Slightly wrong with the grip, they changed the mass etc of the javelin.
Intriguing stuff.
View attachment 12262
An olympics where the athletes can take as many PEDs as they like.
I agree F1 is boring same old same old every race,Need to sort something in that and it might be worth watching?
In football, players should be able to be substituted and then come back on later.
If this happens it should not count against the number of substitutions allowed.
Of course, there'd need to be rules on how many times this could happen to prevent hundreds of substitutions as a time-wasting measure.
That you can touch anyone wherever you like, whenever you like.
There's been a couple of examples in recent cricket games where the ball hit the stumps but did not dislodge the bails.
If it touches the stumps, it should be out.
It does not matter how thin an edge you get to be caught, so it should not matter how thin the stumps get hit to be bowled.
The grass roots league I'm involved with in Norfolk does just this. Called a ro-ro substitution and works well when a player is either knackered and needs a breather or is going into one and needs 5 minutes to cool his head down or get sent off.In football, players should be able to be substituted and then come back on later.
If this happens it should not count against the number of substitutions allowed.
Of course, there'd need to be rules on how many times this could happen to prevent hundreds of substitutions as a time-wasting measure.
Here's an idea I got while watching close offside calls in the Women's World Cup.
VAR denied a couple of goals where it looked like a player was offside by just a couple of inches.
Change the offside rule to more benefit attackers by adding "a player can only be offside if both feet are offside".
In other words, so long as one foot is in line or behind the last defender, it's not offside.
That would be ok.That's how it used to be - as long as part of you was behind the line you were on - no idea why they changed it.
Unfortunately all it does then is change the emphasis of where the margin is - what if their other foot is really close to the offside line but the heel may/may not be offside?
Here's an idea I got while watching close offside calls in the Women's World Cup.
VAR denied a couple of goals where it looked like a player was offside by just a couple of inches.
Change the offside rule to more benefit attackers by adding "a player can only be offside if both feet are offside".
In other words, so long as one foot is in line or behind the last defender, it's not offside.
F1 should scrap qualifying and have the finishing order of the previous race back to front on the grid. Therefore the two Mercedes would almost permanently be on the back of the starting grid. Would make it a true test of skill for once.
Works for stock cars ok with red tops at the back at the start.
That you can touch anyone wherever you like, whenever you like.
But they seem to be treating it like the photo-finish of a 100mm sprint, where even if one person's nose crosses the line first, they win.Level was always onside
you can now be both ahead of and behind the last defender at the same time, and be offside - surely that is level
Now you can only be level if you are exactly the same shape and size as the last defender and in the exact same position
But they seem to be treating it like the photo-finish of a 100mm sprint, where even if one person's nose crosses the line first, they win.
I'd make the deciding body part the rearmost foot.
The downside is it would probably be too difficult for officials to judge, so it would require VAR.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?