Non AMP
Sky Blues Talk
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
This is a mobile optimized page that loads fast, if you want to load the real page, click this text.

Robins Interview (1 Viewer)

  • Thread starter Nick
  • Start date Feb 15, 2022
Forums New posts
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 4 of 6 Next Last

SlowerThanPlatt

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #106
shepardo01 said:
Out of interest, who would you have brought in, that was available, within budget and would not have unsettled the squad - genuine question without any malice intended here.
Easy to say - let's get an attacking mf in.
Much harder to do.
Click to expand...

Skybluebeliever said Robins had identified one he wanted but didn’t happen for whatever reason…
 

shepardo01

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #107
SlowerThanPlatt said:
Skybluebeliever said Robins had identified one he wanted but didn’t happen for whatever reason…
Click to expand...
Yeah - heard that - but easy to think straight away that he "wasn't allowed".
Could easily have just not been available or became not available.
 
B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #108
shepardo01 said:
Yeah - heard that - but easy to think straight away that he "wasn't allowed".
Could easily have just not been available or became not available.
Click to expand...

I don’t think £ is unreasonable to suggest looking at what we had to do to bring in just Bidwell
 

Ccfcisparks

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #109
shepardo01 said:
Out of interest, who would you have brought in, that was available, within budget and would not have unsettled the squad - genuine question without any malice intended here.
Easy to say - let's get an attacking mf in.
Much harder to do.
Click to expand...
Cameron Archer
 

shepardo01

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #110
Ccfcisparks said:
Cameron Archer
Click to expand...
Isn't he an out and out forward?
 

COVKIDSNEVERQUIT

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #111
Nick said:
Baffling how he said he wanted to hold on until we could make changes and go for it.

What does he mean? Waghorn?
Click to expand...


Cardiff used their kids we don't.
 
Reactions: Saddlebrains

Torquay Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #112
COVKIDSNEVERQUIT said:
Cardiff used their kids we don't.
Click to expand...
And they made a change in the first half taking a striker off because he wasn't closing down. Brave and seemed to work
 

skyblueeyesrevisited

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #113
MR appears to plan his substitutions before kick off. Generally doesn’t make his first change until 60 minutes. Always seems to be happy to be 0-0 at half time. His changes at Cardiff seemed to be a reaction to their substitutions. He is rarely proactive.
 
Reactions: Earlsdon_Skyblue1
S

SheafIsGod

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #114
CovBrummie94 said:
Go on then, who would you want to replace him?
Click to expand...

Eric Black
 
Reactions: Blind-Faith, CovBrummie94 and SlowerThanPlatt

stevefloyd

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #115
SheafIsGod said:
Eric Black
Click to expand...
Pep...see how good he is with a restricted budget
 

Wyken Sky Blue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #116
Liquid Gold said:
We don't play a high intensity game any more. We dropped that tactic a while ago and now are a possession side with no cutting edge.
Click to expand...
Yes very true

Either way Cardiff stepped back, saved their energy, cleared their lines and took their oppurtunities when arrived

Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #117
COVKIDSNEVERQUIT said:
Cardiff used their kids we don't.
Click to expand...

Which kids?
We don't use Tavares, we do use Eccles when fit.
Who else?
 
Reactions: SBT

Kubrick

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #118
clint van damme said:
Which kids?
We don't use Tavares, we do use Eccles when fit.
Who else?
Click to expand...

Bidwell is starting ahead of Maatsen at LWB. He got dropped to the bench after scoring the winner in the last game (playing out of position) and was brought on for 15 minutes in yet another different position. Shambolic decisions.
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #119
jamboy said:
Bidwell is starting ahead of Maatsen at LWB. He got dropped to the bench after scoring the winner in the last game (playing out of position) and was brought on for 15 minutes in yet another different position. Shambolic decisions.
Click to expand...

Maatsen isn't an under 23 player though.
Hes very part of the first team squad.

Personally I'd have had him in in place of Shipley.
 

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #120
SlowerThanPlatt said:
Robins himself said the energy levels weren’t there tbf
Click to expand...

And I'd agree with that compared with our usual game, we lacked our urgency and intensity.

