Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Rumour: Hoffman and Elliot takeover negotiations (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Evo1883
  • Start date Apr 9, 2017
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • …
  • 163
Next
First Prev 19 of 163 Next Last

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #631
blueflint said:
if SISU had dealt honestly with the council from day one we would have the Ricoh arena not wasps so who's to blame
Click to expand...

No we wouldn't. A senior figure at the time thought the club were a huge obstacle that prevented it from rivalling the NEC.

He convinced the council this was a big money earner and would be a huge success.
 
Reactions: chiefdave, torchomatic and hutch1972

hutch1972

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #632
Grendel said:
No we wouldn't. A senior figure at the time thought the club were a huge obstacle that prevented it from rivalling the NEC.

He convinced the council this was a big money earner and would be a huge success.
Click to expand...
Was going to say myself , that had ccc been honest and upfront from the day it was built , wasps wouldn't be here either.
This hasn't just been a SISU issue the last decade, it has been ( as Grendel says) or was ,a spectacular failed attempt to make money off somebody else's dream.
 
Reactions: Wiseoldfool, chiefdave, torchomatic and 2 others

Irish Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #633
Liquid Gold said:
The fact that we're hailing Hoffman (vice chairman under sisu) and Elliot (the man who went round people's houses to take their shares of them for sisu) as potential saviours shows the absolute state we're in.
Click to expand...

When Sisu first took over, like most City fans, I was pleased. I thought it was a new beginning with wealthy owners. Did you realise and say at the time what a disaster Sisu were going to be? Elliot and Hoffman involved in the running of the club or continue with Sisu? You would sooner have Sisu? Both Elliot and Hoffman jumped ship fairly early on in Sisu's tenure once they had realised what was going on. Both are genuine City fans who travel home and away. It would be good to have a complete break from the past but the ultimate goal at the moment should surely be getting rid of Sisu and having someone in charge with the best interests of CCFC.
 
Reactions: Astute, letsallsingtogether, Captain Dart and 5 others
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #634
Irish Sky Blue said:
Did you realise and say at the time what a disaster Sisu were going to be?
Click to expand...
/puts hand up

Ooh me me, pick me please.

I certainly did, and spent a good couple of years being called a moron by people who lauded their good business sense, and how lucky we were to have business people in charge:banghead:
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #635
As for the rest, move on from Elliot (especially) and Hoffman.

They've been part of the problem, so why the hell would we want anybody from past boards back, when they've caused the mess?!?

Why the hell can't we have a new broom, with new owners and new board members untainted by incompetence and ineptitude?

Who in their right mind would settle for same old, same old?!?
 
Reactions: Esoterica and torchomatic

Sky Blue Kid

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #636
Irish Sky Blue said:
When Sisu first took over, like most City fans, I was pleased. I thought it was a new beginning with wealthy owners. Did you realise and say at the time what a disaster Sisu were going to be? Elliot and Hoffman involved in the running of the club or continue with Sisu? You would sooner have Sisu? Both Elliot and Hoffman jumped ship fairly early on in Sisu's tenure once they had realised what was going on. Both are genuine City fans who travel home and away. It would be good to have a complete break from the past but the ultimate goal at the moment should surely be getting rid of Sisu and having someone in charge with the best interests of CCFC.
Click to expand...

Very true, and yes I did mate.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #637
I was pleased when they took over as they had lots of nice sound bites unfortunately they have been a total disaster.

The only benefit has been they have taught me loads of new things I had no idea about hedge funds(still don't know much), judicial reviews how to go into admin to suit yourself and employ your pal and so much more.

But I think I have learnt enough now so Sepalla fuck off back under your stone.
 
Reactions: Astute, martcov, no_loyalty and 2 others

hutch1972

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #638
I personally would have that pair back tomorrow compared with what we have now.
They may make mistakes but they wouldn't rape the club financially .
 
Reactions: Astute, martcov, Kingokings204 and 9 others

Irish Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #639
shmmeee said:
It's a fucking stupid question. Only a few sad bitter CCFC fans who want to blame anyone but Sisu think Wasps are "unethical". The link is more tenuous than a very tenuous thing. There are no protests against Wasps, most people have no issue with them being here. It's just a crutch those desperate to blame others for our predicament cling on to.

It's really sad.
Click to expand...

Wasps being here can be directly linked to Sisu taking us to Northampton. It is down to Sisu that they are here. However I think that they are as much of a franchise as MK Dons and have left the communities in which they started and who supported and kept them going. They have no affinity or connection to this area and are simply here because of an opportunistic business deal. I hope that in the long run they fail and that we can get back the stadium that was built for us.
 
