Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Rotherham v Cov game now off too ! (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Sky Blue Harry H
  • Start date Mar 8, 2021
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • …
  • 12
Next
First Prev 6 of 12 Next Last
A

Alex1987

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #176
Skyblue_CP said:
People on twitter shouting about how Rotherham will have to play 3 games a week, think most have forgotten it takes two to tango, it would mean we would also have to play 3 matches that week aswell, again, putting us at a disadvantage.
Click to expand...

I suspect they'd put it in a week where we don't have another midweek fixture. So we'd go Sat-Tue-Sat or Sat-Thur-Sun for example
 
S

skybluesam66

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #177
reading their forum, they also have a few injuries, and are hoping a few of them can be back
so not only their covid players, but 2 or 3 injured players back
sounds a bit fishy to me
 
Reactions: covhead1 and Deleted member 2477

NortonSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #178
AFCCOVENTRY said:
As the issue is with Rotherham and now us, it’s up to us to agree any new proposed date for the re-arranged fixture.
Click to expand...
I don't believe we get a say in when the rearranged fixture is. Thats an EFL decision to set the date.
 

Sick Boy

Super Moderator
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #179
AFCCOVENTRY said:
As the issue is with Rotherham and now us, it’s up to us to agree any new proposed date for the re-arranged fixture.
Click to expand...
We’re not going to have the power to try and dictate anything.
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #180
skybluesam66 said:
reading their forum, they also have a few injuries, and are hoping a few of them can be back
so not only their covid players, but 2 or 3 injured players back
sounds a bit fishy to me
Click to expand...

Look, if you have the chance to get Richard Wood back to full fitness, and all you have to do is falsify medical records, destroy the rest of your season’s schedule, trigger an EFL investigation, and deliberately infect your staff with a deadly disease to get it done, it really is a no-brainer.
 
Reactions: LastGarrison, procdoc, clint van damme and 18 others
M

Magwitch1

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #181
riyadhskyblue said:
I don't believe we get a say in when the rearranged fixture is. Thats an EFL decision to set the date.
Click to expand...
I am sure the EFL have the discretion to move fixtures during this crisis I think that has been already been done but I’m not so sure about the international break that might not be in their remit as it is a UEFA stipulation I think.
 

MusicDating

Euro 2016 Prediction League Champion!!
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #182
stay_up_skyblues said:
Never seen anything like it. On a few occasions our winger (Kyle Ried!?) dribbled down the line, got to the corner flag then turned back around and ran to the halfway line instead of crossing. Also remember Bayliss or Westbrooke arriving late in the box and purposely launching his shot into the stand. I was amazed the EFL didn’t look into it.
Click to expand...
Looking at the highlights, it doesn't seem too bad a game. We certainly had more shots in that game than we did against Middlebrough!
 
Reactions: Sky Blue Pete and Otis

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #183
MusicDating said:
Looking at the highlights, it doesn't seem too bad a game. We certainly had more shots in that game than we did against Middlebrough!
Click to expand...
We did. We had some good chances. It mainly fizzled out in the second half.
 

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #184
Sick Boy said:
We’re not going to have the power to try and dictate anything.
Click to expand...

EFL will always look for a a mutually agreed date before enforcing.
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #185
Otis said:
We did. We had some good chances. It mainly fizzled out in the second half.
Click to expand...
Though obviously JCH was trying not to score for that one brilliant chance the keeper made a very good save for.

We were clearly trying to win the game at first, but then shut up shop and kept it right later on.

If the EFL had investigated that, we would have passed with flying colours.
 
Reactions: hill83 and Deleted member 9744

Paul Anthony

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #186
stay_up_skyblues said:
Never seen anything like it. On a few occasions our winger (Kyle Ried!?) dribbled down the line, got to the corner flag then turned back around and ran to the halfway line instead of crossing. Also remember Bayliss or Westbrooke arriving late in the box and purposely launching his shot into the stand. I was amazed the EFL didn’t look into it.
Click to expand...


We have to remember what was at stake for us.

