Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Russell Brand (2 Viewers)

  • Thread starter napolimp
  • Start date Sep 17, 2023
Forums New posts
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 7
Next
1 of 7 Next Last
N

napolimp

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #1
Becoming a bit bored of this "getting cancelled, I didn't do anything wrong" defence when celebrities get accused of serious crimes now.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #2
napolimp said:
Becoming a bit bored of this "getting cancelled, I didn't do anything wrong" defence when celebrities get accused of serious crimes now.
Click to expand...

Well some didn’t to be fair
 

Alan Dugdales Moustache

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #3
A nasty, attention seeking , manipulative, arrogant bastard. Always hated him. I hope he gets 20 years and gets regularly serviced in prison.
 

Covkid1968#

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #4
Alan Dugdales Moustache said:
A nasty, attention seeking , manipulative, arrogant bastard. Always hated him. I hope he gets 20 years and gets regularly serviced in prison.
Click to expand...
The Juries still out for you on this I see I actually agree with much of this. Never really liked him … but I do hope he gets a fair hearing and chance to defend himself.
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #5
It’s safe to say I was never a fan of Mr Brand

Election 2015

In a democracy, a demonstration is a right, however it would be very dangerous for any government of the day to take any notice of it. Would you like to see laws enacted off the back of a Sharia Law for Uk or an EDL march? What? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/cele...side-bank.html Classy...
www.skybluestalk.co.uk
 
N

napolimp

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #6
Grendel said:
It’s safe to say I was never a fan of Mr Brand

Election 2015

In a democracy, a demonstration is a right, however it would be very dangerous for any government of the day to take any notice of it. Would you like to see laws enacted off the back of a Sharia Law for Uk or an EDL march? What? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/cele...side-bank.html Classy...
www.skybluestalk.co.uk
Click to expand...

He always thought he was "edgy".
 

Finham

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #7
I'm just glad to know what Katherine Ryan was banging on about! I wasn't paying much attention, but "both his names are things you do to cattle" now seems very obvious.

Fern Brady too with her "a little rapey wape" thing.

Also interesting to see some of the conspiracy theories, my favourite being "it's a plot by Obama". Of course!
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #8
Finham said:
I'm just glad to know what Katherine Ryan was banging on about! I wasn't paying much attention, but "both his names are things you do to cattle" now seems very obvious.

Fern Brady too with her "a little rapey wape" thing.

Also interesting to see some of the conspiracy theories, my favourite being "it's a plot by Obama". Of course!
Click to expand...

It's to distract from the introduction of the 20mph speed limit in Wales was some take on it.
 
Reactions: Skyblueweeman, stupot07, duffer and 4 others

Finham

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #9
clint van damme said:
It's to distract from the introduction of the 20mph speed limit in Wales was some take on it.
Click to expand...
Is social media making people stoopider, or have they always been like this but didn't have a platform?
 
Reactions: duffer
N

napolimp

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #10
clint van damme said:
It's to distract from the introduction of the 20mph speed limit in Wales was some take on it.
Click to expand...

Local ministers have already basically said that the point of it is to get vehicle speeds under 30mph - which is an absolutely fair urban speed most people don't manage to abide by.
 
Reactions: stupot07 and Terry_dactyl

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #11
I mean , obviously there's going to be a trial and everything yes ?
 
Reactions: Ian1779

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #12
Finham said:
Is social media making people stoopider, or have they always been like this but didn't have a platform?
Click to expand...

I think there's a whole raft of reasons though stupidity is definitely a factor.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #13
Evo1883 said:
I mean , obviously there's going to be a trial and everything yes ?
Click to expand...

If not, given his wealth, you'd expect him to sue the makers of the documentary.
 

Finham

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #14
clint van damme said:
If not, given his wealth, you'd expect him to sue the makers of the documentary.
Click to expand...
"And I am going to sue you for these lies" were the missing words of his lengthy rant online-which rather suggests that he can't because he would lose. Not sure 4 and the Times would have gone with this so hard unless they thought they were on solid ground?

Will action be taken against him, though? I suppose they are hoping that the programme will prompt more people to come forwards? As things stand there are no charges, just things like a BBC investigation.
 
Reactions: duffer and shmmeee

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #15
clint van damme said:
If not, given his wealth, you'd expect him to sue the makers of the documentary.
Click to expand...
The metropolitan police have said they've not received any reports based on the allegations against Russell Brand ? Bit weird

Edit : just seen they've asked for information from any women who want to come forward .
 
