Nick
Administrator
Always the case, it is even worse with ex players as it's a case of "why didnt they then".
By the way, players we lost and missed out on (Fleck and L Clarke are now only substitutes for Sheff utd).
But the way people talk about them on here they would have made us promotion certainties.
By the way, players we lost and missed out on (Fleck and L Clarke are now only substitutes for Sheff utd).
But the way people talk about them on here they would have made us promotion certainties.
??? Sorry Nick, but don't get that reply.Always the case, it is even worse with ex players as it's a case of "why didnt they then".
It's like when somebody would say:??? Sorry Nick, but don't get that reply.
"it is even worse with ex players as it's a case of "why didnt they then· Why didn't they what?
Ahh ok then, got you. Yeah, would be good to keep our better players but they never took us up last year so why should they this year. If we could have kept our best players and added on to them then maybe a chance but last year the best players were on loan so no chance of keeping them. This year the best players are ours, Jones, Willis, Turnbull, Bigirimana, Charles-Cook, Rose and lots of promise Stevenson. At last we have a foundation to build on, thanks to TM and MV. I think next year could be a great year for us as TM has taken players on on longer contracts so the heart of the team wil have already been together for a year.Better than before when a new team needed every season. TM is slowly building a team, give him time to build it.It's like when somebody would say:
John fleck would get us promoted.
Even though he played for us and we were nowhere near even with him.
Well you don't Nick , every idea , suggestion , protest , etc etc that gets mentioned , you shoot down , let's discuss why this forum houses supporters who are on a completely different wavelength to the vast majority .Oh so they don't care either now then? Nice one.
Well you don't Nick , every idea , suggestion , protest , etc etc that gets mentioned , you shoot down , let's discuss why this forum houses supporters who are on a completely different wavelength to the vast majority .
and for the record , getting involved in just one song about sisu wouldn't hurt eh , too much to ask ??? Not at all get a grip.
Shows how bad this forum can be , when you get called a weirdo for singing (actually happened here on skybluestalk)
EDIT:maybe I'm being a bit harsh , just frustration at the clubs current situation , apologies
Being top of the league with John Fleck playing at the time....It's like when somebody would say:
John fleck would get us promoted.
Even though he played for us and we were nowhere near even with him.
Being top of the league with John Fleck playing at the time....
The manager should take the Fleck for thatYes, then falling down it while he was "playing".
Pyjama fancy dress game as we're all tired of sisu
Can all take pillows and have a big pillow fight in the unlikely event we score
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Come on, tell us what you think we should do to increase the pressure to get rid??
Find them a way out for starters.
Think of ways to make the club look more appealing to new buyers.
Whatever we do, it needs to be about being pro ccfc and not anti anybody. Which is when everybody agrees.
Such as??
It's not anti-CCFC to be anti-SISU, you and others like you need to get that into your head.
Thinking about it season ticket should go if they want, they've paid their money and it's in the sisu bank,
Stop The walk up yes that hurts sisu in the pocket
You have to present a viable way out. SISU don't have one, if someone came up with one they'd be off like a shot. Selling the Ricoh quite possibly removed the only viable exit strategy.So Nick, do tell us what you think the most effective way of pressuring SISU to leave is?
I think a new owner would have every chance of getting CCC and Wasps etc onside; more than anything else it has been SISU's behaviour which has alienated the other parties to the point that trust has gone and now nobody wants to work with us. New owners would change that scenario.why would a buyer want to come in and invest money?
Using that petition as an example, it effectively says "thanks for investing your money, now piss off". Would that not be offputting?
If somebody takes over CCFC, what will they actually get and then do to get us going? Stadium / Academy etc.
Would a new buyer want to be at the mercy of Wasps / the council etc? Would they be put off if they have seen everybody going at the club like they are now? would they want to be in a wasps branded stadium?
.
I think a new owner would have every chance of getting CCC and Wasps etc onside; more than anything else it has been SISU's behaviour which has alienated the other parties to the point that trust has gone and now nobody wants to work with us. New owners would change that scenario.
Any investor knows 2 things: 1) football clubs can be money ptis which they have to buy with their eyes wide open (unlike SISU who admitted not doing their due diligence) and 2) there is the Southampton/Swansea/Bournemouth/Stoke etc model where clubs can succeed with reasonable investment. For that reason, our low price tag makes us a potentially attractive buy.
But that money has to be found if it's not there. So I assume it would be down to our owners to stump up the dosh from somewhere.Has anybody tried to work out how much of the walk up goes to the SISU pocket compared to how much goes to running the club?
But that money has to be found if it's not there. So I assume it would be down to our owners to stump up the dosh from somewhere.
Hardly as un-ideal as upping sticks and moving to a much smaller ground.OR they just cut some costs to cover it? OR they just add to the debt?
Both aren't really ideal are they?
Hardly as un-ideal as upping sticks and moving to a much smaller ground.
Don't you think a protest boycott would convince them that the fan-base is irreconcilably opposed to them and that therefore they'll sell up? That's the point.Maybe we could protest and block a move by making them know it would be too small then? Rather than boycotting and giving them proof they dont need a big ground?
Don't you think a protest boycott would convince them that the fan-base is irreconcilably opposed to them and that therefore they'll sell up? That's the point.
Don't get me wrong, SISU leaving will not solve all our problems by a long chalk but it's the pre-requisite mandatory requirement before a recovery can begin.
Can those think think that doing the opposite of a boycott and filling the stadium instead please tell me where they think 28,000 willing participants are going to come from. Will never happen.
No. Because 1) its clearly a protest and a one-off where there stadium would be empty and 2) even our latter years in the Champ show that with a bit of success (always plus 15k gates) we'd be shooting ourselves in the foot to move to a 15k capacity ground.Whereas stupidly low attendances doesn't justify a move to say a 15k stadium?
Face it, the BPA is a non-starter - sorry to wee on your dreams but let's face it, you do that to everyone else all the damn time.
Well with an apparent 14000 break even figure that must have been doing that for months.OR they just cut some costs to cover it? OR they just add to the debt?
Both aren't really ideal are they?
Has anybody tried to work out how much of the walk up goes to the SISU pocket compared to how much goes to running the club?
YAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN Fucking hell change the record for fucks sake.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?