Just disagree with a poster saying that Cardiff looked fresher and fitter than us, they just took their chances well and defended very well. Are they a better team than us? Maybe defensively? Not sure about elsewhere mind.
 

Kubrick

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #121
clint van damme said:
Maatsen isn't an under 23 player though.
Hes very part of the first team squad.
Click to expand...

He’s 19 and lost his place in the side to a 28 old who’s been poor. If being played out of position, getting dropped after scoring the winner or getting sent on for 15 minutes after we’ve gone goal behind is “very much part of the first team squad“ then god help us.
 

covmark

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #122
Grendel said:
If you equate the last 19 games over a season we would be hovering on around 50 points - we have no ability to improve the squad unless we sell the best players we have
Click to expand...
Why would you equate the last 19 games over a season? Fact is, win our game/games in hand we would be 3pts off top 6. Yet you claim we're a relegation team. Bizarre.

Sent from my SM-G780F using Tapatalk
 

Grendel

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #123
covmark said:
Why would you equate the last 19 games over a season? Fact is, win our game/games in hand we would be 3pts off top 6. Yet you claim we're a relegation team. Bizarre.

Sent from my SM-G780F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

when I posted this thread we were in the promotion hunt in league 1 and then started the same points accumulation we are seeing now.

we were relegated the next season having topped league 1 in October that year

And The Cracks are Beggining to Show

I always judge the performance by looking at it as an independent and if I would know who was second from top and who second from bottom. Today I did not. It was an even game and actually when Oldham were forced to move forward they looked more capable than us. We are starting to have some...
www.skybluestalk.co.uk
 

Jamesimus

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #124
jamboy said:
He’s 19 and lost his place in the side to a 28 old who’s been poor. If being played out of position, getting dropped after scoring the winner or getting sent on for 15 minutes after we’ve gone goal behind is “very much part of the first team squad“ then god help us.
Click to expand...

I mean, that is very much part of the first team squad, by definition...
 

clint van damme

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #125
jamboy said:
He’s 19 and lost his place in the side to a 28 old who’s been poor. If being played out of position, getting dropped after scoring the winner or getting sent on for 15 minutes after we’ve gone goal behind is “very much part of the first team squad“ then god help us.
Click to expand...

You've clearly totally misunderstood my initial post.
People are referring to under the 23 players when talking about throwing in the youngsters.
 

blunted

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #126
Every team now rightly complains if they have to play too many matches in a short period of time. It is a particular problem for us, as we have such a small squad. Liverpool, Chelsea even Man City complain that their players are not at their best when tired. That is why the League Cup is generally ignored and even the FA Cup has been devalued by the top teams, and even us for the League Cup.
Football is not like the 60s where the players went out on the piss all week and looked great on a Saturday. Anyone who uses the "they are professional athletes" argument is frankly out of touch with the modern game. Either that, or the top Prem managers are wrong. Hmm, who would I rather listen to.
Our players are shagged out and need a rest, particularly those carrying injuries. No point putting in players who MR and AV think will not perform better than those on the pitch.
If we are 3-0 up (ho ho) and coasting, or dead rubber matches you will see more of Jones and Tavares. They may even have to step up if our injury crisis worsens.
Give the players and managers a break, we have just lost to a team that have now won four on the bounce at home and in conditions that ideally suited their type of game.
And lay off players who can do no right with the usual suspects on here. There is good article in the Times somewhere how negative social media comments can become a self-fulfilling prophecy and cause players to lose focus. Marcus Rashford is a prime example.
 
Reactions: DazzleTommyDazzle

pipkin73

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #127
Southampton play a high-intensity game and in The Sun today they have reported that at between 60-70 mins they always seem to have an injury.
Whilst the player is being treated the rest of the team go to the touchline and take an energy booster drink (takes approx 10 mins to kick in) and then seem to go up a level whilst the other team tires.
Is this something we could try as it's legal to take this energy booster?
With MR saying they are knackered it might just give them that little boost at the end of a game (could they even take one just before a game)?
 
Reactions: RegiswasGod and Brighton Sky Blue

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #128
Grendel said:
he clearly doesn’t think he’s good enough
Click to expand...