Reactions: Astute, stupot07, Wiseoldfool and 3 others

hutch1972

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #640
Deleted member 5849 said:
As for the rest, move on from Elliot (especially) and Hoffman.

They've been part of the problem, so why the hell would we want anybody from past boards back, when they've caused the mess?!?

Why the hell can't we have a new broom, with new owners and new board members untainted by incompetence and ineptitude?

Who in their right mind would settle for same old, same old?!?
Click to expand...
Because the chances of anybody other than them , or persons known to them buying this club is virtually nil.
 
Reactions: martcov

M&B Stand

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #641
The thing with Elliott what annoys some people, is the claims he made at the time of the takeover, that sisu were the only show in town. That was never tested, the vested interests of the previous owners wouldn't allow us go into administration because of the millions they were owned. So we ended up with 400 grand a year ranson and sisu.
Saying that, I'm sure he's a big fan of the club and a decent bloke, never met the fella.
 
Reactions: win9nut and Terry Gibson's perm

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #642
M&B Stand said:
The thing with Elliott what annoys some people, is the claims he made at the time of the takeover, that sisu were the only show in town. That was never tested, the vested interests of the previous owners wouldn't allow us go into administration because of the millions they were owned. So we ended up with 400 grand a year ranson and sisu.
Saying that, I'm sure he's a big fan of the club and a decent bloke, never met the fella.
Click to expand...


Like others - seen him at away games, and he gave me a free ticket for digging snow off Highfield Rd pitch (with others) to enable game (M'boro?) to go ahead. Seems genuine supporter.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #643
hutch1972 said:
Because the chances of anybody other than them , or persons known to them buying this club is virtually nil.
Click to expand...
Only because people lazily bring them up as the only option!

It's as bad as saying SISU are and were our only option.
 
Reactions: Astute, Captain Dart and torchomatic

hutch1972

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #644
Deleted member 5849 said:
Only because people lazily bring them up as the only option!

It's as bad as saying SISU are and were our only option.
Click to expand...
As far as we are aware sisu are not actively looking to sell , you must agree that is is highly unlikely that anyone with no connections to this city at all would contemplate buying it , especially with 10 years + of negative press.
I'm not saying they should run it , but we certainly need them and the likes of them , to draw potential buyers in.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #645
hutch1972 said:
As far as we are aware sisu are not actively looking to sell
Click to expand...
And when and if they are, people will come forward.

The problem with highlighting those two, is it actually closes off possible options. It's a version of the clock is ticking, that SISU employed.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #646
shmmeee said:
It's a fucking stupid question. Only a few sad bitter CCFC fans who want to blame anyone but Sisu think Wasps are "unethical". The link is more tenuous than a very tenuous thing. There are no protests against Wasps, most people have no issue with them being here. It's just a crutch those desperate to blame others for our predicament cling on to.

It's really sad.
Click to expand...

can't agree with a word of that Shmmeee.
 

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #647
M&B Stand said:
The thing with Elliott what annoys some people, is the claims he made at the time of the takeover, that sisu were the only show in town. That was never tested, the vested interests of the previous owners wouldn't allow us go into administration because of the millions they were owned. So we ended up with 400 grand a year ranson and sisu.
Saying that, I'm sure he's a big fan of the club and a decent bloke, never met the fella.
Click to expand...

Elliott is alright to run promotional events and glad hand visitors but a top notch business strategist he ain't.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #648
Deleted member 5849 said:
Only because people lazily bring them up as the only option!

It's as bad as saying SISU are and were our only option.
Click to expand...

the problem is NW that any hard nosed business person looking to buy a football club is unlikely to touch us with a barge pole.
I think it needs someone with emotional attachment to push things along. GH and JE are probably the only two with any connections and with any attachment to the club whatever their previous misdemeanours.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #649
Captain Dart said:
Elliott is alright to run promotional events and glad hand visitors but a top notch business strategist he ain't.
Click to expand...

wouldn't disagree with that and if there is anything to these latest rumours then I wouldn't imagine his role is anything beyond waxing lyrical about CCFC and pressing a bit of flesh.
 
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #650
clint van damme said:
the problem is NW that any hard nosed business person looking to buy a football club is unlikely to touch us with a barge pole.
I think it needs someone with emotional attachment to push things along. GH and JE are probably the only two with any connections and with any attachment to the club whatever their previous misdemeanours.
Click to expand...
Would rather have Brian McFadden or Frankie Muniz...

