Can someone please explain to me why Robins insists on playing Haynes?! He seems to have a complete blind spot about him. He constantly plays short passes, is extremely predictable which allows the opposition to intercept the ball almost every time. He can't head the ball, he doesn't know how to run down the wing into space....holds the ball up for no apparent reason. He takes for ever to take a throw in....some may say he's waiting for some movement...well actually the movement was happening the moment the throw was ready to be taken but then dies out once Haynes had dithered and missed the opportunity. I cannot find one single reason as to why Robins sticks with him.
Stokes needs game time to build his confidence...he's a far superior player and much better defender. In my opinion an under par Stokes is still a better bet...Because Stokes has been so poor. If there was any sort of real challenge for the spot I'm sure Haynes wouldn't get a look in.
Yeah, tend to agree, but he clearly hasn't been the same player this season and seems to have visibly slowed too.Stokes needs game time to build his confidence...he's a far superior player and much better defender. In my opinion an under par Stokes is still a better bet...
That's true...but I kinda feel a decent run of games might sort that out. His positional play and reading of the game is way better than Haynes, so his speed is less of an issue. Yesterday the only two decent looking tackles Haynes made were when he was out of position and had to frantically run back and get a foot on the ball. It looked impressive but a better positioned player would have dealt with it much more calmly.Yeah, tend to agree, but he clearly hasn't been the same player this season and seems to have visibly slowed too.
Stokes needs game time to build his confidence...he's a far superior player and much better defender. In my opinion an under par Stokes is still a better bet...
Stokes performances this season have been worse than Haynes.
.
Well, yep, as if it makes up for all the other things he did wrong.Can't believe people getting excited over Haynes making 2 tackles in a game.
Haynes has been mentioned by many supporters this season of the opposing team of what a good player he is - If the scouts have been noting he actually may be on his way in the summer to better financial pastures new and possibly league 1 - Most of the season we have not been letting any goals but also not scoring - W now have two exciting overlapping fullbacks that are helping dramatically improving our goals for of late - Issue are in midfield, central defence and goalkeeper they have to be better - Although this is a haynes defence reponse, I did notice a few having a go at Jack grimmer saying he was not good enough - Is this the same Jack Grimmer that was voted in the leage two team of the year last week???
I did notice a few having a go at Jack grimmer saying he was not good enough - Is this the same Jack Grimmer that was voted in the leage two team of the year last week???
Isn't Burge too? Just to show you how much it actually meansIs this the same Jack Grimmer that was voted in the leage two team of the year last week??
Can someone please explain to me why Robins insists on playing Haynes?! He seems to have a complete blind spot about him. He constantly plays short passes, is extremely predictable which allows the opposition to intercept the ball almost every time. He can't head the ball, he doesn't know how to run down the wing into space....holds the ball up for no apparent reason. He takes for ever to take a throw in....some may say he's waiting for some movement...well actually the movement was happening the moment the throw was ready to be taken but then dies out once Haynes had dithered and missed the opportunity. I cannot find one single reason as to why Robins sticks with him. Last night he had a shocking first half, yet merrily came out again after the break.
I know we don't have a lot to fall back on as far as goalies are concerned, but another blind spot is Burge. You just know the moment there is any kind of chaos or panic in the penalty area, Burge just isn't going to be able to get in there and tidy things up. He occasionally pulls off a great save, but there are many more qualities required to call yourself a goal keeper, and Burge is missing most of them, particularly command of the penalty area. I despair as far as he is concerned. A decent keeper would make a world of difference. Even Allsopp looked a class above Burge last night and we all know what we thought of him when he was with us!
He might be fully aware they are weak links at this stage of the season. But they might still be better options than the alternatives that are available.Can someone please explain to me why Robins insists on playing Haynes?! He seems to have a complete blind spot about him. He constantly plays short passes, is extremely predictable which allows the opposition to intercept the ball almost every time. He can't head the ball, he doesn't know how to run down the wing into space....holds the ball up for no apparent reason. He takes for ever to take a throw in....some may say he's waiting for some movement...well actually the movement was happening the moment the throw was ready to be taken but then dies out once Haynes had dithered and missed the opportunity. I cannot find one single reason as to why Robins sticks with him. Last night he had a shocking first half, yet merrily came out again after the break.
I know we don't have a lot to fall back on as far as goalies are concerned, but another blind spot is Burge. You just know the moment there is any kind of chaos or panic in the penalty area, Burge just isn't going to be able to get in there and tidy things up. He occasionally pulls off a great save, but there are many more qualities required to call yourself a goal keeper, and Burge is missing most of them, particularly command of the penalty area. I despair as far as he is concerned. A decent keeper would make a world of difference. Even Allsopp looked a class above Burge last night and we all know what we thought of him when he was with us!
No change there then!No idea what I'm on about
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?