How do you know unless he's given a chance?
 
K

KenilworthSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #129
mark82 said:
How do you know unless he's given a chance?
Click to expand...

I think the fact he isn't getting any game time despite us being at the bare bones up front is pretty telling.

Robins will see Tavares day in day out in training so if he's not being brought on even in the latter end of games that suggests he's simply on the bench to make up the numbers and isn't good enough.
 

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #130
KenilworthSkyBlue said:
I think the fact he isn't getting any game time despite us being at the bare bones up front is pretty telling.

Robins will see Tavares day in day out in training so if he's not being brought on even in the latter end of games that suggests he's simply on the bench to make up the numbers and isn't good enough.
Click to expand...
But manager's do also have little quirks and favourites that they respond to. Just because they've got coaching badges doesn't mean they're immune to making mistakes. Mourinho failed to play Lukaku, De Bruyne AND Salah at Chelsea because of his opinion of what he thought they offered. Looks very silly now. Obviously I'm not comparing our players to that, just using it as an example of the fact that managers can make a wrong call about someone.

Look back to Pressley, and his decision to play Wilson. I think all of us questioned that, given Wilson's lack of experience and he'd hardly pulled up trees on loan. But he got thrown in and never looked back. That could very easily have gone the other way. Bayliss was also brought in way before the manager wanted to because of necessity and again took his chance better than we could have hoped. Meanwhile others with great fanfare, like Giddings, Thomas, Thornton and Ponticelli, have, for various reasons, been unsuccessful. But would it be better if we were here, years later, saying 'imagine what might've been had we given so-and-so a chance"?
 
S

SBT

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 16, 2022
  • #131
mark82 said:
How do you know unless he's given a chance?
Click to expand...

Is Robins obliged to give every player he doesn’t think is good enough a chance for your benefit?
 

larry_david

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 17, 2022
  • #132
He's given Shipley enough chances recently and that's pure fail
 
Reactions: slyblue57

mark82

Super Moderator
  • Feb 17, 2022
  • #133
SBT said:
Is Robins obliged to give every player he doesn’t think is good enough a chance for your benefit?
Click to expand...

Obviously not, but we should also not assume that is the conclusion. Tuesday aside, it really hasn't been the right time to throw him in.

I'm not sure how much less he could offer than Shipley or Waghorn though.
 
K

KenilworthSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 17, 2022
  • #134
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
But manager's do also have little quirks and favourites that they respond to. Just because they've got coaching badges doesn't mean they're immune to making mistakes. Mourinho failed to play Lukaku, De Bruyne AND Salah at Chelsea because of his opinion of what he thought they offered. Looks very silly now. Obviously I'm not comparing our players to that, just using it as an example of the fact that managers can make a wrong call about someone.

Look back to Pressley, and his decision to play Wilson. I think all of us questioned that, given Wilson's lack of experience and he'd hardly pulled up trees on loan. But he got thrown in and never looked back. That could very easily have gone the other way. Bayliss was also brought in way before the manager wanted to because of necessity and again took his chance better than we could have hoped. Meanwhile others with great fanfare, like Giddings, Thomas, Thornton and Ponticelli, have, for various reasons, been unsuccessful. But would it be better if we were here, years later, saying 'imagine what might've been had we given so-and-so a chance"?
Click to expand...

I get what you're saying SBD but I think that's a stretch. Mourinho is pretty well known for giving limited opportunities to youth players. In fact he's been fairly critical of the academies of his former clubs claiming the players in development weren't good enough. Robins on the other hand is more than willing to provide opportunities to development players, as repeatedly shown in his past 4+ years here.

I'm not saying Robins is immune from making the wrong call, in fact I've repeatedly pushed that point previously. But I do think he has a better idea than most of whether a player is able to make the grade or not and could contribute in games. All the players you've mentioned broke through in L1/2 where it's far easier for development players to contribute on the pitch. The Championship is a completely different kettle of fish.

