For context Cov beat a league one side, a relegation candidate championship side and a non league side in the run up to the QF. It's all relative and meaninglessFor context, PSV’s cup run that season saw them beat a second division side in the QFs and a third division side in the semis. They beat Ajax in the final on penalties.
Certainly not from meI’d take Dean Smith 2bh. I fell like his name hasn’t been looked at due to the more favourable names as it were coming out in the media and bookies.
That's a speculative rag at bestAccording to the METRO Burnley are interested in RVN.
Part of Daily Mail group.That's a speculative rag at best
Says it all .....Part of Daily Mail group.
Infact the “novice” RVN has managed more games than Skubala
Has the club confirmed who has actually applied?Looking at the calibre of coaches applying for the role, perhaps sacking Robins wasn’t the crazy decision many of us thought it would’ve been?
Has the club confirmed who has actually applied?
Has the club confirmed who has actually applied?
Who?Mark Robins did OK
Then someone saying "Looking at the calibre of coaches applying for the role, perhaps sacking Robins wasn't the crazy decision many of us thought it would've been?" is just shit-stirring.Wouldn't of thought so, things like that would be kept confidential until it was a done deal.
Well if you want to run the Club Professionally that is.
Then someone saying "Looking at the calibre of coaches applying for the role, perhaps sacking Robins wasn't the crazy decision many of us thought it would've been?" is just shit-stirring.
Then someone saying "Looking at the calibre of coaches applying for the role, perhaps sacking Robins wasn't the crazy decision many of us thought it would've been?" is just shit-stirring.
Hardly. It seems the premise is incorrect.Talk about being dramatic
I think when Parker was appointed it was basically between him and RVN. The opportunity at United came up for RVN so that sort of made Burnley's decision.According to the METRO Burnley are interested in RVN.
How is it relative?For context Cov beat a league one side, a relegation candidate championship side and a non league side in the run up to the QF. It's all relative and meaningless
Football is often poeticAs my mate said, an ex Utd No10 replaced by a younger ex Utd No10
You were making the point that PSV beat weak opposition in their cup run and as such the implication was that it meant less. In that respect there are strong comparisons with Covs Cup run last season which was dissed by nobody on here.How is it relative?
The strength of the opposition is absolutely relevant when it comes to assessing how much credit a manager should get for a cup run.
I obviously thought the cup run was lovely but it was a pretty crap reason to keep Robins in a job.You were making the point that PSV beat weak opposition in their cup run and as such the implication was that it meant less. In that respect there are strong comparisons with Covs Cup run last season which was dissed by nobody on here.
I certainly agree with thatI obviously thought the cup run was lovely but it was a pretty crap reason to keep Robins in a job.
Was that after Dublin was sold?Let’s be honest, all things considered, from a personal perspective - I’d prefer Van Nistelrooy over Lampard, at least.
Then we can finally say he came to Cov, 28 years after we were basically offered him for £250k, and Strachan said no.
It was 1997 if I remember rightly, so 27 years-ish. Before we threw £3 million at Grasshoppers for Moldovan.Was that after Dublin was sold?
Just for context, Wayne Rooney was also Utd No 10As my mate said, an ex Utd No10 replaced by a younger ex Utd No10
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?