Imagine if we'd gone all out to win it over the whole 90 minutes, and ended up having an injury or 2 to key players, and then gone on to lose against Notts County. There would have been a massive outrage. It didn't make sense to put everything into that game, there was far too much at stake, much more crucial things around the corner.
 

Sky Blue Harry H

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #187
Colin Steins Smile said:
The last 15 minutes v Bristol city in the 70's was pretty blatant too.
Click to expand...

Think there may even be a thread on the Sunderland forum about this....
 
Reactions: torchomatic, Otis, Jamesimus and 5 others

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #188
HuckerbyDublinWhelan said:
Whoever picked that didn’t watch the game. Either that or no other keeper did anything.

I stayed for the whole game. I think we had about 2 shots on target the whole game.

don’t get me wrong I justified it by - we needed a point we played for a point, the factMorecambe didn’t leave their half was neither here or there
Click to expand...

Their keeper pulled off an incredible save. Probably The only thing he had to do admittedly.
 
S

Speedies_Chips

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #189
skybluesam66 said:
reading their forum, they also have a few injuries, and are hoping a few of them can be back
so not only their covid players, but 2 or 3 injured players back
sounds a bit fishy to me
Click to expand...
The other side of the coin is that players who were fit enough to play for them this weekend might be injured whenever the re-arranged game is.
 
Reactions: Skyblue_LDN

Skyblue_LDN

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #190
it is what it is, on one hand they should possibly have to answer to the EFL for why they are having these outbreaks and if they are being strict enough, but ultimately COVID, and the health of their employees trumps football.

If they can't fulfil their fixtures the EFL will need to act, we can only concentrate on ourselves doing our best to dictate our own fate.
 

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #191
Not sure why people keep talking like the postponements are a massive benefit to Rotherham. They've got more games left than free slots in the calendar, it's more likely to have an adverse impact on their performance than positive even if they do get some injured players back.
 
Reactions: torchomatic, Irish Sky Blue, letsallsingtogether and 3 others

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #192
At the tail end of a season to have fixture congestion like they have isn’t great. So many players will be fatigued and get injured more easily.
 

Johhny Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #193
stay_up_skyblues said:
Never seen anything like it. On a few occasions our winger (Kyle Ried!?) dribbled down the line, got to the corner flag then turned back around and ran to the halfway line instead of crossing. Also remember Bayliss or Westbrooke arriving late in the box and purposely launching his shot into the stand. I was amazed the EFL didn’t look into it.
Click to expand...
Baka would have buried it
 

Johhny Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #194
AFCCOVENTRY said:
EFL will always look for a a mutually agreed date before enforcing.
Click to expand...
In the year 2525 if man is still alive..........
 
Reactions: torchomatic, RegiswasGod and oakey

Frostie

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #195
mark82 said:
Not sure why people keep talking like the postponements are a massive benefit to Rotherham. They've got more games left than free slots in the calendar, it's more likely to have an adverse impact on their performance than positive even if they do get some injured players back.
Click to expand...

Agreed.
Only way they "benefit" from it is if the season gets extended but can't see how that can happen. Firstly from an integrity point of view it creates a problem but also Playoff final is set as weekend of 28/29/30th May. Need to fit the semi-finals in first & can't push final date back because of the Euros.
 
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #196
Sorry to get in the way of a good conspiracy theory but surely this postponement is much worse for Rotherham than us?
 
Reactions: mark82 and Frostie
D

Deleted member 9744

Guest
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #197
Otis said:
Though obviously JCH was trying not to score for that one brilliant chance the keeper made a very good save for.

We were clearly trying to win the game at first, but then shut up shop and kept it right later on.

If the EFL had investigated that, we would have passed with flying colours.
Click to expand...
I agrre and the Morecambe match was perfectly legitimate albeit low in quality. As you say there were chances and saves.

