Hopefully your contact is 'on the money', but it wouldn't surprise me, I should've been 'done and dusted' beforehand.
If it's a better deal than ACL's last, these renegade tactics would've been worth it and I would've been proved right in saying, we were right to reject the last offer.
You will only be right if CCFC see the benefit of any further reduction.
Personally I would just prefer a deal to be done.
I would prefer us not be referred to in national media as a club that maybe closed down or a club who don't know where we will be playing.
Then the bookies may not make our manager favourite to take over at smaller clubs
Our situation has nothing to do we robins being linked with other clubs.
Last season we had old ken on the bench and we a real laughing stock. Strangely the manager wasn't a favourite with any vacant jobs then.
Doncaster fans would not had thought they could poach our manager last season
They didn't get our manager this season... He out-and-out rejected them!
Anyway, Thorn hadn't exactly made himself a 'wanted' man, despite numerous chances, we couldn't get out of the relegation zone.
Doncaster fans would not had thought they could poach our manager last season
Re read what I said.
Doncaster fans would not think it was a realistic
Idea to poach the manager if Coventry, without this rent debacle
They think we are skint
http://m.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2012/dec/12/coventry-city-rent-league-two
If no satisfactory resolution can be found, the club could be put into administration, leading to a points deduction and the possibility that a new venue should be found for the club to fulfil their remaining fixtures.
'We want to avoid administration, absolutely, we do,' added Fisher.
'And we have a commitment to fulfil our fixtures - which we fully intend to honour.
'But if the gates at the Ricoh are locked, there may be no alternative but to find another venue.
'If turns out that we don't end up playing at the Ricoh Arena, so be it.'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...id-rent-row-stadium-owners.html#ixzz2HoN0RdAE
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
No don they wouldn't have wanted him. Circumstances are totally irrelevant. Success creates interest.
Total irrelevance regarding the manager.
If no satisfactory resolution can be found, the club could be put into administration, leading to a points deduction and the possibility that a new venue should be found for the club to fulfil their remaining fixtures.
'We want to avoid administration, absolutely, we do,' added Fisher.
'And we have a commitment to fulfil our fixtures - which we fully intend to honour.
'But if the gates at the Ricoh are locked, there may be no alternative but to find another venue.
'If turns out that we don't end up playing at the Ricoh Arena, so be it.'
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...id-rent-row-stadium-owners.html#ixzz2HoN0RdAE
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
My point is not about the manager.
Doncaster fans would not normally expect a coventry manager to consider leaving Coventry to come to them.
At the moment he was their number one choice (fans)
So they believe it to be a realistic proposition.
This is because what they see about us in thd national press gives the impression if a club that us about to implode and can't pay it's debts.
My point is not about the manager.
Doncaster fans would not normally expect a coventry manager to consider leaving Coventry to come to them.
At the moment he was their number one choice (fans)
So they believe it to be a realistic proposition.
This is because what they see about us in thd national press gives the impression if a club that us about to implode and can't pay it's debts.
They are not exact quotes...
It's all rubbish, we won't go into admin etc. just papers trying to get a decent story to fill their pages in their paper, that's all.
Why wouldn't it be realistic. They are higher in the league and better placed for promotion.
Your friend starts a rumour and you question it at the end of your post?, I'm lost....
Were you worried he would go?
Then the bookies may not make our manager favourite to take over at smaller clubs
Not in the slightest. He has made a good start so will be linked. There is no career advancement so no point. If Blackpool were a better run club that would be a possibility.
Not sure why you're still banging on about this. Doncaster said they did not contact Robins and had no intention to. It was down to a punter with too much money, nothing more.
It's the likes of this that makes us look like a club of whom you can steal any player or manager from
http://m.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2012/dec/12/coventry-city-rent-league-two
He was top of their fans poll. Their fans believed they could realistically steal Coventry City's manager.
So did all the bookies so no it was not one punter.
I didn't as I know the truth.
However in the national media we are a skint club on the verge of eviction.
When this rent is sorted clubs smaller than us will not think they have a chance of getting our man.
Want wise top of our initial list? That was never gonna happen.
Mark Robins seemed pretty confident that a deal would be struck very soon aswell!
Jesus!
IT WAS NEVER GOING TO HAPPEN!
Not sure i can be anymore clearer than that
My point is they think it is
Doncaster fans should not think it a realistic proposition to steal a manager from a club like Coventry who are on a roll.
Yet the majority of them did, why?
Because they think we are skint and on the verge if either getting closed down or kicked out of our ground.
WE KNOW THAT IS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.
However when the national media talk about us that is what they focus on.
So get the rent sorted quick it will be better for us as a club.
He was top of their fans poll. Their fans believed they could realistically steal Coventry City's manager.
So did all the bookies so no it was not one punter.
I didn't as I know the truth.
However in the national media we are a skint club on the verge of eviction.
When this rent is sorted clubs smaller than us will not think they have a chance of getting our man.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?