We can get better than Sam gallagher especially if the money quoted is even remotely serious (which I doubt )Why is he ‘pretty wank?’
I can’t see Godden being a starter after our transfer business is complete. He hit some really good form in our second Championship season but either side of that was struggle with injuries or form.
Piroe would cost about 5 million less than vikMissed the first 20 minutes of yesterdays game so difficult to come to any conclusions but it looks to me getting the right partner for Simms is essential, will be linked to a few and we may have someone in the frame, will cost, fee and wages don’t know about Gallagher so can’t comment but of those I have seen last season someone like Archer would be okay but for me I’d like Joel Piroe who seems to be available, ticks the box and 41 goals in 88 games not to be sneered at, is being strongly linked to the other side of the M69 too, would be a bit of a coup to pinch him from under their nose.
All good things must come to an end. You got it on good authority?
We can get better than Sam gallagher especially if the money quoted is even remotely serious (which I doubt )
Be far cheaper to keep godden in the squad than to pay 5 million for a player who scores less .
I'd be OK with it if he assisted lots but he assists less than godden too
Jesus christIt’s only a small difference, but Godden takes our penalties and his ratio isn’t as strong when you factor that into his record. Gallagher as far as I can see isn’t a penalty taker.
How much is the quote for Gallagher? If it’s more than £2.5m, I’d be very surprised we were not more aggressive in getting a player like Yates from Blackpool.
I don't see Godden leaving, Robins rates him highly, but I can see him being third choice rather than second.
Jesus christ
Godden goal every 268 minutes without penalties in the championshipIf Godden had longer on his contract, he definitely stays to fulfill that role. If we can get £500-750k (or more somehow), it’s a move potentially in all parties favours:
- we get a money for a player who’ll be 32 upon expiry of contract
- Godden gets a relatively big contract for a potential ‘final’ big pay day
- a team gets a good finisher
If we sign more players, in my mind, Godden falls down the pecking order. Less game, he may end up not signing an extension or lost some value.
I've just replied to youGodden’s record without penalties last season was 1 in 5.75 games which is worst than a player you called ‘pretty wank’ (1 in 4.25 games).
He’s got 3 of our transfers thus window so far …Relax guys, it's come from Alan Nixon, aka the king of bullshit rumours. When are you going to learn?
So weird how people keep putting him down as clueless. Why randomly hate the person lolHe’s got 3 of our transfers thus window so far …
Joel
Collins
Da Silva
It’s a 2 way thing …. Does Godden want to stay to be a sub ? Is his agent saying to him he can get him another lucrative move ( signing on fee etc ) this summer ?I don't see Godden leaving, Robins rates him highly, but I can see him being third choice rather than second.
He's scored past us twice in last two seasons and yet both times I've thought clumsy is the word
Missed the first 20 minutes of yesterdays game so difficult to come to any conclusions but it looks to me getting the right partner for Simms is essential, will be linked to a few and we may have someone in the frame, will cost, fee and wages don’t know about Gallagher so can’t comment but of those I have seen last season someone like Archer would be okay but for me I’d like Joel Piroe who seems to be available, ticks the box and 41 goals in 88 games not to be sneered at, is being strongly linked to the other side of the M69 too, would be a bit of a coup to pinch him from under their nose.
Why so arsey? Someone has woke up in a bad mood.I've just replied to you , delete your nonsense
I'm arsey about the thought of paying 5 million for Sam fucking gallagher when we already have better .. I never wrote the articleWhy so arsey? Someone has woke up in a bad mood.
If Championship teams like QPR, Ipswich or a L1 contender like Derby have genuine interest in him… you need to account for the possibility Godden may not want to be a squad player in his contract year. Especially if you’re going to be rude in your responses.
If I was Godden, I’d be very open to the possibility of moving on if he’s going to be a 3rd or 4th choice this season.
I'm arsey about the thought of paying 5 million for Sam fucking gallagher when we already have better .. I never wrote the article
Godden being 3rd or 4th choice is fine , we need better than gallagher though
Then we won’t be buying him then and I doubt anyone’s else will be either. So will be out of contract next year.Swansea would want at least £15m for him
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And Robins said in his post-match, “what we need now is pace”. So I can’t see it being Gallagher.
Adam Armstrong?! Sorry, totally wishful thinking there!
Coventry City and Stoke City keen on Blackburn Rovers striker News: The72 - Football League News
Coventry City and Stoke City are keen on signing Blackburn Rovers striker Sam Gallagher, reports Alan Nixon.the72.co.uk
Can’t see this happening to be honest but if it was a cheap squad option then fine. Will be 28 years old in September and hardly prolific.
If Godden doesn't score he offers absolutely nothing but that's applies to some strikers I guess. At all levelsMATTY GODDEN DOES NOT STRUGGLE IN THE CHAMPIONSHIP (LOUDER FOR THE PEOPLE AT THE BACK)
26 goal involvements in 57 games is not a struggle (last 2 seasons)
thanks for coming to my ted talk
Yeah I've always thought he's looked a handfulI’ve actually always been really impressed with him whenever he’s played against us to be honest
He absolutely bullied us at Ewood Park in the first half last seasonYeah I've always thought he's looked a handful
Sharp and Gallagher will be our strike force if you want to believe Alan Nixon.He’s got 3 of our transfers thus window so far …
Joel
Collins
Da Silva
As Blackburn need to sell, I could see a scenario whereby the price drops, but can’t see him signing for us on less money than he’s earning now.Anyway it's a nothing article as it seems to say we'd be interested if he cost less and earned less!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?