The issue with Tavares as well is that reports suggest that whilst he's scoring goals he's not a stand out player in the U23's. Equally, there's the issue of him still being too slight which he needs to work on. Ignoring all this on the basis of he might be the next Wilson just doesn't make a great deal of sense. You're making an exception the rule.
 
Last edited: Feb 17, 2022
Reactions: Frostie and SBT
D

Deleted member 5849

Guest
  • Feb 17, 2022
  • #135
Sky_Blue_Dreamer said:
Look back to Pressley, and his decision to play Wilson. I think all of us questioned that, given Wilson's lack of experience and he'd hardly pulled up trees on loan. But he got thrown in and never looked back. That could very easily have gone the other way.
Click to expand...
Aaron Phillips, Billy Daniels, Jack Finch.

Also players given a chance by Pressley. But they turned out to be shit (tbf I liked Phillips! Surprised he didn't make more of a league career than he did, but that's for another day).

It's nonsensical to look at what happened to Wilson as an example, because there are countless other examples of players who never made it. Adam Walker looked every bit a future star in the youth team... but wasn't.

And sure, managers get it wrong from time to time, but more often than not somebody isn't playing at all because they're not at the level required.
 
Reactions: SBT

sylus

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 17, 2022
  • #136
KenilworthSkyBlue said:
The issue with Tavares as well is that reports suggest that whilst he's scoring goals he's not a stand out player in the U23's. Equally, there's the issue of him still being too slight which he needs to work on. Ignoring all this on the basis of he might be the next Wilson just doesn't make a great deal of sense. You're making an exception the rule.
Click to expand...

how can he not be a stand out player for the U23, when he is scoring for fun
 

Flying Fokker

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 17, 2022
  • #137
SkyblueTexan said:
This would be my conversation with MR
Click to expand...
Better start/poorer finish. Mix it up a bit with last season and we are up there in the top 6. But we will always have a lower budget won’t we. Better get SISU to buy wasps. More revenue and the option of dissolving their company…
 
K

KenilworthSkyBlue

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 17, 2022
  • #138
sylus said:
how can he not be a stand out player for the U23, when he is scoring for fun
Click to expand...

In terms of he doesn't dominate games or look a class above the rest. I think he's just one of those players that will be fairly anonymous for 90 minutes but will happen to pop up with a goal or two.
 

larry_david

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 17, 2022
  • #139
If tavares debuts, doesn't stand out but scores. I'll take it.
 
Reactions: no_loyalty, Sky_Blue_Dreamer and sylus

Sky_Blue_Dreamer

Well-Known Member
  • Feb 17, 2022
  • #140
Deleted member 5849 said:
Aaron Phillips, Billy Daniels, Jack Finch.

Also players given a chance by Pressley. But they turned out to be shit (tbf I liked Phillips! Surprised he didn't make more of a league career than he did, but that's for another day).

It's nonsensical to look at what happened to Wilson as an example, because there are countless other examples of players who never made it. Adam Walker looked every bit a future star in the youth team... but wasn't.

And sure, managers get it wrong from time to time, but more often than not somebody isn't playing at all because they're not at the level required.
Click to expand...
But how did we find out those players weren't up to it? By giving them a chance. Yes, it was a lower level but the reason we can say they weren't up to it was because we gave them the opportunity to prove themselves.

There's the argument that he's scoring goals but not standing out. What is our biggest problem at the moment? Scoring goals. What has Tavares been doing in the U23's? Scoring goals. He may not (and probably is not) the answer, but it's a potential solution that, in our current striking situation, is worth exploring at some point.
 
Reactions: no_loyalty
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Next
First Prev 4 of 6 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 2 (members: 0, guests: 2)
Share:
Facebook Twitter Reddit Pinterest Tumblr WhatsApp Email
  • Home
  • Forums
  • Coventry City Football Club
  • Coventry City General Chat
  • Default Style
  • Contact us
  • Terms and rules
  • Privacy policy
  • Help
  • Home
Community platform by XenForo® © 2010-2021 XenForo Ltd.
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Home
  • Forums
    • New posts
    • Search forums
  • What's new
    • New posts
    • Latest activity
  • Members
    • Current visitors
  • Donate to the Season Ticket Fund
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?