I couldn't believe the fans getting on the back of the players at the end and willing for them to go forward. We needed to keep possession above all else and we are lucky that we had an old head there in Doyle. One mistake at the end there and our whole history over the last three years might have looked very different
 
Reactions: hill83, Frostie and Otis
S

steve cooper

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #198
mark82 said:
Not sure why people keep talking like the postponements are a massive benefit to Rotherham. They've got more games left than free slots in the calendar, it's more likely to have an adverse impact on their performance than positive even if they do get some injured players back.
Click to expand...
I think the problem is more about a number of clubs have had positive cases, and continued to fulfil their fixtures, in some cases without some of their best players, including us.
Rotherham benefit by not being forced to fulfil their fixtures with the players they have available who have tested negative, and also it has helped them with their other injuries.
The only reason to postpone games IMO is if they can't field 11 fit players who have tested negative + 2 or 3 on the bench. We don't know the exact circumstances of course.
 

Skyblue_CP

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #199
You have to wonder what the EFL are going to do considering that its being said that its against PFA regulation to play 3 matches in a week, the only real thing i can see is playing in international break. Unfortunatly that puts us at a disadvantage not having Osti for their 2 man mountains upfront.
 

Frostie

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #200

Homepage - The English Football League

The Official home of the English Football League
www.efl.com

No other club had a single positive case last week from 5409 tests.
Clearly Rotherham must be breaking protocols.
 
Reactions: wingy and Wiseoldfool

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #201
Skyblue_CP said:
You have to wonder what the EFL are going to do considering that its being said that its against PFA regulation to play 3 matches in a week, the only real thing i can see is playing in international break. Unfortunatly that puts us at a disadvantage not having Osti for their 2 man mountains upfront.
Click to expand...

The international break is a no go as we are disadvantaged. We can’t be disadvantaged like this.
 

no_loyalty

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #202
AFCCOVENTRY said:
The international break is a no go as we are disadvantaged. We can’t be disadvantaged like this.
Click to expand...

I suppose it depends if Osti is called up for Norway, if he isn't then I don't seeing it being a problem. I'm not too concerned about Gyo being called up for Sweden.
 
L

Legia Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #203
The only way for Rotherham not to play 3 times in one week is to play us or Luton during the international break, with the other game played in the mid week before the final weekend's fixtures. Big call by the EFL as to how they arrange this. Anyone know if Luton are likely to have any players likely to be called away on international duty? If they don't then it would be logical for them to play their Rotherham fixture in the break, rather than us play then (presuming Ostigaard gets called up by Norway).
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #204
No way can the EFL allow this, we would have a huge advantage if Gyokeres was ruled out for international duty, sounds fishy to me.
 
Reactions: better days

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #205
I think if we re only missing on player they could make us play.
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #206
 
L

Legia Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #207
Rotherham are a big physical side, so losing Ostigaard could be difficult for us if that's how things pan out.
 
R

roth_dave2003

Active Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #208
Legia Sky Blue said:
The only way for Rotherham not to play 3 times in one week is to play us or Luton during the international break, with the other game played in the mid week before the final weekend's fixtures. Big call by the EFL as to how they arrange this. Anyone know if Luton are likely to have any players likely to be called away on international duty? If they don't then it would be logical for them to play their Rotherham fixture in the break, rather than us play then (presuming Ostigaard gets called up by Norway).
Click to expand...

The Luton game has already been rearranged for Tuesday 4th May.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Saddlebrains

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #209
Frostie said:

Homepage - The English Football League

The Official home of the English Football League
www.efl.com

No other club had a single positive case last week from 5409 tests.
Clearly Rotherham must be breaking protocols.
Click to expand...



Right.

Has anyone actually read this?

1 club has 3 players with covid

3 PLAYERS and our games called off?

We had to play on earlier in the season with Wilson Mcfadz Shippers not able to play with covid/ isolating.



So how the fuck have they pulled this off?
 
Reactions: rexo87

stupot07

Well-Known Member
  • Mar 9, 2021
  • #210
Saddlebrains said:
Right.

Has anyone actually read this?

1 club has 3 players with covid

3 PLAYERS and our games called off?

We had to play on earlier in the season with Wilson Mcfadz Shippers not able to play with covid/ isolating.



So how the fuck have they pulled this off?
Click to expand...
But if those three players have been around the other players, then they would all need to self isolate.

This is what would happen in a normal work place, if you all had the track and trace app and one goes down, then the whole office would be told to self isolate.

Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • …
  • 12
Next
First Prev 6 of 12 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?