stupot07
Well-Known Member
These sort of things are usually said when the manager has lost the dressing room.
These sort of things are usually said when the manager has lost the dressing room.He was basically saying the players need to start showing some bollocks
The guy needs an assistant, you can't just take away his right hand man and expect things to just carry on regardless. He's a lost soul out thereThese sort of things are usually said when the manager has lost the dressing room.
For me Robins totally got the system wrong so he should take the blame for that.These sort of things are usually said when the manager has lost the dressing room.
Just fuck offled to believe there are ‘ongoing discussions’ around the future of MR at the club and I think his comments are those of someone looking to shift the blame - looks like the Rudoni slice of luck was just that, and MR struggles with ‘horses for courses’ tactics for the team in front of you…
….and I’ll say this until I’m blue in the face and don’t care what the sycophants say, we need a stronger midfield of Sheaf, Torp (at 10) and one other, Eccles playing a long hoof to their keeper with 30 seconds to go is criminal, he’s not the answer
Just fuck off
What do you expect when you post such nonsense hyperbolic shite?Grow up
What do you expect when you post such nonsense hyperbolic shite?
1) you know fek all about Robins future so don't pretend that you do. I hardly think Doug has shared his thoughts with a gimp like you.
2) he accepted responsibility for tonight and didn't shift the blame on Rudi
3) what coaching badges do you hold to say he's tactically unable to see what's un front of him?
4) you're calling out two of our best performers that really aren't a problem. Of course we could do with another in there, two deals fell through, no point wasting on someone who isn't better
5) err yes I think I understand my own post, but if you want to play top trumps go for it.
No, I meant hyperbolic which is what I typed. I perfectly understand it thank you and if you would like to go down that route, then quite simply you'll look even sillier than you already do.resorting to calling me a ‘gimp’ is hardly a strong start to an argument…..
I’ve got my UEFA A licence seeing as you ask, so I’d say I probably know a fair bit, but you don’t need that to see he isn’t the strongest when it comes to setting up for what’s in front of you
I never said he blamed Rudi, and I haven’t called out any ‘strong performer’ but Josh Eccles wasn’t anything other than ordinary - don’t care about what might’ve been, that’s no excuse…
hyperbole isn’t what you meant, you just tried to use a big word to sound clever
Rudoni was fit. He plays that position. MR picked our best fit no. 8/10 and played him at LWB because it looked good for a bit vs. Luton. He could've started:
Dovin
MVE
Thomas
Binks
Da Silva
Sheaf
Eccles
Rudoni
Sakamoto
Thomas Assante
Wright
and none of those choices would've raised any eyebrows. Players in their best positions, picked on merit or as a decent option if others aren't fit.
Because he’s very limited on the ballBut why would you drop Latibeaudiere when he has been brilliant and does seem to care.
Genuine question and I’ve just woke up from a nightmare so apologies if this has already been brought up
To be fair why the feck do you get booked for decent after we have scored. I'd be fuming with him as well. He will now miss the Sunderland game.The weird pop at Eccles for dissent is also bonkers. At least he's having a pop at the referee.
Precisely.Im pleased the rubbish about sacking him has largely gone, but next time he's interviewed, can someone let him know that he's allowed to make tactical changes before the clockwork 61st minute.
Eccles is fine and not the problem.led to believe there are ‘ongoing discussions’ around the future of MR at the club and I think his comments are those of someone looking to shift the blame - looks like the Rudoni slice of luck was just that, and MR struggles with ‘horses for courses’ tactics for the team in front of you…
….and I’ll say this until I’m blue in the face and don’t care what the sycophants say, we need a stronger midfield of Sheaf, Torp (at 10) and one other, Eccles playing a long hoof to their keeper with 30 seconds to go is criminal, he’s not the answer
Im pleased the rubbish about sacking him has largely gone, but next time he's interviewed, can someone let him know that he's allowed to make tactical changes before the clockwork 61st minute.
He wanted to hire and assistant and it was vetoed by his bossYeah.
We need to stop with the hands are tied bullshit.
Do you have proof of that?He wanted to hire and assistant and it was vetoed by his boss
Sent from my Pixel 7 using Tapatalk
Do you have proof of that?
Pressure is on him to get a massive performance at Sunderland now. Another loss into the international break and it will be doom here again.
I agree 100% with this. The issue for me is that we have been chopping & changing which does ring alarm bells. I can only hope that the solution is found.Agree Chris. But I think the 5 at the back with Rudoni is a bust now and for me was never really a good thing. So we should move back to the formation this years intake we envisaged to be in.
At least that would be mildly amusing whilst making a point,Because the players would go over and stand in silence if it wasn't after 60 minutes.
Spot on. I thought Wright looked very slow last night and not comfortable where he was at all.Exactly that. Surely over the last two seasons it’s been firmly established Sakamoto can only play wing and Wright (by far our best attacker) does best on the left side. Sometimes it’s very simple. Just play them there.
Based on yesterday, we barely know how to play football.We won't. We're too soft.
We don't really know how to manage games.
This is the issue isn’t it.The time for excuses is running out.
That performance was unacceptable.
There were 5 “first team” outfield players on the bench - defence, midfield and attack. We are allowed 5 subs in a match. It’s not that long since 5 would have been the maximum number on the bench. We have had far, far weaker benches than that.I definitely think having so many kids on the bench, was a factor in Robins' thinking. It wasn't a strong bench tonight
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?