Last edited: Sep 17, 2023

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #16
I like the part in his video where he complained that people refer to him as a conspiracy theorist just before he talks about the big conspiracy against him.
 
Reactions: duffer, shmmeee and Otis
C

CCFCSteve

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #17
Evo1883 said:
The metropolitan police have said they've not received any reports based on the allegations against Russell Brand ? Bit weird

Edit : just seen they've asked for information from any women who want to come forward .
Click to expand...

I presume It’s because the main serious allegations from the programme were relating to incidents in the USA.

Would be surprised if there aren’t more to come though
 

ajsccfc

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #18
Would it require the women to make their identity public? If so I could see him avoiding charges. The rabid cult fanbase he's cultivated combined with those of some of the people who've backed him already would have no issue threatening people, all these incel matrix lunatics.
 
C

croatskyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #19
I happen, unfortunately, to know quite a bit about false allegations. It’s the most traumatic thing that can ever happen to you. Not me, but someone I’m very close to.

Any one person can walk in off the street and accuse you of something terrible and your life is changed forever.

However, this is not one person, this is five people who didn’t know each other beforehand. And unless they all concocted fake text messages to make him look like a slimeball, and duped Chanel 4 and The Times plus their legal teams, this seems pretty serious. I can’t see any way he doesn’t end up on trial, because if these women don’t make a formal complaint and I’m Russell Brand, I’m going to sue every one of them in a big way, plus the makers of the documentary.

Will say though, this stuff about going to the media first is tasteless, he should at least be able to state his case in a court as opposed to getting destroyed by people like James Cleverley before anyone has even spoken to a police officer. He sure comes across as a sleazeball, but that’s not quite the same as being a full on rapist, there are serious facts to find in amongst all the noise, and I thought that innocence or guilt was decided in a court, not in the papers.
 
Reactions: Hutch11 and Alan Dugdales Moustache

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #20
Difficult one to remain fair and open minded about when he's such a dislikable person. Always known for putting it about, imagine some falling over themselves to be with him, but equally can see him being arrogant enough not to like someone saying no to him. Once again though, regardless of proof or evidence, a name that will be forever tarnished even if proved innocent. Not sure how this is still allowed to happen every time. Times becoming tabloid too, but guess it is part of the Murdoch, Sky/Sun.
 
C

croatskyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #21
rob9872 said:
Difficult one to remain fair and open minded about when he's such a dislikable person. Always known for putting it about, imagine some falling over themselves to be with him, but equally can see him being arrogant enough not to like someone saying no to him. Once again though, regardless of proof or evidence, a name that will be forever tarnished even if proved innocent. Not sure how this is still allowed to happen every time. Times becoming tabloid too, but guess it is part of the Murdoch, Sky/Sun.
Click to expand...
Your first sentence, and the number of people saying similar, pretty much shows how the media can undermine the justice system.

i don’t care who you are, how odious you appear to be, how horrible you come across, you should be able to defend yourself in a court, with all the evidence to hand.

he comes across as a tosser, but I would never judge as to whether “he did it” based purely on what we’ve seen and heard so far, the only people who should be doing that are a jury, not social media and the papers.

Not sticking up for him at all, he’ll get his say in court by the looks of things, but it’s dangerous and horrible when it’s a trial by posters on social media with no access to evidence before a trial by a jury with full access to evidence
 
Reactions: Hutch11, RegTheDonk and TomRad85

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #22
Finham said:
Is social media making people stoopider, or have they always been like this but didn't have a platform?
Click to expand...

The latter
 
Reactions: AOM

shmmeee

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #23
Just to remind people. Jimmy Saville died an innocent man. Before we go all “no trial no deal”.
 
Reactions: stupot07, oakey and GaryMabbuttsLeftKnee

Evo1883

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #24
shmmeee said:
Just to remind people. Jimmy Saville died an innocent man. Before we go all “no trial no deal”.
Click to expand...
Doubt Russell is dying tomorrow ... and I'd imagine there's plenty of time to get a conviction if the accusations are true
 
Reactions: croatskyblue
N

napolimp

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #25
There's some absolute garbage being spouted on here about media/journalists.

That's two organisation staking there reputation and risking serious legal action if what they're reporting is untrue. This will have been thoroughly investigated by journalists involved, with heavy involvement from Times and Channel 4 legal departments.

