just gets a few days internal suspension
The school aren’t dealing with the issues of cubicles being damaged and providing a safe and fit for purpose environment for students.
Any kids booting doors and damaging locks need to be severely sanctioned and made an example of.
It's in the same bracket as 'upskirting' which is a real problem in my school. Not seen anyone permanently excluded for it yet.I'd imagine taking photos of people in the toilets is in effect some sort of sex crime, not something a kid wants following them around for the rest of their life but putting them in this situation and expecting them to act responsibly is a tall order.
It says the cubicles are floor to ceiling so it goes beyond the idea of ‘acting responsibly’ - any attempt to go in is pre-meditated.I'd imagine taking photos of people in the toilets is in effect some sort of sex crime, not something a kid wants following them around for the rest of their life but putting them in this situation and expecting them to act responsibly is a tall order.
The honest truth is that they will most likely not be permanently excluded. For reasons such as it costing the school money to exclude, or triggering an Ofsted inspection, or some other reason which should matter far less than making an example of a literal sex offender.This must immensely traumatic for the girl in question and no-one should be put through something like that.
On the whole I've suggested individual cubicles as a solution to the safety vs identity dilemma but I was mainly considering it in adult spaces rather than schools.
With schools I can definitely see the argument for separate given the immaturity etc. of those involved. On the other the sooner they become accustomed to it the sooner it would seem a normal arrangement and respect shown. I'm sure the vast majority of kids are respectful of everyone and their privacy but a few dickheads won't. But the same could be said of adults. I'd say I know a fair few kids who would seem to be more mature than a number of adults.
I think the kid involved should most definitely be treated as a example including being regarded as a sex offender, both to hopefully change his behaviour in future and act as a warning/deterrent to others.
So on the whole I'd say I'm not against the schools having individual cubicles that are unisex. However, aligned with it must be education that these spaces are private for those using them and showing the huge punishment that comes with not respecting that. And, most importantly, enforcing them to their full extent should an incidence arise.
As much as this incident sickens me, my biggest fear is that the perpetrator won't be dealt with in the harshest possible terms. If they're just given a smacked wrist then it could lead to more in future.
I want to give this both a like and sad reaction.The honest truth is that they will most likely not be permanently excluded. For reasons such as it costing the school money to exclude, or triggering an Ofsted inspection, or some other reason which should matter far less than making an example of a literal sex offender.
I want to give this both a like and sad reaction.
Why do people and organisations never look to the long term? They'd be afraid of the inspection, money etc if they exclude the student, but how bad would the inspection etc be if being lenient led to another incident? Or two? or three?
You nip bad behaviour in the bud, regardless of how inconvenient it is, otherwise you'll be dealing with it more and more later on.
Sadly I think you're right. If you want something done about it you have to make sure it gets aired outside of the school hierarchy, who will attempt to hush it up if at all possible.I think the extra negative publicity in this particular case will produce a stronger punishment. I would say in each year of teaching I have reported racist behaviour and comments, all the way up to just calling people the n-word in lessons. On no occasion has the offender been excluded and in fact only once were they suspended.
But I have still had colleagues lose their jobs over getting nationalities wrong. Why? Because excluding a student costs money, but forcing out an experienced teacher saves it.
It's in the same bracket as 'upskirting' which is a real problem in my school. Not seen anyone permanently excluded for it yet.
What's wrong with unisex toilets?
Increases risks for women.
There's your problem right there. As a society, we seem to accept that the symptoms of male misogynist behaviour should be treated, rather than the cause.
There is an interesting point here, if as a school you move to a model of cubicles with open plan sinks etc then you should also be including in that a plan to ‘police’ them as you have said. Whether that means appropriate use of CCTV or by regular staff monitoring (or more likely a combination of the two)Increases risk for women, also reduces toilet space as everything needs to be cubicles which often means you get men’s and unisex, in schools in particular toilets are not policed well enough to account for teenage boys.
There is an interesting point here, if as a school you move to a model of cubicles with open plan sinks etc then you should also be including in that a plan to ‘police’ them as you have said. Whether that means appropriate use of CCTV or by regular staff monitoring (or more likely a combination of the two)
The little scrote should be excluded, however the school in question should take some responsibility, it mentioned that all the locks had been broken on the doors in above incident, been kicked in, and reported several times, where's the good old caretaker in this situation, another post probably that went the way of cuts
Interesting point. My wife works in a school and says they have 2 caretaker vacancies out of 4 positions, both have been advertised widely for over a year and no one wants the job. There's a real shortage of workers in this country right now, and I think a lot of people don't realise it.
It's going to reach crisis point, they're going to have to either get people out of retirement, or bring younger people into the country who are willing to do lower paid jobs.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?