Aren't those 25 across the whole EFL?Not sure if this is Rotherham but 1 club has returned 25 positives that can’t be right
It is but the article on the EFL website says they tested all 72 clubs and 71 returned zero positive tests so all 25 positive tests must be at one club.Aren't those 25 across the whole EFL?
Oh, I see. BlimeyIt is but the article on the EFL website says they tested all 72 clubs and 71 returned zero positive tests so all 25 positive tests must be at one club.
Unbelievable. Not saying theyve done something dodgy but theres certainly not something right with that.Rotherham United record 25 positive Covid-19 cases in latest week of EFL testing - Rotherham record 25 positive Covid-19 cases
Rotherham FC make up .5% off all covid in the UK. impressive.
It's nothing like that many, surely?
Thought it was only Rotherham who were fucked with the build up of gamesThat would mean we play 4 games in 9 days & a fair bit of travel too. I don't think we should really be punished like that but I guess we won't get a say.
15th v Rotherham (A)
17th/18th v Barnsley (H)
21st v Stoke (A)
24th v Preston (H)
I'd have preferred 29th
Punished ? By the EFL ?Clearly a party after the Wednesday game. Should be punished
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Window lickers‘25 Positive Cases’
Rotherham United record 25 positive Covid-19 cases in latest week of EFL testing
Championship side Rotherham United record 25 positive Covid-19 cases in the latest week of testing.www.bbc.co.uk
what?Window lickers
what?
almost as bad as promoting the rape of animalswindow licker (plural window lickers) (Britain, slang, offensive) A mentally handicapped person.
Twatish thing to say really
Nothing like looking an owl in her eyes as you take her from behind.almost as bad as promoting the rape of animalsx
window licker (plural window lickers) (Britain, slang, offensive) A mentally handicapped person.
Twatish thing to say really
window licker (plural window lickers) (Britain, slang, offensive) A mentally handicapped person.
Twatish thing to say really
That would mean we play 4 games in 9 days & a fair bit of travel too. I don't think we should really be punished like that but I guess we won't get a say.
15th v Rotherham (A)
17th/18th v Barnsley (H)
21st v Stoke (A)
24th v Preston (H)
I'd have preferred 29th
Yeah, he's been called upHas Ostigaard actually been called up by Norway? If not the international break weekend would surely be best.
Yeah, he's been called up
It would work better for us if they moved our Barnsley game to Sunday because both us and Barnsley don't play again until the following WednesdayAnd McFadzean would be suspended too now.
The Telegraph article about the rearrangement is contradictory:
Rotherham boss admits congestion blow ahead of Sky Blues clash
Millers' manager Paul Warne expects no fixture favours from the Sky Blues and believes his side need five or six wins to survive, having only won nine all seasonwww.coventrytelegraph.net
Warne said:
“We are at the stage with the EFL where we have been given two options. We selected one that was preferable for me, they have come back and are saying they want us to take option two.
“We are saying that option two does not look very fair, it would be a game on a Monday and a Wednesday. Option One was a bit better, it was a Tuesday-Thursday-Sunday, which still was not amazing.”
If confirmed, the Millers will play at Huddersfield on Saturday, April 10, before entertaining QPR on Tuesday, April 13, City on Thursday 15 and yet another relegation rival, Birmingham City, on the Sunday (April 18).
And McFadzean would be suspended too now.
The Telegraph article about the rearrangement is contradictory:
Rotherham boss admits congestion blow ahead of Sky Blues clash
Millers' manager Paul Warne expects no fixture favours from the Sky Blues and believes his side need five or six wins to survive, having only won nine all seasonwww.coventrytelegraph.net
Warne said:
“We are at the stage with the EFL where we have been given two options. We selected one that was preferable for me, they have come back and are saying they want us to take option two.
“We are saying that option two does not look very fair, it would be a game on a Monday and a Wednesday. Option One was a bit better, it was a Tuesday-Thursday-Sunday, which still was not amazing.”
If confirmed, the Millers will play at Huddersfield on Saturday, April 10, before entertaining QPR on Tuesday, April 13, City on Thursday 15 and yet another relegation rival, Birmingham City, on the Sunday (April 18).
They shouldn’t be given any options they should be given dates and either play of forfeit the whole league calendar isn’t done to suit him.
Problem is for the week including our game: Sat: Huddersfield (a) strong team, as after break. Tues: QPR (h) winnable so strong/weak? Then Thurs Cov (h) winnable (but team knackered from Tues) strong/weak? as Sunday (H) Blues. I know I'm wanting it for us, but ours is the game that they will be most knackered for, unless they throw the QPR game (which would be dangerous re points)You can see them resting their best players in certain games and take free hit. Then go for it with the teams around them.
For me they shouldn't be given any options. EFL should tell them when they are playing with the agreement of the team they are playing. They have a squad and an academy set up. Tough luck if they have to use them to their detriment.
I don't think the league wants to be in a position where it's seen to be punishing teams for Covid outbreaks. If it was us dealing with 25 cases (and there by the grace of etc etc) then we would be rightly furious if we were suddenly stripped of any say in when we completed our fixtures.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?