Investigative journalism has a pivotal role to play in society, regardless of many people's new favourite buzz word - fake news. We're talking about exposing people with the influence and power to hush things in their industries and the public eye.

To say they should not be judged by the public prior to being tried in court is absolute rubbish, even if they were arrested without anything being leaked by the press they would still be tried by public opinion well before they ended up in court.
 
Reactions: stupot07, oakey and SBT

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #26
Big fan of brand and his spiritual takes on the universe. Hope this turns out not to be true
 
Reactions: Grendel, Sick Boy and napolimp

rob9872

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #27
napolimp said:
There's some absolute garbage being spouted on here about media/journalists.

That's two organisation staking there reputation and risking serious legal action if what they're reporting is untrue. This will have been thoroughly investigated by journalists involved, with heavy involvement from Times and Channel 4 legal departments.

Investigative journalism has a pivotal role to play in society, regardless of many people's new favourite buzz word - fake news. We're talking about exposing people with the influence and power to hush things in their industries and the public eye.

To say they should not be judged by the public prior to being tried in court is absolute rubbish, even if they were arrested without anything being leaked by the press they would still be tried by public opinion well before they ended up in court.
Click to expand...

We have a justice system that demands everyone deserves a fair platform. To say its Ok that it's trial by public is crazy, he is entitled to it as much as you or I. I cant stand him but his name certainly shouldn't be released. If they have evidence present it to the courts, then report on it after the trial.
 
Reactions: croatskyblue
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #28
croatskyblue said:
I happen, unfortunately, to know quite a bit about false allegations. It’s the most traumatic thing that can ever happen to you.
Click to expand...
Surely you don’t mean this literally?
 

Finham

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #29
SBT said:
Surely you don’t mean this literally?
Click to expand...
I'd say that being raped, just as an example, is possibly worse.
 
Reactions: oakey
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #30
croatskyblue said:
i don’t care who you are, how odious you appear to be, how horrible you come across, you should be able to defend yourself in a court, with all the evidence to hand.
Click to expand...
Brand has the right to defend himself in court whenever he likes - if these charges are false then he can file defamation suits against Channel 4 and News Corp first thing tomorrow morning.
 
Reactions: stupot07, duffer and oakey
C

croatskyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #31
SBT said:
Surely you don’t mean this
Click to expand...

Yes I do

I don’t expect understanding because unless you’ve been sucked into it it’s impossible to even explain. I’ll leave it there.
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #32
croatskyblue said:
Yes I do
Click to expand...
So of all the most traumatic things imaginable that you hope never happens to say, your children, being falsely accused of something is top of the list?
 
C

croatskyblue

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #33
SBT said:
So of all the most traumatic things imaginable that you hope never happens to say, your children, being falsely accused of something is top of the list?
Click to expand...

Like I said, I’ll leave it there. And don’t try to twist my words, Mr ‘Journalist’.
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #34
rob9872 said:
We have a justice system that demands everyone deserves a fair platform. To say its Ok that it's trial by public is crazy, he is entitled to it as much as you or I. I cant stand him but his name certainly shouldn't be released. If they have evidence present it to the courts, then report on it after the trial.
Click to expand...
Justice has to be seen to be done - if it happens in the shadows then the rich and powerful are often free to bully their way out of facing any scrutiny.

Journalists and whistleblowers have uncovered all kinds of crimes and corruption, including some of the most heinous and notorious criminals you can think of.
 
Reactions: duffer and oakey
N

napolimp

Well-Known Member
  • Sep 17, 2023
  • #35
rob9872 said:
We have a justice system that demands everyone deserves a fair platform. To say its Ok that it's trial by public is crazy, he is entitled to it as much as you or I. I cant stand him but his name certainly shouldn't be released. If they have evidence present it to the courts, then report on it after the trial.
Click to expand...

You're missing the point, I'm saying that for those organisations to release such accusations means there is something substantial there. Everyone has the right to a fair trial, but as a person in the public eye he would be tried by the court of public opinion way before a trial anyway - whether he was remanded with no previous public leak, or whether he's outed by the media.

At the end of the day, without the journalist intervention to investigate the story, the accusations would probably have never come to light - it has already been over a decade. And media outlets don't carry out investigative journalism to simply hand information over to the police without releasing the story.
 
Reactions: oakey
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • …
  • 7
Next
1 of 7 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • General Discussion
  • Off Topic Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?