Would anybody have heard of Hoffman if he wasn't SISU's first vice-chairman? (incidentally, there were often statements he was Robinson's son-in-law, I assume this was nonsense?)

As for Elliott, what connections could he come up with that other reasonably successful local businessmen couldn't?!? I'd say the fact we can't reel off a list is an advantage, it shows they don't have a profile by virtue of being associated with the dismal failure of our football club!

The only reason they have a profile is because of their failures.
 
Reactions: Esoterica

blueflint

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #651
Grendel said:
No we wouldn't. A senior figure at the time thought the club were a huge obstacle that prevented it from rivalling the NEC.

He convinced the council this was a big money earner and would be a huge success.
Click to expand...


correct me if I'm wrong did the council withhold rent no did SISU yes and I don't care what the rent was its irrelevant
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Kid

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #652
Deleted member 5849 said:
Would rather have Brian McFadden or Frankie Muniz...

Would anybody have heard of Hoffman if he wasn't SISU's first vice-chairman? (incidentally, there were often statements he was Robinson's son-in-law, I assume this was nonsense?)

As for Elliott, what connections could he come up with that other reasonably successful local businessmen couldn't?!? I'd say the fact we can't reel off a list is an advantage, it shows they don't have a profile by virtue of being associated with the dismal failure of our football club!

The only reason they have a profile is because of their failures.
Click to expand...

can't really disagree with your assessment, but I'm still hoping there's something in the rumours which tells you a) how desperate we are and b) how gullible I am!
 
Reactions: Deleted member 5849
H

hotrod

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #653
blueflint said:
correct me if I'm wrong did the council withhold rent no did SISU yes and I don't care what the rent was its irrelevant
Click to expand...
A legally agreed rent which SISU agreed to.
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Kid

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #654
All out Tuesday I hear ?
 

zuni

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #655
? In the words of the little fella from different strokes...Wut you talking about Italia
 
W

weecohawena

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #656
Still going.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #657
Irish Sky Blue said:
Wasps being here can be directly linked to Sisu taking us to Northampton. It is down to Sisu that they are here. However I think that they are as much of a franchise as MK Dons and have left the communities in which they started and who supported and kept them going. They have no affinity or connection to this area and are simply here because of an opportunistic business deal. I hope that in the long run they fail and that we can get back the stadium that was built for us.
Click to expand...

It can also be directly linked to before Northampton too
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #658
Irish Sky Blue said:
I hope that in the long run they fail and that we can get back the stadium that was built for us.
Click to expand...

We are back at the stadium that was built for us ?
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #659
italiahorse said:
We are back at the stadium that was built for us ?
Click to expand...

It's not ours though. Re-read what he posted
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #660
Nick said:
It can also be directly linked to before Northampton too
Click to expand...

I thought Wasps only came on the scene when SISU took the club to Northampton?
 
Reactions: Astute

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #661
ccfc92 said:
It's not ours though. Re-read what he posted
Click to expand...
If Wasps leave it won't be ours either.
If Sisu ever got round to buy it after they leave it won't be ours either.
 

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #662
ccfc92 said:
I thought Wasps only came on the scene when SISU took the club to Northampton?
Click to expand...

I believe there was talk a lot by the present owner before he bought Wasps, but who really knows.
It fits in with the forums theme though that it's the councils fault.
 

ccfc92

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #663
italiahorse said:
If Wasps leave it won't be ours either.
If Sisu ever got round to buy it after they leave it won't be ours either.
Click to expand...

Just have to wait and see. Hopefully, new owners coming in can buy a % off Wasps or if Wasps go bust, they can buy the Ricoh for CCFC.

Who knows what SISU would do with the Ricoh if they owned it.
 

Nick

Administrator
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #664
ccfc92 said:
I thought Wasps only came on the scene when SISU took the club to Northampton?
Click to expand...

No, they had discussed it with the Council before.
 
Reactions: ccfc92

italiahorse

Well-Known Member
  • Apr 16, 2017
  • #665
ccfc92 said:
Just have to wait and see. Hopefully, new owners coming in can buy a % off Wasps or if Wasps go bust, they can buy the Ricoh for CCFC.

Who knows what SISU would do with the Ricoh if they owned it.
Click to expand...

If new owners were going to buy the club and the Ricoh why not just buy the club and build a new stadium for the same price?
On the same thing , why don't Sisu do that ?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • …
  • 163
Next
First Prev 19 of 163 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?